Updates from March, 2011 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Richard Mansel 10:39 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    Scariest Nights of My Life 

    I recently wrote about our harrowing ordeal with an out of control forest fire that burned 4,035 acres and could have decimated our community. We were saved by the heroic efforts of fire fighters and emergency personnel.

    That experience brought to mind two other nights where natural disasters brought death and destruction to our lives.

    The first was on February 5, 2008 in Jackson, Tennessee. I arrived in Henderson, Tennessee for the Freed-Hardeman lectureship and enjoyed the day immensely. That evening I drove to my hotel in Jackson to check into my room. The weather grew worse as I got closer. I turned off my audiobook and discovered that there was a tornado warning.

    At the hotel, I was unable to check in because the power was out. I was ushered into the laundry room and told to get under a blanket since a category 4 tornado was two miles away. One of my friends, Tony Fitzgerald and his family were there and we all spent the night praying that we would not be killed.

    The tornado hit Union University and damaged 31 buildings, doing $40 million in damage. I finally went to my room in the early morning and slept some before waking up and checking in. The staff at the hotel were extraordinary.

    (More …)

     
  • Ed Boggess 8:12 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: April, , ,   

    Atheist’s holiday? – JAM 

    This is Just-a-minute with Ed Boggess. How about this headline: “Florida court sets atheist holy day”. In Florida, an atheist created a case against Easter and Passover Holy days.  He hired an attorney to bring a discrimination case against Christian and Jew observance of their holy days.  The argument was that it was unfair that atheists had no such recognized days. The case was brought before a judge.  After listening to the passionate presentation by the lawyer, the judge banged his gavel declaring, “Case dismissed!” When the lawyer objected, the judge declared that there was already an atheist holiday: “The calendar says April 1st is April Fool’s Day. Psalm 14:1 states, ‘The fool says in his heart, there is no God.’ Thus, it is the opinion of this court, that your client already has April 1st as a holiday.”

     
  • Glenda Williams 7:52 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    The Flood of 1990 

    The little town of Elba, Alabama can only be gotten to by going downhill. It could be dammed up and make a wonderful fishing pond, complete with the antiquated courthouse for the fish to dwell. It was in that little town that we lived in 1990 when the famous flood came and changed our lives forever.

    We lived three blocks from the county courthouse. The rain was coming down in hard sheets and it woudn’t stop. I felt an uneasiness that I had never felt before that something bad was going to happen. We went to stay with mother on the outskirts of town. As the day ended and the night progressed we noticed streets were filling with water. There was no place for the water to go, so it started rising and our little town began filling up. The levee around the city was protecting the city from the higher water outside it, but the levee broke on the morning of March 17, 1990, and the bowl filled up. Inside the bowl of Elba was our house and two vehicles, and everything we treasured and thought we needed.

    No one lost their life in the flood. The memories are vivid still.

     
    • Richard Mansel 10:01 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Good story, Glenda. I once tried out there in Elba and heard the stories and decided it wasn’t for me. At least the house and church were two stories. Sorry to hear you had to endure that flood.

      • Glenda Williams 7:38 pm on April 12, 2011 Permalink | Reply

        Richard, Bill and Bettye Beck lived in that house when it flooded in 1990. They lost all their pictures as well as other things.

        • Richard Mansel 7:57 pm on April 12, 2011 Permalink

          I knew they did and that was very sad day for them.

        • J. Randal Matheny 2:59 pm on April 14, 2011 Permalink

          I’m doing a test to see if I can comment from within the dashboard. If I can, that probably means the problem with commenting is coming from the theme …

  • Stephen R. Bradd 6:59 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Tornado 2003 

    We were at a gospel meeting in Decatur on May 30, 2003 (about 25 miles from our home). We returned to Clinton about 9 PM. The wind was extreme on the highway, but we didn’t know anything about a tornado until we got 1/2 mile from our home (which was next door to the church building at the time). The southern most intersection in Clinton greeted us with downed stoplights and trees in the road. We were able to carefully manuever our way the rest of the way home. The 10 or so mature pine trees near the church building were all down blocking much of the road and parking lot. A significant portion of the roof to the church building had been damaged. Several buildings (200 yards away) were completely destroyed. Our home (the parsonage) had a window blown out and some roof damage. One neighbor’s trampoline was wadded up like a discarded piece of paper and remained crushed on top of the fence. Another neighbor’s double-wide garage door was sucked out of its proper place and partially lying in the driveway. There were many unusual sights. Amazingly, there were no emergency crews on the scene when we got home. We had missed driving into the tornado by less than 10 minutes and arrived on the scene before they did!

    Insurance took care of everything nicely (State Farm). $70,000 damage to the church building (5 months to finish repairs). $6000 to our home (our house was the least damaged in the entire neighborhood). Some neighbors had to move out for months. The neighbors who were home at the time said it sounded like a freight train was going through the neighborhood. Millions of dollars of damage in the community; no fatalities thankfully.

     
  • Ron Thomas 6:42 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Eliminate both? 

    Just as some try to negate “baptism” because it is not mentioned in a verse, and exult a convoluted notion of “faith” because it is, I wonder how some will apply John 15:3. Perhaps they will eliminate both!

    “Already you are clean because of the word that I have spoken to you” (ESV).

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 6:09 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Acts 7, Stephen's speech,   

    Study Bible notes: Acts 7 

    In the comments section below, share your notes on Acts 7 using the NET Bible version. Be blessed also by others’ notes.

    The Study Bible notes tag brings together all the posts on this collaborative effort, as well as the project description. You can add notes to any of the chapters already posted.

    Stephen’s speech, from a rhetorical point of view, is a masterful example of Jewish history told for his clincher: the resistance of God’s people to his leading.

    • Stephen’s Speech (1-53)
      • High Priest’s Question (1)
      • God Calls Abraham (2-8)
      • Jealous Patriarchs and Joseph (9-16)
      • Moses Spurned by Israelite (17-29)
      • Moses Rejected by Israel (30-43)
      • The Tabernacle and Temple (44-50)
      • Accusation: Always Resisting (51-53)
    • Stephen Killed (54-60)
     
  • Ron Thomas 5:46 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Exodus 14 

    1. With the devastation that resulted in Egypt it would only be a natural response that after their (Egyptians) “regrouping,” their anger would be kindled. And, as is often the case, when anger boils up and over, rational thinking wanes.

    2. When ones adds to this that Pharaoh learned the route of the Israelites it is quite possible that he thought they walked into a trap that lead to their death or captivity all over again (14:3, 9). On Pharaoh’s part rational thinking may not have waned at all; in fact, though angered beyond measure, he took his army and pursued the fleeing Israelites. This is not irrational. What is irrational is that Pharaoh thought he was contending against people, and not against the Lord (14:3, 5). How in the world could he have lost sight in that? It is because he kept his thinking strictly on worldly things! Perhaps we might ask how in the world did the Israelites lose sight of the Lord’s protection when they wandered in the wilderness!

    3. In any event, the Lord leads the Israelites in one direction and the king of Egypt pursues them. The Israelites then interpret their location in a special sort of way when they see the king with his army (14:10-12). Immediately they blame Moses for the pending catastrophe. Moses gives reassurance (14:13-14), but there is a perplexing verse (14:15) that has troubled me in my reading. Why would the Lord rebuff Moses in his appeal to the Almighty? There are at least three ways some have interpreted this: 1) “Do you not trust me to deliver you. You need not cry out or complain” (Roper, p. 228), 2) “Now, when Israel is in distress, is no time for lengthy prayer.” (Chumash, p. 371), 3) “Why do you cry out [as if the plight of Israel is your responsibility] to me” (an alternative interpretation in the Chumash).

    4. Whatever the proper way to understand the Lord’s words to Moses, we do know the Lord also said to Moses he was to go forward (cf. 1 Kings 19:15). As the Israelites go forward the Lord takes the “pillar of cloud” that was before them and places it between the Israelites and the Egyptians, thus giving the Israelites protection. The east wind blows all night and Israel walks on dry ground to the other side. The Lord removes the protection (pillar of cloud) of the Israelites, and then Egypt pursues them. They get to the bottom of the sea (on dry ground), and the Lord brings the water back over top them and now they are on the bottom of the sea, having drowned!

    5. Application: It is a norm for people to get angry; this occurs with even the “saintliest” of people. Yet, we might ask, how are we when angry? I don’t get angry often; I remember the few times that I did, however. I boiled up and over and I was on the verge of losing rationality. Has this ever happened to you? Consequently, I have learned to channel my anger in ways that prevent me from overreacting. It has served me exceedingly well. A second lesson to learn is that as the Lord told Moses (and Elijah) when it seems that the world is crushing in on us, we can divert our attention by moving forward. This is not always easy to do, but it is a good thing to do. Leave behind what we can’t tend to and move forward (cf. Philippians 3:12-14).

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 5:31 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Daily Nudge: Your worst natural disaster 

    nature's fury

    Richard’s experience with fire getting close to his home leads us today to the Thursday Nudge: What’s the worst natural disaster you’ve been in or near? Fire, tornado, earthquake, floods, hurricane, blizzards, earthslides, volcano eruptions?

    Such natural powers are devastating, wrenching experiences. Share your encounter with us.

     
    • John Henson 8:44 am on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Would like to say my bank account since I gave the wife her debit card, but I don’t think that’s what you had in mind. Interestingly enough, I’ve never experienced a “natural disaster,” so I have nothing to contribute.

    • Mike Riley 6:45 pm on March 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Like John, I’ve experienced no natural disasters either. And I’m thankful for it!

  • Glenda Williams 9:01 pm on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    “I Will Talk to my Father” 

    I use “Father” when I address the Lord. A friend who works with Hospice, and whose husband is a denominational preacher, told me on one occasion that she prays, “Good morning, Daddy.” I imagine you won’t be able to forget it either.

     
  • Mike Riley 3:47 pm on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: denote, , fact, , , realm   

    Which Of God’s Names? 

    When I address God in prayer, I usually begin with “Heavenly Father” or “Dear Father in heaven” which denotes the fact that God dwells in the heavenly realm (Deuteronomy 4:39; Joshua 2:11; 1 Kings 8:27,30).

     
  • Weylan Deaver 12:02 pm on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Dick Sztanyo, Warren Christian Apologetics Center   

    "The scientific method is an excellent servant of mankind. But, it makes a very poor master...The only conflict that exists between science and biblical theism is contrived and imagined. At the same time, it must be understood that there is no science of origins at all. Such a study is philosophical and revelational in general, and metaphysical in particular."

    Dick Sztanyo in the inaugural issue of "Sufficient Evidence," published by the Warren Christian Apologetics Center, April 2011, p. 12.

     
  • Barbara Ann Oliver 11:15 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Father 

    When I pray in English, I usually say, “Father”. For me, that shows the respect that I have for him as creator and ruler of my house and the desire for a close relationship. When I pray in Spanish, I usually say, “Señor” because Padre sounds too much like I am talking to a priest instead of to God.

     
  • John Henson 9:34 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Addressing My Prayer 

    The prayer of Acts 4:24 began, “Master of all…” which is quite an acceptable way to address God. While some people address deity as “Lord,” or “God,” I prefer to address him as “Lord God.”

    King David’s song of thanks uses this address. He said, “May the Lord God of Israel be praised, in the future and forevermore. Then all the people said, ‘We agree!’” (1 Chronicles 16:36 NET). I realize that some translations use the definite article with this address, but the KJV, NKJV and NET do not.

    Just to be clear, this is not an attempt to force others to use the same address, since this is my own personal opinion.

    Bro. Wayne Jackson has a very good article about the names of God on his website, http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/305-what-about-the-names-of-god

     
  • Ed Boggess 7:55 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Can you hear me now? – JAM 

    . You’ve seen the Verizon commercial, “Can you hear me now?” In 2001 Verizon Wireless hired 50 people to travel the country and test the company’s cellular network. They each averaged 100,000 miles a year, heading in every direction, and testing the Verizon network. A year later Verizon hired thirty-four-year-old Paul Marcarelli of New York City to be the “personification” of those 50 testers. He became simply known as the “Test Guy” and in the Verizon commercials you would see him, on his cell phone, in a variety of places and situations testing the network. Of course there is always a connection, and because it is a commercial, it is always ‘good’. But let me tell you of another network where there is always a connection, better than 3G or 4G, and never a dropped call. The apostle John says: “this is the confidence we have in Him, that if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us.” This is Just-a-minute with Ed Boggess

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 7:31 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Acts 6,   

    Study Bible notes: Acts 6 

    The plot thickens for the church in Acts 6. Internal problems continue with the widows crisis and the opposition widens beyond harassing the apostles to arresting Stephen.

    Share your notes, in Study Bible format, and read the notes of others in this crucial chapter on the progress of the gospel.

    Let’s use the NET Bible version as the basis for comments. Here’s the text for chapter 6.

    The other chapters and the project description can all be found in the Study Bible notes tag.

    • Men Chosen to Serve Widows (1-7)
    • Stephen Arrested (8-15)
     
    • J. Randal Matheny 7:42 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      6.1-7 Though the text does not call the chosen men deacons, they are widely regarded as such. At minimum, they are doing a deacon’s service. The text does not say how the distribution was being made, but it would appear that someone other than the apostles was already involved.

  • J. Randal Matheny 6:39 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Daily Nudge: God’s name in prayer 

    Which of God’s names or titles do you use most in your prayers? Yesterday, in the NT reading we’re following, I was noticing the titles used in that prayer for courage near the end of Acts 5.

    Think over your public and private prayers. What does this choice of preferred terms say about your view of and need for God?

    I do hope you’ll reply, for this promises to furnish some interesting perspectives.

     
  • Ron Thomas 4:10 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: textual criticism   

    Textual Criticism 

    In my casual reading I came across this. I thought it was interesting and worth notice.

    It is important near the beginning of our discussion on New Testament textual criticism to note that the verbal agreement between various New Testament manuscripts is closer than between many English translations of the New Testament and that the actual number of variants in the New Testament is small (approximately 10 percent), none of which call into question any major doctrine.  [from the book: "The Journey from Texts to Translations: The origin and Development of the Bible," Paul D. Wegner, p. 215]

     
  • Ron Thomas 3:28 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Compare John 5:47 and 6:30. If I have compared correctly, I understand the Lord to say that when one believes that one obeys the Lord from the heart (John 3:36; Romans 6:16-17). Those who do not obey do not believe. This shines a light on those who have expressed belief, but have not obeyed the Lord. Those who live this way call the Lord a liar by the life lived (John 3:33).

    So empty it is when people say they believe in Jesus, but they refuse to hear what He says about the life that is to be lived.

     
  • Ron Thomas 3:05 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Exodus 13 

    1. The consecration of the firstborn; an act that means nothing more than setting the firstborn apart for God (13:1-2, 11-16). The firstborn males of both the animals (livestock) and of an Israelite mother. The reason for this consecration was in memory of what the Lord did to the Egyptians (killing their firstborn) and what he did for the Israelites in bringing them out from under Egyptian bondage. Only the males were to be set apart for the Lord; that brings to a mind a question: was it only the firstborn males of the Egyptians that were struck by the Lord? The Scripture does not indicate, although Davis suggests that the Hebrew word “was limited to firstborn males who alone had been in danger from the previous plague” (p. 161).

    2. More attention is given to the feast of Unleavened Bread (13:3-10). Why the insistence on unleavened bread? There are two reasons: first, and foremost, the Lord declared as much; second, there was a lack of time element associated with the use. Perhaps there was an incorporating of the consecration with the feast rather than the two being separated. This seems to be the natural interpretation. The mark on the hand or the frontlet on the forehead (13:9), Keil & Delitzsch said, “…the commands… are to be to the Israelites for signs upon the hand, and for bands between the eyes, i.e., they are to be kept in view like memorials upon the forehead and the hand” (Keil & Delitzsch).

    3. Pharaoh now regroups and sends his army to retrieve what they had lost. The Lord, however, prepares His Israelites to receive the king in a way the king is not prepared to be received. Rather than going toward the land of the Philistines, the Lord sent them another way, toward the Red Sea. Exactly what portion of the Red Sea was ultimately crossed is unknown, but it has been suggested that in ancient times the Suez Canal could have been that portion of the Red Sea that the Israelites went toward. In any case, the Lord moves them in this direction and prepares for the final showdown (13:17-22).

    4. Application: the idea of consecration is a worthy point of consideration. The New Testament tells us we are to set apart the Lord in our hearts, always being ready to give an answer for the hope that lies within us (1 Peter 3:15). This is the idea of consecration. The Israelites were to set aside their firstborn to the Lord; let us set aside God’s firstborn (Colossians 1:15) as well.

     
  • Ron Thomas 2:39 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    You might find this interesting – I did.

    http://michaelsheiser.com/PaleoBabble/2011/03/first-century-jewish-christian-texts-found-in-jordan/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Paleobabble+%28PaleoBabble%29

     
  • Weylan Deaver 2:23 pm on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Harding Graduate School, , Thomas Warren   

    Thanks to a brother I’ve not met who found it and sent me a copy, I listened today to a forum that took place in November 1973 at the Harding Graduate School of Religion in Memphis between my grandfather (Roy C. Deaver) and Gus Nichols. The question was: “Can the guilty party, put away for fornication, scripturally remarry?” Nichols said “yes” and Deaver said “no.” I was five years old back then, so–thanks to modern technology–it was great to be able to hear him defending truth in his prime (about age 51). Thomas B. Warren was in the audience and, when it came time for the Q&A session, he really held Nichols’ feet to the fire, as well.

     
    • Glenda Williams 5:15 pm on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Very interesting. I’m glad that you were able to obtain this and hear it.

    • Michael Carter 6:38 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Wow! I would love to hear that!

    • Stanley Adams 9:59 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Hello Weylan, is this tape going to be made available? I believe that I was in the audience that day. Would love to hear it.

      Stan Adams, Memphis TN

    • Weylan Deaver 11:57 am on March 30, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      As far as I know, the fellow who sent it to me simply contacted Harding Grad School and they sent him a copy. I assume they would do the same for others who requested it. Makes you wonder what else they have in the archives…

  • TFRStaff 11:37 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Hugh Fulford: Stop! 

    Excuses for not stopping

    The sign said “STOP.” I didn’t. So I said to the judge …

    1. I think every person has the right to choose his own interpretation of this word.

    2. My mother did not believe in stopping. If I were to stop, I would be condemning her.

    3. My family never stopped. If that was good enough for them, it is good enough for me.

    4. I have gone so long without stopping, I don’t think I can start now.

    5. My preacher says I don’t have to stop.

    6. My parents made me stop when I was young, so I don’t do it now. (More …)

     
    • Stanley Adams 2:08 pm on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I think that this says a lot about a lot of things going on. I learned my Covenants and Testaments and when the kingdom of Christ began over 45 years ago. In fact, using the old Tisdale Charts for personal work proves the point. There are a lot of divisions for us to learn, and there are a lot of things to learn about the gospel of Christ and His kingdom that were slowly being dispensed during his earthly ministry that did not make it happen. The Kingdom of Christ and of His God occurred in Acts 2 and it will continue until the Kingdom of the Church is swallowed up into the Kingdom of Heaven.

  • Richard Mansel 9:15 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Robbing the Bible Again 

    Peter once said to Jewish leaders about preaching the Gospel, “We ought to obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). God told Jeremiah, when he called him to be a prophet, “Do not be afraid of their faces, for I am with you to deliver you” (Jeremiah 1:8).

    We trust God and fear Him above anything man has to say or offer to the discussion. Culture must never be allowed to override what God says. Yet, that never stops the vanity of humanity when it comes to the Word of God.

    Once again, mankind is more frightened of being criticized by humans than they are of the Divine God and His wrath to come. Dictionary.com is discussing how translations of God’s Word are changed and whether that will have an impact on the meaning of Scripture. Of course, many publishers don’t care as long as money rolls in.

    What are your thoughts about the article entitled, What Words Will be Changed in Two New Editions to the Bible?

     
    • J. Randal Matheny 11:54 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Seems replacing “booty” for “spoils of war” was a good option. Languages change over time, so translations need to communicate accurately in terms that people understand, not a foreign tongue from years past that no one speaks any more.

      Many of the comments show much ignorance. I wanted to ask this lady how she knew what she affirmed: “The KJV is the ONLY version that I believe is the closest to the way God wanted us to read his word. Changing ‘words’ is man’s attempt to change what shouldn’t be changed. God knew a long time ago what today’s language would be like and He chose to have it HIS way.”

      Maybe she had a direct revelation. And I bet it was in KJV language.

  • Stephen R. Bradd 8:10 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Upcoming travel 

    I wrote about this once before, and the date is quickly approaching. April 1st is the day I selected to fulfill my word (“Marathon for Fools,” I’m calling it, though I don’t think anyone else will be running except me, but there will be brethren present having a good time at my expense!). I will be traveling 26.2 miles on foot around a country “block” (it will mean about 7 laps for me to cover by either running, jogging, walking, crawling, or any combination thereof).

    How did this all transpire? A Christian couple here were training for a marathon and the wife was telling a group of us that she didn’t know if she would finish under the 7 hour time limit. I told her that would be slightly less than 4 miles an hour and that a quick walk for 7 hours would get it done–even without running. She observed that it was easy for me to say so, since I wasn’t running. I told her I was confident I could cover the same distance in under 7 hours without training. She scoffed. Thus, I gave her my word that I would do so this year if she was successful (extra motivation for her, indeed!). She finished at 6 hr 18 min, so now I will try my best to keep my word, all the while reflecting upon Psalm 15:4. My only “training” has been reading a few articles on long-distance running. I’ve never ran more than 3 miles at one time.

    When I get up enough strength to get back on the computer afterward (assuming I survive), I’ll let you know how it went. I’m hopeful I can beat her 6 hr 18 min finish. The pace won’t be a problem, just the endurance aspect. Will my body and will power hold up that long? I think I’m strong enough, but only time will tell!

     
    • Barbara Ann Oliver 9:28 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      The only advice I can give is don’t wear new shoes or socks. Wear stuff that you are already comfortable with. I know you can do it!!

  • Ed Boggess 7:29 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Zodiac   

    Capricorn? – JAM 

    This is Just-a-minute with Ed Boggess. Guess what? I am a totally different person than I was last year. And I’m not happy about it. Jan 13th a Minneapolis astronomer named Prof Kunkle announced that the Zodiac was being adjusted and a new sign added.  Evidently the moon’s gravitational pull on Earth over the centuries caused the Earth to wobble a bit and the stars are somehow realigned. It has turned my world topsy-turvy! I used to be a happy Aquarius, but now I discover that I’m not an Aquarius at all. I’m a Capricorn. It’s like your mother telling you that you were adopted! As soon as I heard it, I knew I was in trouble. So I looked it up. An Aquarius is honest, loyal and independent. But a Capricorn is controlling, conceited and distrusting. So what’s the solution? I think I will go with what Jeremiah said long ago: “do not be dismayed at the signs of heaven.

     
  • Richard Mansel 5:53 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    When Our Community Burned 

    “On March 24, 2011, a controlled burn in Ludowici, Georgia spreads on the wings of high winds. Exceedingly dry conditions and the fuel of Georgia Pines accelerate the conflagration. Fire trucks and emergency services swiftly move into action. Smoke billows into the sky sounding the alarm for miles around.”

    Read More

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 5:11 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Study Bible notes: Acts 5 

    Acts Study BibleRead and contribute study notes to Acts 5, based on the NET Bible here. Previous contributions to notes and the original project description are under the Study Bible notes tag.

    The more people contribute, the fuller and more useful will be the final document to be shared at the end of the project. At left (click to enlarge) is a view of the format the Acts Study Bible will have.

    Here are my headings for the major sections of Acts 5:

    • Ananias and Sapphira (1-11)
    • Unity, Growth and Healings (12-15)
    • Angel Frees Imprisoned Apostles (16-32)
    • Gamaliel’s Counsel (33-42)
     
    • J. Randal Matheny 1:28 pm on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      5:4 “lied … to God.” To lie to the Holy Spirit is to lie to God, because he is divine. He is placed equally with the Father and the Son, Mt 28:19, 2Co 13:14.

    • J. Randal Matheny 3:10 pm on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      5:1-11 The discipline of Ananias and Sapphira makes clear that God takes seriously one’s words (they lied), one’s motivations (they wanted recognition without the sacrifice), and purity in the church (they acted with hypocrisy). Peter acted by the Spirit’s guidance, evidenced by the death of the two, so the interruption in the heretofore unimpeded progress of the church is a divine, not human, determination.

    • Rick Kelley 3:26 pm on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Acts 5:13-14 – (re: Ananias and Sapphira and consequent fallout). Discipline alienates some, demands respect from most, and encourages those who seek the truth.

      • Rick Kelley 3:28 pm on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply

        Should have clarified as such: “alienates…(13a), demands respect (13b)…and encourages (14).

  • Ron Thomas 4:54 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Exodus 12 

    1. The Israelites are now prepared for their departure; their departure is not one to be leisurely engaged in, but with haste they are to leave Egypt. With this departure, the last plagued having been administered, the Lord will have executed judgment on all the gods of Egypt (12:12, pun intended).

    2. The Passover. The institution of the feast consisted of the following requirements (all from C-12). One male lamb, a year old, without blemish per household. This lamb will be killed at twilight on the fourteenth day of the first month (Abib). The blood of this lamb will be used to mark each Israelite home (12:7). The meal for the occasion will be one that consists of lamb’s flesh, unleavened bread, and bitter herbs (12:8). Nothing boiled or raw will be consumed. What is not consumed will be burnt. The apparel that is to be worn when eating is clothing that is prepared for a journey (12:11). This feast will be kept annually, and in conjunction with the Passover feast there is the feast of Unleavened Bread,” a continued reminder of not only the deliverance, but of the journey ahead of them. These seven days are “bookended” with a holy assembly (12:1-28). No foreigner (uncircumcised male) shall eat of the Passover. It will be eaten inside the home of the one who sacrificed the lamb, nothing will be removed from the home, and neither will the lamb’s bones be broken. One law to the whole nation applies (12:43-51).

    3. With the Passover ordinance in front of the Israelites they are now going to experience the significance of the occasion. What the king of Egypt tried to do (resist) he could no longer do.

    4. Application: In a boastful tone the king said he did not know the Lord and neither would he let the Israelites go free from their slavery. Now, in a defiant tone the Egyptians are plundered by the ones they held in strict bondage (12:36). It has been said that he who boasts the loudest will be the one who is humbled the quickest. The humble circumstances the Israelites endured – they carried their possessions with them (12:34) – leaves an impression on me. We are a people richly blessed and how it is that I hear many complain about this or that. Yet, reflect as well as you can on what it was the Israelites had when they left. There was family and what little belongings they had.

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 4:40 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , trips   

    Daily Nudge: Where’s Wally? 

    trips ahoyWell, Wally is lost somewhere, but where are you? Barbara Ann and Chad, we know, are gallivanting in lands afar, Larry, too, is on the road in swampy ground. And the family and I made a quick jaunt Sunday.

    So tell us where you are, what you’re up to, who you’re with. Or where you’ve been recently, if you’re shortly returned from a trip.

    Jesus made trips, Paul did, too. Christians were often on the move, and always on foot for the gospel.

    Maybe yours was for that reason, maybe for other motives, but a change of scenery often provides renewal for the heart and mind.

    Where are you?

     
  • Weylan Deaver 2:52 pm on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    This afternoon I’m to begin reading Augustine’s (born 354 A.D.) “Confessions” for the first time. I understand Calvinism owes much to Augustine’s thought. I like reading primary source documents. If this one is worthwhile, I may tackle his “The City of God” (which is much longer).

     
    • Ron 5:04 am on March 29, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I just listened to two lectures on Augustine. Those lectures were on “Authority” and “The origin of evil.” The one on authority, I thought, was excellent. Lecturer was by Thomas Williams.

  • Mike Riley 2:30 pm on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , animal, beat, boast, , , dance, hare, , nap, , speed, swift   

    Favorite Fable 

    The Hare and the Tortoise is one of my favorite fables:

    The hare was once boasting of his speed before the other animals. “I have never yet been beaten,” said he, “when I put forth my full speed. I challenge anyone here to race with me.”

    The tortoise said quietly, “I accept your challenge.”

    “That is a good joke,” said the hare. “I could dance around you all the way.”

    “Keep your boasting until you’ve beaten,” answered the tortoise. “Shall we race?”

    So a course was fixed and a start was made. The hare darted almost out of sight at once, but soon stopped and, to show his contempt for the tortoise, lay down to have a nap. The tortoise plodded on and plodded on, and when the hare awoke from his nap, he saw the tortoise nearing the finish line, and he could not catch up in time to save the race.

    The moral of the story: Victory does not always belong to the swiftest runner, but to the runner with the most stamina and self-control: http://mbriley.preachersfiles.com/2010/01/07/running-the-race-of-life-every-day/

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 11:42 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Study Bible notes: Acts 4 

    Here’s the reading for today in the NET Bible version. Add your concise notes on a word, phrase, or even a segment of the chapter, and we’ll choose some of them for inclusion in the final document on Acts.

    These are my subtitles for the main sections in Acts 4:

    • The Boldness of Peter and John (1-22)
    • Disciples Pray for Boldness (23-31)
    • Unity and Generosity (32-37)
     
    • J. Randal Matheny 4:08 pm on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      29 “with great courage” They didn’t ask for persecution to cease, but for them to continue to speak with courage. The Lord honored their request, since this was his will, that the gospel be preached regardless of reactions.

      • Rick Kelley 8:47 pm on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply

        18 “And they called them in and ordered them not to speak or teach at all in the name of Jesus.” No technical note, but a simple observation: apparently, this plan failed.

  • TFRStaff 9:58 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    paraiba_mission – Thank You, Patrick 

    pet cockatiel

    by Joseph McKinney Jr.

    February 28, 2011 was a tragic day for the McKinney family: Patrick, our friend and companion of four years, died. He was our pet cockatiel. A cockatiel can live up to twenty-five years, but Patrick’s life was cut short when he got stepped on.

    On the day, intense grief cut short my breath, like a stone weighed on my sternum, blocking the air. The kids were devastated, and I couldn`t talk to anybody without my eyes tearing up.

    I was embarrassed – I had to cancel the visits and Bible study I had lined up that day. I had comforted that very week three people, one who lost a father, and two who lost mothers, and here I was all torn up over a stupid bird. I was ashamed.

    But then again, he wasn`t just a stupid bird. Patrick woke up every morning whistling the Brazilian national anthem.

    In his own way, he ruled the house, using his cage only for meals or to sleep. He was a bird free to come and go as he pleased – you`d think he would want to escape, not Patrick – he loved us too much, especially the kids; he had to be around them all the time. When he heard them wake in the morning, he would sound off loud ear-piercing whistles (his way of screaming for attention) until one of them came to give him a good morning. When the kids were at school he would be as quiet as a mouse, but when he recognized the sound of the car bringing them home – he would start screaming again until he got the attention he wanted.

    We thought Patrick was indestructible – we lost count of how many time he got stepped on, sat on, or run over, but the dangers didn`t scare him: he was the happiest when he was among the feet of a group of playing children. Almost daily he would engage in a strange ritual: singing to Lucas’ feet.

    His favorite place in the world – sitting on someone`s shoulder. For him it was like being king of the mountain, a position he fought for, pecking hard anyone who tried to displace him.
    When Edda scolded him for chewing up ferns, he knew he was in trouble, looking just like kid, hanging his head and trying to hide behind something.

    He was part of our family, filling our house with song, but now it is silent. A sense of the purposeless fragility of life slapped me in the face; Lydia buried herself inside her self; Samuel cried constantly for two or three days and is writing Patrick`s name all over his notebooks; Lucas kept saying over and over, “I want to have Patrick back.”

    Is it presumptuous to look for purpose in the life and death of a bird? Is Patrick teaching my kids a valuable life lesson on how to deal with loss and longing? Or could God have had a even deeper mission for our little bird? Twelve days after Patrick, Samuel said, “Dad, I want to be baptized.” I was driving and a flood of emotion rushed over me. I avoided a wreck and, after a moment, managed a calm question, “Samuel, why do you want to be baptized?”

    “Well, I`ve thought about it for a long time, but didn`t feel I was ready. But when Patrick died, it made me think that I need to get ready.”

    I told him that we would study to prepare for this decision, the most important of his life. A huge smile, one I hadn`t seen for days, lit up his face. On Sunday, in front of the whole congregation, we announced that Samuel was studying to be baptized and asked the brothers and sisters to pray and encourage him. And they have given him just that. A group of young people came over to the house to visit him and share experiences of the Christian life.

    Then Daniel (14 yr old), who has just started coming to the Sunday meeting, saw the youth group planning to visit Samuel. Though being very shy, he gathered the courage to ask for a visit too, showing interest in studying also.

    My son at age 11 is beginning his journey on the way of eternity, another is being influenced to consider life matters, where will it spread to and for how long? Only our Father, who can use even a little bird to bring about His plans, knows. “Two sparrows cost only a penny, but not even one of them can die without your Father’s knowing it.” Matthew 10:29

    Thank you, Patrick, for filling our house with song during your short life. Thank you, Lord, for using Patrick to fill our Heavenly Home with people You and we love.

    Please remember Samuel and his decision in your prayers.

     
    • Mike Riley 10:56 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      This story brought tears to my old eyes. A beautiful illustration of how God can use a seemingly insignificant bird to bring out His will.

      May the Lord richly bless young Samuel in His decision to be obedient to His will.

  • John Henson 9:17 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: bee, sting,   

    Evil Deeds 

    The queen of a hive of bees ascended one day to Olympus to present Jupiter with fresh honey from her combs. Jupiter, delighted with the offering, promised to grant whatever the queen bee wished. She asked him for a sting, so that if any mortal threatened her honey, she may kill him. The request displeased Jupiter because he loved men so much, but he had no choice. He granted the request, but told the queen bee that if she used the sting, it would take her own life. Evil wishes come home to roost.

    Evil deeds “come home to roost,” too. We cannot expect our actions to disappear into a dark void never to return. As much as humans wish to avoid responsibility for their actions, the Bible returns us to the good sense of the Apostle Paul’s words, “Be not deceived; God is not mocked; for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap,” (Galatians 6:7).

     
  • Ed Boggess 8:10 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Cheerful giving 

    “God loves a cheerful giver” – 2 Cor 9:7. Here is something I didn’t know before: the word translated cheerful is the same word when transliterated into English as “hilarious”, and translated “happy” or “cheerful”. This is the only time this word us used in the Bible, although a related word from the same root is used in Romans 12:8.

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 8:08 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Daily Nudge: fave fable 

    Remember Aesop, the master teller of fables? He doesn’t have a corner on the market, but he’s the best known of the spinners of such tales. Do you have a favorite fable to share? Can be one from the old master or a new concoction. Why is this particular fable special to you?

    I heard one yesterday about the nice little farm with one cow. But that’s for another time. It reminded me to ask in the Nudge today.

     
  • Ed Boggess 7:57 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    A shocking development! – JAM 

    This is Just-a-minute with Ed Boggess. Dwight Wymer, a Baptist preacher from Grand Rapids, Michigan, made the news during VBS. He used a home-made electric chair to shock his young Bible students. Holding his Bible to read, he would tell the class that God wants to speak to them and when they didn’t pay attention, he would zap them with an electrical shock. Then he would explain that God sometimes can shock us into hearing His word. Wymer reported that from then on they paid attention when he read the Bible to them. Complaints from parents forced him to give up the practice. While I don’t recommend Wymer’s methodology, a few well placed electrical connections here and there in the auditorium might do more to restore some liveliness into our services and awake the sleepy saints than a hundred other suggestions. It might have even stirred Laodicea from its lukewarmness.

     
  • Stephen R. Bradd 7:50 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Timber! 


    I did something new on Saturday. I used a chain saw and a 50′ manlift for the first time. What a combination, eh? LOL. A tree in our front yard died last year and has been dropping large branches in our yard & on top of our van periodically. It was going to cost $800 to hire it done, so I rented the equipment & paid my brother to help for half the price.

    So, I saved $400 and had a good deal of fun as well. No significant problems. Muscles are a little sore now two days later but not bad. I suffered a small bump on the head when a branch misbehaved. No property damage to my house or the neighbors (which was the main concern). My boys took a ride on the lift after we were done. It killed them to have to stay inside all day and watch, but they complied.

    Here a few more pics:



     
  • Ron Thomas 4:51 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Exodus 11 

    1. This chapter poses a chronology problem for us. If Moses was not allowed to see the king again (10:28), how, then, in 11:8 is it that Moses went out in “hot anger”? It is probably best to read the words of 11:4-8 in conjunction with 10:28. In other words, the king said he wanted to see Moses and Aaron no more, so Moses said what we read in 11:4-8, 10:29.

    2. When Moses walked out the Lord made it clear again that the king would not listen. One other point on this: because the movie “The Ten Commandments” is as popular as it is (even six decades since its production), it is good to be sure that we have a proper biblical understanding. Moses knew the Lord’s ultimate judgment would be the death of Pharaoh’s son (4:23); it was not something that he learned about later (as the Moses describes).

    3. Moses interaction with (and against) Pharaoh as this point is important. Already Moses had gained a reputation before the Egyptians, and whatever positive reputation the king had it was gone. Now, a final battle is in place. Not much of a battle was it! This battle, of course, was not against Moses, but against the Great King (God). It could not be said that Pharaoh did not know God (cp. 5:2) for by this time he knew Him well. Whatever “divinity” the king though he had left, it was about to be shown to him that he believed in demonic forces.

    4. Moses, with much anger (because he knew this did not have to happen), leaves the presence of the king and prepares the Israelites. With three days of darkness, how could the Egyptians operate? That’s the point, they did not. The Israelites, on the other hand, had light and they were preparing to make their way to the promised land (11:1-3). Perhaps it was on the evening of the third night that the Lord brought His last plague. Already the Egyptians are dispirited beyond measure; now they are unable to move about because of the darkness, and the soon next plague.

    5. Application: The Israelites had to endure much aggravation at the hand of the Egyptians, and now they are on the cusp of leaving the bondage to a home they only heard about. Unbeknownst to them, they were about to go through their greatest trial. That is the way it is, some times. We see the bright day very close at hand and we are unaware that after this bright day comes a purging.

     
  • Ron Thomas 4:43 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    The Lord’s Crown of Life 

    Temptation is an inward desire to alter one’s course of thinking. That suggested altered course of thinking could be a matter of sin, or not! The inward desire that encourages us to alter our way of thinking away from the revealed will of the Lord and away from the principles of righteousness is sin. The Lord said we are blessed (not necessarily happy) when we have endured the temptation that has been presented to us because the end result of such continued endurance is the Lord’s crown of life. When we are tested can we say that it is the same as being tempted? The answer is no. No matter the source of a temptation, that temptation produces an internal desire to alter the course of righteousness, it is a solicitation to evil. A test does not do this, though it can affect the internal desire, but it is designed to firm up our spiritual shield (James 1:2-4). James says that God tries men for the purpose of determining the genuineness of their faith; he denies that God tests man for the purpose of seducing them to sin (Woods, p. 59). Have you passed your test? RT

     
    • ubcky4 9:29 am on March 28, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      This is a powerful short and precise message that all should hear and learn. The Lord does not tempt us. He only tests us for the purpose of determining our genuineness of faith. For without a test, their will be no testimony following your confession and profession of Faith in Christ.

      Need to prove your genuineness , accept a test from God. But get prepared to resist temptations from any angle they may be coming from to you.

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,082 other followers

%d bloggers like this: