Intimidation, Study Bibles, parables, radio, knowing God &c.
The prayer site has had almost no success. Partly, perhaps, because much of the content is in verse. Perhaps others prefer private prayer. I try to keep from drifting toward unflattering explanations.
• I missed the first presidential debate, but I did watch most of the Veep one-sided melee last night. I missed just the first part. Biden’s performance seemed to be of a piece with the present administration, characterized by intimidation. Perhaps people will see it for what it is, though polls (the modern equivalent to reading animal entrails) don’t appear encouraging. If not, America becomes a frightening place. At the very least, the deck is stacked against those who want to have a real conversation.
• I mention the debate here, because arrogant intimidation is one of the principal tactics of progressives in the church as well. I’ve seen it up close. And when they don’t get their way, they up and leave. Until they find an opportunity more to their liking. But these days, they seem to have many an opportunity.
• A sister in Christ asked on Facebook about study Bible recommendations. Might you have one, or several? I have a few study Bibles, but not many of them would I recommend. The NIV/NASB Study Bible (book introductions at link!) is good in history, wishy-washy at times on doctrine, trying to please the whole gamut of evangelicals. Overall, a good choice, to my mind. The NET Bible has good notes, mostly textual and translation. One of my favorites.
I’ve heard good things about the ESV Study Bible, but can’t emit an opinion. The Harper Study Bible is more conservative than its NRSV version, but skimpy, even after the expanded edition. An interesting feature of this one are the book outlines embedded within the text. The Lutheran Study Bible (not to be confused with Lutheran Study Bible, of liberal bent) is conservative, and often has good content, but too much love for Luther. I have the Jerusalem Bible in Portuguese, and it may very much be considered a study Bible, often with insightful notes, but pulls toward Catholicism at times, obviously. It has been revised, now it’s the New Jerusalem Bible.
Delving into the NLT Study Bible, online, it seems to have rather simple explanatory notes. The FaithLife Study Bible looks impressive so far, after a few weeks of online consultation, but it doesn’t look like it will go to print. You’ll have it as an app. What else is out there, and what have you to observe about any of them?
• That reminds me: Guy N. Woods revised Johnson’s People’s New Testament, but apparently Gospel Advocate decided to shelve its publication. Would make a nice online offering, would it not?
• Something came to mind Wednesday night as we read the major part of Matthew 13, the discourse of Christ about the parables of the kingdom. Many of the parables look toward some judgment, end, or result, several to the final judgment. Point being that Jesus throws our attention to the end when the separation will come between good and evil, sheep and goats, good ground and bad. But the parables themselves serve as judging function in the present, from the way people respond to them. Not sure what to make of it, but it’s a fascinating thought.
• John Henson has what I think is his first audio file now online from his new radio program in Grand Blanc, “Can We Understand the Bible Alike?” He has a warm conversational tone with some clear examples. I think he’s made a fine start of it. It’s about 12 minutes long, so check it out.
• The glory of man is the knowledge of God. All his plan and works, including his word of revelation, serve that end. “May grace and peace be lavished on you as you grow in the rich knowledge of God and of Jesus our Lord!” (2Pe 1.2). Not the height of hubris, but the amazed voice of the redeemed says, “our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ” (1Jo 1.3). To be close to the Creator is a wondrous thought, and not to be taken lightly, as John will go on to say; not to be proclaimed in word only but to be lived in his brilliant holiness.

John Bost 7:04 am on October 13, 2012 Permalink |
I use PC Study Bible From Bible Soft. I have used it for years and it has been a tremendous asset to my Bible study, sermon preparation and Web page writing. http://www.biblesoft.com
J. Randal Matheny 7:06 am on October 13, 2012 Permalink |
John, thanks for chiming in on that one, especially since it’s an OS-specific app. What features does it have that endear you to it?
Gary Greene 8:11 am on October 13, 2012 Permalink |
The ESV Study Bible is strongly anti-baptism. The point of the FaithLife Study Bible is to always present the most current scholarship and discoveries and always be growing. That is why they intend to never print it.
J. Randal Matheny 8:18 am on October 13, 2012 Permalink |
Gary, I imagine that all the Protestant-produced study Bibles are going to be that way, doncha think? They’re going to show their tendencies, so we’ll have to put up with that until some good brethren produce one. NET Bible has gotten around the problem of print vs. keeping up with scholarship by freezing the text for a period of a few years and then coming out with editions. So they’re in the first edition right now.
John Henson 9:10 am on October 13, 2012 Permalink |
Gary’s right. It’s strong suit, in my view, is in the O.T. It’s pretty valuable there.
JB Murphy 12:08 pm on October 13, 2012 Permalink |
Randal,
The Dickson New Analytical Study Bible (KJV) has been popular with churches of Christ in the various congregations I have been part of, especially in the southeastern US. I was surprised that it did not receive some mention. Was it because of the translation?
J. Randal Matheny 12:20 pm on October 13, 2012 Permalink |
Hi, JB, actually I didn’t think about it. And it doesn’t seem to offer quite what most study Bibles do, with comments and notes. As I recall—correct me if I’m wrong—it’s more a system of references. The KJV is a minus for me, but I don’t know that I would have excluded it just for that.
JB Murphy 12:53 pm on October 13, 2012 Permalink |
Randal,
Regarding a “system of references”, I think you’re thinking about Thompson Chain Reference Study Bible.
The beneficial part of the Dickson is its simplicity. It has a decent overview of the Bible, its divisions, canon, and history of English translation (dated) and a reasonably concise Bible dictionary.
Each book has a one-page formatted chart for dividing the content as well as a short one-page textual introduction. At the end of each book is an outline and some facts about each book, along with a chart for NT references (if OT), and contemporary history (prob dated).
Appended to the Bible are Chronologies (OT and NT), an outline form of the Mosaic Law, outline indexes for important characters (Moses, David, etc.), prayers of Bible, miracles list, some topical studies, etc, closing with a Concordance and Index.
Its not as large as the ESV Study Bible, but contains enough information to provide overviews, charts and a decent timeline of events. Because it doesn’t have study notes for each passage, it allows for the use of the overview and important characters mentioned to shape the interpretation.
With that being said, I haven’t used the Dickson in several years, but would like to see it updated per archaeology (like the NIV Archaeology study bible) and other historical info but keep the format and in a more modern translation.
J. Randal Matheny 1:12 pm on October 13, 2012 Permalink |
You’re right, I was thinking about Thompson. I assume Dickson hasn’t been updated, then? Are there any notes or comments on individual verses? That seems to me to be one of the features of a study Bible. But that’s just me …