Updates from Richard Mansel RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Richard Mansel 5:11 pm on May 23, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Abortion Attitudes are Changing 

    The Gallup Organization is reporting that the attitudes of Americans on abortion are changing dramatically.

    The 41% of Americans who now identify themselves as “pro-choice” is down from 47% last July and is one percentage point below the previous record low in Gallup trends, recorded in May 2009. Fifty percent now call themselves “pro-life,” one point shy of the record high, also from May 2009.

    Among independent voters, they report that pro-lifers outnumber those who espouse the pro-choice position.

    Technologies such as advanced ultrasound machines are a significant factor in changing attitudes. It is more difficult to see the fetus as a “viable tissue mass” when it is on the screen so clearly alive. We pray that Americans will continue to move towards life on this most important issue.

     

     
  • Richard Mansel 10:51 am on May 22, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Christ is in you 

    Scripture is filled with passages teaching that the Lord dwells with His followers. This bond is sacred.

    Salvation is described in the New Testament is existing in Christ and only there can we find spiritual blessings (Ephesians 1:3). We are baptized into Christ (Galatians 3:27) and added to the Church, his body (Acts 2:47; Ephesians 1:22-23).

    Burton Coffman sums it up succinctly in his commentary on Galatians.

    God is in Christians.
    Christians are in God.
    Christ is in Christians.
    Christians are in Christ.
    The Holy Spirit is in Christians.
    Christians are in the Holy Spirit.
    The mind of Christ is in Christians.
    The word of Christ is in Christians.

    From this, we can clearly see why transformation is so important (Romans 12:1-2). We have a very high calling as God’s people and that brings a lot of responsibility (Ephesians 4:1). Yet, it will all be worth it in the end! Praise be the Lord!

     
  • Richard Mansel 1:12 pm on May 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    A Book Wish 

    As a huge reader, I have one wish that probably won’t come true. However, what’s the harm in sharing that with you, my friends. If I could get brotherhood books free at the library I would probably read almost all of them. :)

     

     

     
  • Richard Mansel 8:19 pm on May 7, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Ignorance of the English language leaves scars that profanity is quick to fill. Cursing is the carrion of the language. So rise above such weaknesses and have pure speech that edifies and all those around you will be happier.

    “Even so the tongue is a little member and boasts great things. See how great a forest a little fire kindles! And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity. The tongue is so set among our members that it defiles the whole body, and sets on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire by hell. For every kind of beast and bird, of reptile and creature of the sea, is tamed and has been tamed by mankind. But no man can tame the tongue. It is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. With it we bless our God and Father, and with it we curse men, who have been made in the similitude of God. Out of the same mouth proceed blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not to be so” (James 3:5-10).

     
    • Eugene Adkins 6:31 am on May 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Several weeks ago in the teenage class we talked about how the “origin” of the word profanity could be seen in the root word profane and how it really describes the true meaning of profanity.

      When someone has been used to talking like a salior they can easily fall back into a bad habit when the “seas” start to get a little rough.

      Good thoughts, Richard.

  • Richard Mansel 10:42 am on May 5, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Daily Nudge: Books of the Bible 

    I thought I would ask a question to get some discussion started on the Fellowship Room. I don’t know if this has been asked before or not. I’m not sure where I heard it. Nevertheless, here is the question.

    If you were on a deserted island and could only have two individual books of the Bible, which ones would you want and why?

    Speak up and share your thoughts on this interesting questions. Maybe they are your favorite books of the Bible or maybe they would serve special purposes for your situation.

    What say you?

     
    • Eugene Adkins 4:56 pm on May 5, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      This question is almost unfair :) Only one is a part of my “regular favorites” but considering the “island scenario” I would pick one from the OT and one from the NT.

      #1 – The Psalms: Think about the lenghty reading material in one book!

      #2 – The Gospel according to John: Becuase John just won’t let you forget about who Jesus really is!

      Good question, Richard.

    • Ron Thomas 4:59 am on May 6, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I am not quite sure what two books i would have if only two were available to me to choose from; I suspect one would be the Gospel of John, perhaps the other would be Ecclesiastes.

    • Barbara Ann Oliver 9:44 pm on May 6, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I would choose Ecclesiastes to keep me focused mentally so I wouldn’t go bonkers, and the gospel according to Luke to keep me focused on Jesus.

  • Richard Mansel 3:25 pm on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , mdr,   

    Battleground Passage 

    I have been asked to speak on 1 Corinthians 7:14-16:

    14: “For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy.

    15: But if the unbeliever departs, let him depart; a brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases. But God has called us to peace.

    16: For how do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, O husband, whether you will save your wife?

    Considering the number of doctrinal fights over this passage concerning marriage, divorce and remarriage, this is a daunting task. I guess I will find out how many theories there are out there for this passage.

    The first and last verses are rather easy — the middle is a battlefield passage in the Lord’s church.  Entire books have been written on this passage doing battle against false doctrines.

    What are your thoughts on this passage? Thanks for your input!

     

     
    • Weylan Deaver 3:31 pm on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I recommend Thomas B. Warren’s book, “Under Bondage To the Law of Christ (The Only Real Freedom),” in which he refutes the error of James D. Bales’ book, “Not Under Bondage.” Error on MDR will continue to be a thorn in the church’s side as long as we cave to society rather than listen to what the Lord said in Matthew 19.

    • Richard Mansel 3:41 pm on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Thank you, brother. I have that book right in front of me.

    • Ron Thomas 4:40 am on May 3, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I think as Weylan does, but all applications belong to the couples that might be involved in a compromise. What I mean by this is simply this: I am not an investigator; if one mentions to me something on the topic, I will show them the Lord’s teachings, and encourage them to make application where required.

      It’s a tough subject, but more so because of the compromises that have resulted with the break down of morality.

    • Russ McCullough 7:53 am on May 3, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      First and foremost, Paul is 100% consistent with Christ in Matt. 19. That is a given. Jesus says that marriage is only between one man and one woman for life, death and adultery excepted. Those separating for other reasons must relegate themselves to “eunuch for the Kingdom” status for the rest of their lives – no sexual unions with anyone else…ever. A very high standard. Paul is allowing the Christian freedom to let their pagan mate to leave. The Christian is not “bound” to go with them. However, if there is no adultery on the part of the pagan mate, there is also…according to Christ…no permission to remarry. In pagan society, however, adultery at the pagan temples would be the norm, not the exception. When that would happen the Christian could then scripturally remarry. Not many can hear this truth. Bro. Keeble once observed; “Baptism washes away sins, not marriages.”

      • Royce Pendergrass 6:27 am on May 4, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        I am not a book salesman but I would recommend Bro. Burton Coffman’s Commentary on 1 Corinthians on this subject particularly his footnote on the chapter. I had a good brother tell me he felt compelled to take a candidate to the back room to determine if they were fit for baptism. My simple thought was, “where is the doctrine that teaches that?”

  • Richard Mansel 1:08 pm on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , commentaries. bible study   

    Online Commentaries for Books of the Bible 

    Someone has provided a very helpful list of online commentaries on every book of the Bible. Read, study and enjoy.

    However, all Bible students must be wise and divide truth from error when they read Biblical materials written by human beings. Some of these commentaries are by brethren but most are not. However, of the latter group, some great scholars make the list. So, use wisdom and have a pen ready to take notes.

     

     
    • Weylan Deaver 3:25 pm on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I didn’t realize all that was available for the taking. Still, there’s something about reaching for a real book on the shelf, and blowing a small puff of dust off the top before opening–can’t do that with a digital version.

  • Richard Mansel 12:12 pm on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: calvinism. hell, ,   

    Revelation and Calvinism 

    It seems to me that Calvinism looks even worse in view of a study of Revelation. The accounts of the destruction of the wicked in Revelation are chilling.

    And another angel came out from the altar, who had power over fire, and he cried with a loud cry to him who had the sharp sickle, saying, “Thrust in your sharp sickle and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth, for her grapes are fully ripe.”  So the angel thrust his sickle into the earth and gathered the vine of the earth, and threw [it] into the great winepress of the wrath of God. And the winepress was trampled outside the city, and blood came out of the winepress, up to the horses’ bridles, for one thousand six hundred furlongs” (Revelation 14:18-20).

    How can we read such passages and think that God would punish people when they had no chance to choose righteousness? How could God elect certain people to doom, then destroy them with great violence and send them to Hell.

    I’ll never understand such a doctrine. It is completely foreign to what I read in Scripture.

     
  • Richard Mansel 10:57 am on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: hobbies,   

    Preachers and Hobbies 

    Neil Richey has a thought-provoking article today about preachers finding things to do outside of their jobs. God’s workers have been known to neglect their families, as well. We need to be like the common man in that we get sufficient rest, spend time with our families and take care of our health.

    Richey writes:

    I believe in preachers having hobbies, don’t you? No, I’m not talking about the “hobby horses” we are sometimes guilty of riding in the pulpit.

    I’m talking about the hobbies that provide temporary escapes from reality that give us a break from a life that absorbs us, virtually 24/7.

    Edgar De Witt Jones, in American Preachers of To-Day, quotes:

    I have no hobbies, except the hobby of work. I work about sixteen hours every day, and I work for work’s sake. I do not care anything about sports, waste no time on them. My exercise, my joy, my pleasure, my happiness, my progress, my amusement, are all found in the course of duty, in the field of service, at hard labor.

    I don’t believe in this for a moment. Nor, do I believe this philosophy to be biblical. My Lord thought it important to have some personal time. On one occasion, Jesus told his disciples, “…Come ye yourselves apart into a desert place, and rest a while.” Why, you ask? The Bible says, “…for there were many coming and going, and they had no leisure so much as to eat” (Mk. 6:31).

    Read More

    I enjoy writing, reading and watching football. Moreover, Pinterest is relaxing to me. What about you?

    The only guidelines would be that they…

    1. Do not take undue time from our families or ministry

    2. Are not too expensive

    3. Do not harm our influence as a Christian.

    4. Are not sinful.

    What thoughts do you have?

     
    • Ron Thomas 12:27 pm on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      For each man (or person in general) the down time or a time of relaxing is varied. My time is much different than it is with others, but it is just as warranted and necessary. I love what I do; it relaxes me greatly. During football season I enjoy the same thing you do. During the evening hours at home with my wife I am very relaxed and enjoy it very much. Your four points are very good.

      • Eugene Adkins 4:51 pm on May 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        I used to like playing paintball – but I ended up having no time.

        I work a “regular” 40 and then I have my preaching/congregational responsibilities. As of right now, I do at least 5 sermons a month, teach 8 classes a month, and give about 5 devotionals a month (this is based on a 4 week month). So when I get home from my “day job,” I start my “night job.”

        That all being said, I’m a husband and a father too!

        One thing that I had to learn was how to be content with little personal time. If a person in my situation doesn’t become content with this then they will go crazy and will get burned out on everything. Time managment is a MUST.

        So what do I do for fun??? Whatever the family wants to do :)

        • Ron Thomas 4:30 am on May 3, 2012 Permalink

          I appreciate your work, Eugene.

        • Stephen R. Bradd 4:55 pm on May 6, 2012 Permalink

          Before marriage I played golf a lot, bowled, listened to music frequently, painted & sold some artwork, shot billiards, played video games, and hung out with friends. Now, my “free time” is spent trying to keep up with, as Eugene put it, “whatever the family wants to do.” This is very enjoyable to me. Working hard as a preacher, husband, and father will keep me busy for the rest of my life, I think.

  • Richard Mansel 9:16 am on April 27, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , ,   

    Tidbits and Prayer Requests 

    Hello! I hope all of our readers are doing well. I wanted to share a potpourri of thoughts with you this Friday morning. We appreciate you very much.

    • It is a beautiful sunny day in Southeast Georgia. We ask your prayers that we can get some rain. Our drought is nothing like the Southwest has suffered, but we are double digits below normal for three years. It is sad to see so many ponds dry. Also, continue to pray for rain in the Southwest, they desperately need it.
    • I also ask your prayers for me as I continue battling a neurological condition. The pain has been especially bad, lately. I see a new neurologist in two weeks.
    • I read that the Baptists in Kentucky are having a symposium on Calvinism. They say that only one of the speakers is a Five-Point Calvinist. I wish they would figure out that the Baptist doctrine of salvation is Calvinist-Lite and return to the truth of Scripture on how to be saved.

    BTW, here is a shameless plug for my book on how to be saved.

    • On a lighter note, the 17 year-old son of one of my cousins didn’t know who John Wayne was. Moments like these seriously make you feel old. Likewise, I recently realized that in 2014 it will have been 20 years since I finished graduate school at Freed-Hardeman University. Time flies much too quickly.
    • I am listening to the Bible on digital audio. As I write, I am listening to Acts 11.
    • I am privileged to develop a manuscript on John 21 for the Southeast Georgia Lectureship at Richmond Hill. The lectureship is October 27-28. The last chapter of John is a fascinating study and I look forward to taking it apart and finding the treasures there.

    This Sunday morning I will be speaking on James 3:1, “My brethren, let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment.”

    Of this passage, Burton Coffman writes:

    “James did not seek to discourage any who might have been qualified for such work. As Harper suggested, ‘His words were meant to remind us of our responsibilities, rather than to deter us from our duties.’”

    We must not allow this passage to be a path of rationalization to avoid evangelism. We must all become more knowledgeable about Scripture. What thoughts do you have on this verse?

    For your reading:

     
    • J. Randal Matheny 12:57 pm on April 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Enjoyed this. Good quote there, too. Is the lectureship on the book of John? Will there be a book to come out of it?

      • Richard Mansel 1:03 pm on April 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Thank you. The congregation does put together a book of all the manuscripts. This year it will be on the last few chapters of John, looking at the last few days of Christ’s life. I think this will be the 8th or 9th year I’ve spoken there. Looking forward to it.

  • Richard Mansel 4:41 pm on April 20, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , opinions, polls   

    Societal Acceptance is not God’s Will 

    I am always dismayed when I hear of society falling back spiritually. Moral decline in the world today is no longer incremental. It is in pure free-fall.

    A school system in Alabama wants to change its policies so gender boundaries will be removed from what people wear. Like everything else in society, this is derived from a fear of being sued.

    A lawyer recently addressed a school board where he:

    “cited a case in Atlanta in which a male employee of the Georgia Assembly’s Office of Legislative Counsel was fired in 2007 after wearing women’s clothing to work.”

    SIGH

    When my children asked why ridiculous rules existed in schools or in society, my answer was always the same. Somewhere along the way, someone was afraid of getting sued. Our entire society is being ruled by paranoid political correctness.

    While the culture is traveling down the wormhole to hell and increasingly bizarre behavior is being rewarded, we must never think that God cares what they think. Before time and culture even existed, God had already decided what He believed and would accept (Psalm 119:89).

    God’s Word will never conform to culture. We can burrow deeper and deeper into the slime but God will never follow us. We must not even “think beyond what is written” (1 Corinthians 4:6). If God didn’t approve it in Scripture, then it will never be approved (Colossians 3:17).

    Today, we live under the law of the New Testament (Hebrews 9), not American law. God has NEVER taken a public opinion poll and He will never consult us for what we want (Exodus 20:3). We cannot change God or sway him to our side. God doesn’t need our opinions because He knows everything (1 John 3:20; Acts 17:25).

    Truth be told, even in heaven there isn’t any discussion of the issues. God the Father is always the final voice (John 14:10; 16:13). If Jesus and the Holy Spirit can’t alter’s God’s mind, why do we think we will?

    We must follow God, not men. End of story.

     
  • Richard Mansel 6:09 pm on April 19, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Satan Changes Our Focus 

    Satan has no interest in banishing Christianity. Read C.S. Lewis’ “Screwtape Letters.”

    Satan is perfectly content with having a form of religion around to lull people to sleep. However, he must make some changes until it is leading people down the road he has prepared (1 Peter 5:8).

    Satan changes our language, re-defines our words and alters our focus from Christ to ourselves. We become more worldly when Satan tells us that the world can’t be converted by holy people.

    Satan discredits Scripture and destroys God’s meanings for words such as grace, holiness, preaching, faith and repentance, replacing them with secular definitions.

    Satan creates a faux Christianity without God that focuses on slick promotions, incense, clothes, hairstyles, poetry, emotion and entertainment. His religion is empty and shallow, appealing to a worldly view of “spirituality.” Satan would rather us connect with a tree than with God.

    The Christian Chronicle published an article about a “Christian” movie called “Blue Like Jazz.”

    (More …)

     
  • Richard Mansel 3:43 pm on April 12, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    A Great Question 

    A man I am studying with asked a profound question: Why can’t people just open the Bible and do what it says?

    I wonder the same thing (2 Timothy 3:16-17; 1 Corinthians 4:6).

     
    • Eugene Adkins 6:11 am on April 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I was studying with a young couple who are friends about what the Bible simply teaches when it comes to becoming a Christian. The young woman also said something profound about a person’s willingness to obey the gospel (or the lack thereof, actually) after the study was over.She said, “We make it hard don’t we?” To which I replied, “Yes, we do. We don’t like to tell ourselves no because we don’t always like to change the way we’re living.” (Acts 24:25) Her comment reminded me about what it’s like to make that intial step of repentance that Jesus calls for through the Bible.

    • Stephen R. Bradd 3:30 pm on April 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Some do. May we be of that number!

      Within the past month, a woman I know from the area has left her “husband” & is living on her own. Though they both have strong feelings for each other, she has finally admitted to herself that she has no Biblical right to be with this man. I didn’t need to persuade her (though she appreciated being reassured–particularly when other “preachers” have advised her that there is nothing wrong with her current adulterous situation!)

      “Peace, peace!” where there is no peace–the shameful theme of many modern-day “preachers”!

  • Richard Mansel 2:24 pm on April 6, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: doctrines, , ,   

    Blind Doctrines 

    My April 3rd article at Forthright was entitled, Grace and Conversion as a follow-up to my March 27th article, Holy by Grace. In the Conversion article, I clearly established that we are saved by grace.

    I wrote:

    The death of Jesus was full of grace, being something that we have no right to be offered. “But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). His love, grace and mercy is solely responsible for the availability of salvation.

    Later in the article I wrote:

    Finally, we will be saved by works, indicating our allegiance and commitment (Revelation 20:11-15). Yet, when our lives are over, no matter how obedient we have been, we will still need grace to be saved (Luke 17:5-10).

    A reader commented and focused on the first sentence and overlooked the second. I established without any doubt that we cannot save ourselves. While obedience is a necessary part of salvation, we will still enter heaven solely by grace. However, the reader demanded to know how I could say we were saved by works.

    It is always troubling when someone’s doctrinal mindset is beset by blindness. If we have to ignore entire passages of Scripture in order to reconcile our own beliefs, we have serious problems.

    Simply put, either the same Holy Spirit wrote both Ephesians 2:8-9 and Revelation 20:11-15 or they didn’t. Either they are both inspired or neither are (2 Timothy 3:16-17). We can either accept both as true and keep studying until we figure out how they work together or we simply dismiss one or both of them. However, ignoring Scripture puts us at great peril (John 12:48).

    Revelation 20:11-15 is Scripture and inspired. Therefore, it is true. God said:

    And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God, and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books.

    We study and obey or we dismiss it and call God a liar.

    In Romans 5, the text says we are “justified by faith” (Romans 5:1) and we are “justified by His blood” (Romans 5:9). Just like before, we can either accept both or pick and choose whichever one best suits us.

    I prefer to keep studying and reconcile them since I believe Scripture is inspired by God.

    We are justified by the blood of Christ so that we can approach God for salvation (Romans 5:6-11). When we stand before God, we are justified because we have the blood of Christ on our souls. However, we are also justified by faith.

    Our faith and our works show our allegiance and commitment to God (James 2:20-26). We remain with Christ because we are serving Him. However, these works do not ultimately save us because that can only happen by grace and the blood of Christ (Luke 17:5-10).

    It is simple and complicated at the same time. The reader needs to see the larger picture rather than blindly focusing in one thing and ignoring everything else.

     
  • Richard Mansel 9:39 am on April 5, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    The Dark Life 

    If you surround yourself with darkness, don’t be surprised that you have trouble seeing the light.

    Then Jesus spoke to them again, saying, “I am the light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but have the light of life.” (John 8:12).

     
  • Richard Mansel 10:34 am on April 4, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Watching Young Preachers Grow 

    We have a young preacher, Rico Robinson, who is preaching our Gospel Meeting this week. He is 24 and beginning a new work. He has grown and matured the past few years and I am proud of him. We have had other young preachers that we support and they are special people.

    At our congregation, we train preachers, in a way. The last Sunday night of each month, one of our men preaches. On most Wednesday nights, one of our men does the invitation and on most fourth Sundays, they do the sermon at the Nursing Home. They teach an adult class at VBS and fill-in when the adult class teacher is gone.

    When I am out of town, we never have to go elsewhere looking for fill-in’s. We have several men who are perfectly capable of doing so. These men are really talented.

    Congregations need to be training men to preach and serve. Give them opportunities to grow. Preachers don’t need to be so insecure that we feel threatened by them. This is about the Lord’s church, not us.

    Talk to and support young preachers. Pass lessons along to them. Now that I have preached full-time for 17 years, I have wisdom that I can share with those who stand where I once stood.

    I’ve been fired and told to quite preaching. Yet, I persevered through these challenges and serious health problems. I can share that with young preachers and help them and their families.

    Will you do the same?

     
    • Jimsjn 12:07 pm on April 5, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Bro Richard

      Re: Wisdom

      Just wait until you have 35-40 years of preaching and see how much wisdom has increased. I am 66 and am amazed at the wisdom acquired from 55-65. I now pray for anotehr 15 years in the pulpit and teaching. Regarding wisdom and elders, I am of the firm conviction that no man should be appointed as an elder until he is 50. A friend of mine was just appointed as an elder. He is 72. Essentially the elders that are there were not!

      Keep the faith

      Jim

  • Richard Mansel 10:00 pm on April 3, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: disability, ,   

    Recognize Your Limitations 

    Expectations and what our bodies will allow are frequently in conflict.

    Someone expects us to get a certain level of work done and we are fearful that we cannot meet that goal. As a result, our fight or flight response elevates our blood pressure and our bodies experience great stress. In time, they begin to break down from the overload of chemicals in our bodies.

    These expectations can be deadly if we do not manage them properly. We do that through exercise, breathing techniques, quiet time and connecting with God in prayer and Bible study. We rise above the stressors and find calm through Christ (Psalm 37:14; Psalm 46:10).

    We must realize our limitations. We can only do what we can do. For those who suffer from health problems, this is even more pronounced. We constantly feel guilty if we are not able to do as much as we need to do. Yet, we cannot help our families or our Lord if we can’t function at all.

    We must learn to pace ourselves and place ourselves in God’s hands (Matthew 11:28-30). Being honest with ourselves and with those around us is a scary proposition. We don’t want to disappoint others. Nevertheless, doing the best you can with 60% is better than falling far short of 100 %

    We work smarter, not harder and within the limitations of our bodies. This requires great trust in God (Hebrews 11:6). We must also realize that fallible humans are not as understanding as our infallible God.

    However, we only need to be concerned with what we can control, as frightening as that sounds. This requires a lot of faith!

    Finally, those who depend on us may have to change their expectations and allow us to reorient ourselves to our new reality.

    Health problems are what they are and they create new parameters that we must live within or face perpetual frustrations and failures. The choice seems clear.

    Trust yourself and be hones with what you can do. However, we must be courageous not to sell ourselves short. Pushing towards our limits builds character. Yet, we cannot become carried away.

    Be wise in everything.

     
  • Richard Mansel 10:36 am on March 31, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: grandmothers, mothers, , , ,   

    Be Careful What You Say 

    Early in my preaching career, I realized that I must be careful the way I phrase things in order to be sensitive to the needs of the audience.

    For example, on Mother’s Day, I always remember that not all women can be Mothers. In our exuberance to praise Mothers we can say something that will harm the childless.

    Imagine being a childless Mother who hears the preacher say that God blesses godly women with children. The obvious conclusion is that she doesn’t have children because she is a sinner. Where does Scripture say that?

    We can inadvertently say things that can offend people if we do not consider the larger implications of our words.

    When I prepare a power point presentation, which are largely images, I give thought to how something can be taken. In our writing we must always consider this. Sometimes, I fail and people get offended. I apologize to them. But the better path is to try to prevent it from happening in the beginning.

    We cannot always know what will offend people. In an audience, there are many people’s whose lives consist of events and scars that the preacher cannot possibly know.

    Naturally, we can say things that cause harm without intention. Nevertheless, we can give every consideration to what we can control, in this area.

    On Facebook, I just saw a quote that is intended to praise Mothers and Grandmothers. The quote is: The Best Moms Get Promoted to Grandmas.” That is sweet but doesn’t hold a shred of evidence in the real world. Accordingly, I would caution any speaker from using it in a lesson.

    Countless Mothers have children who either die, are infertile or choose not to have children. What does it accomplish to brand these women as bad mothers? How does that help spread the Gospel and help anyone get to heaven? In fact, it may impede their spirituality!

    Let us be careful what we say and use our tongue and pen wisely (James 3:1-12).

     
    • Glenda Williams 11:14 am on March 31, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      So very true. “Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O Lord, my strength, and my redeemer” (Psalm 19:14).

    • Eugene Adkins 12:07 pm on March 31, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I understand what you mean, Richard. One way that I address the situation on Mother’s and Father’s day is that I remind everyone that there are people, young and old, who need mother and father figures in there life (Romans 16:13 & Exodus 18:13-24).

  • Richard Mansel 9:00 am on March 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Listening to the Bible 

    A few months ago, I downloaded a digital audio book of the complete NKJV on the laptop. I listen to it when I am at the office and not studying. I’m honored that I was able to listen to the entire Old Testament for the first time. It is 46 hours long which shows just how long the OT really is. I’ve listened to the NT dozens of times but every time is fresh and wonderful. I am enjoying Matthew right now.

    I hope to listen to the entire Bible two more times this year, which is a blessing. The entire book is 60 hours, so it takes awhile. :)

    We have so many tools to use in Bible Study. Yet, brethren may study less than at any time since the Restoration began. Few things are as sad as that.

    Study the Word!

     
    • Steve 9:09 pm on March 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, would you mind sharing your source for the digital audio book? Do I understand the OT is 46 hours and the entire Bible recording is 60 hours? I have been in other folks outer buildings ( like a shop, garage or barn) and they make a point to leave on their religious music 24/7. However I would welcome the opportunity to offer God’s Word 24/7 in our greenhouse area.

      • Richard Mansel 9:21 pm on March 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        You can go to Amazon and put in the particular version you like and audio digital or CD and find your options. Here is the one I own:

        http://tinyurl.com/78mx9l7

        There is a negative review because the audio book is divided in 16 sections and you can’t go to specific passages. Yet, if you want continuous play, it will be great. You would just have to click the next track after a few hours.

        • Steve 9:25 pm on March 30, 2012 Permalink

          Thank you so much!

  • Richard Mansel 2:02 pm on March 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    There are a lot of people who want better doorknobs without figuring out how to get a door. A doorknob is useless without a door. If we have faulty thought patterns, we remain confused and will never find what we are looking for. In fact, we can unknowingly prevent ourselves from finding it and then complain that it doesn’t exist.

    Brethren say that we cannot use denominational books and materials but then fail to understand where those materials come from. We refuse to support sound brethren to write full-time to produce scholarly works. Then we lament the lack of great books written by brethren.

    I don’t understand this at all. Why can’t people make the connections here? I have been wondering this for many years and I still don’t have an answer.

    Why can’t we allow qualified brethren to write full-time to produce quality writing? How can we convert the world if we do not have the books, tracts and materials to teach? If we refuse to do it, our only options are to use the writing of false teachers, which we cannot do.

    This is called a vicious circle that goes nowhere.

     
    • Mike Riley 4:52 pm on March 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, I don’t understand this scenario either. I produce Bible-related materials for both the adult Bible class that I teach on Sunday as well as the sermons that I present. If I can do it (without an advanced degree), anyone can do it with a modicum of Bible knowledge.

      • Richard Mansel 5:02 pm on March 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        I was looking at a spectrum of work. We need popular writing, devotional writing, good commentaries that range from basic to the highest technical level. The latter likely requires advanced studies. The degree angle must be understood in context. Thanks for helping me clarify, brother.

  • Richard Mansel 12:36 pm on March 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    Posts on Grace 

    I appreciate all the good thoughts on grace! Thanks for taking up my question and making application.

    I have always liked the following: We cannot live in such a way to put God in our debt. Therefore, we will always be lost without His generous gift of grace. We are completely at His mercy until given an opportunity to serve. Even then, we will still require grace to enter heaven. Once again, God will never be in our debt.

    There are so many nuances that exist in the doctrine and emotion NEVER understands nuance. That is why we must remain sober-minded and focused so we can grasp the real meaning of Scripture.

    We have to tune out Satan’s doctrines found in those who teach error and not spend all of our time chasing them. That is part of Satan’s plan. We cannot always be teaching against something. We need to be proactive in showing the world and the brethren what Scripture DOES teach on grace and salvation.

     

     
  • Richard Mansel 10:15 pm on March 27, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Where Do We Stand on Grace? 

    Forthright has published an article about grace two days in a row. Randal Matheny had one on March 26 entitled, The Great Explanation. He wrote:

    In recent times, out of necessity, Christians have had to emphasize the steps to salvation, and great good has been done through studies about faith, repentance, baptism, and obedience. This emphasis has been due to the false teachings about how we ought to respond to the grace of God.

    My article on March 27 was called, Holy by Grace. I discuss the role grace has in salvation and holiness. I speak and write frequently about grace and feel it is absolutely essential to an understanding of salvation.

    For years, few in the brotherhood spoke about grace, except in error. Because of that error, most sound brethren were spooked about the subject or were afraid of being labeled. Whatever the reason, grace was largely missing from our pulpits and no doubt brethren suffered in the pews.

    The word seemingly became a code word for liberalism. However, no one needs to be afraid of what God’s Word says about grace. We can be sound and still refute false teaching on the subject.

    I remember hearing as a young man that false teachers were saying that we had no part in our salvation and that if we contribute anything, then it is a denial of grace. They still teach this in the church, sadly.

    While they were right to one extent, they missed the fuller picture. They needed the rest of the story because obedience cannot be denied even in a system of grace (Ephesians 2:10; John 14:15; Revelation 20:11-15).

    Thankfully, more are teaching and preaching about grace in the Lord’s Church. That is wonderful.

    My question is, where do you think the brotherhood stands on the subject? Are we, in a collective sense, still somewhat afraid of the subject?

    Are we ever hesitant to use the word grace for fear of being labeled? I hope we are past that now. People do teach error on grace but we should not lump the truth on grace in with their false teachings. Satan wants truth silenced so his voice is the only one heard. Let us never be a contributor to helping Satan!

     
    • Eugene Adkins 6:24 am on March 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I can’t speak for where everyone stands on grace, but I know I want to “stand” in it! (Romans 5:2; 1 Peter 5:12)

      One thing that I always try to do when I talk about God’s grace to others is to make sure they understand that they cannot earn it but also that there is a personal responsibility to respond to it. Titus 2:11,12 and Titus 3:5 are excellent places for teaching this.

      How great is the depth of God’s grace? To be honest, I think we struggle to comprehend it, but that doesn’t mean we can’t accept and enjoy it (http://wp.me/p20YNR-4Z).

      Great question to get the morning going with Randal!

      • Eugene Adkins 6:27 am on March 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Sorry :( I meant to say Richard. The morning was just starting to go…

      • Stephen R. Bradd 9:37 am on March 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Good thoughts brothers. I enjoyed the article you linked to Eugene.

      • Weylan Deaver 11:52 am on March 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Good thoughts. In the nature of the case, salvation must be by grace, since God does not owe it to us. It is not owed because the wages of sin is death. And, if it is not owed, then, if it is given at all, it must be by grace. However, grace in no way rules out obedience to God’s terms for receiving grace. God could give us a checklist of 1,000 things to do each day for the rest of our lives and salvation would still be by grace. For years, the denominational world has offered the unbiblical concept that obedience and grace are incompatible, which is completely foreign to the way the New Testament approaches the subject.

    • Charlton rhinehart 10:13 pm on March 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I was raised in the church, and I was flooded with teachings on grace and deprived of the basic Bible teachings the coc was founded to restore. The interesting part is I know that more than half of the churches across America also are this way, because the teachers in my “home church” we’re taught this view from the major coc universities. I have been to many conservative and even some extreme conservative churches since, but I have yet to find one that will not give God’s grace credit for our salvation. Grace is far too clear in scripture to miss. I am under 30, so I was raised in different times than most, but I have to disagree that we are ashamed of grace. As you can probably tell, I am opposed to those who abuse grace, but even I enjoy teaching on it because I want to see it taught in truth. I have never met a preacher that is afraid to mention grace, but I am proud of the preachers that choose their words carefully when teaching on it. We should be cautious when teaching on grace so as to not imply it is obtainable without obedience and repentance. Just because we teach the whole truth, does not mean we are ashamed of grace, nor does it mean we discredit it.  I see many of the churches giving in to the worlds view of grace, but very few standing for God’s truth on grace.

  • Richard Mansel 9:14 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Boom! 

    We felt and heard a loud boom in Southeast Georgia at 8:30 AM this morning. I went outside and looked around because I thought the building might come down. It was felt an hour away in two directions. Stations in Savannah are working on figuring out what it was.

    It is very disconcerting when something like this happens. It reminds me that a final day will come (Revelation 20:11-14). As today, we will be going about our lives and suddenly it will wake us from our routine and stupor. With certainty, a price will have to be paid when the Lord returns with a boom (2 Thessalonians 5:1-6; 1 :7-8; 1 Corinthians 15:50-52, et al).

    Will we be ready?

     
    • J. Randal Matheny 9:20 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, you live, as do we and the Taubaté residents, in a military area. I suspect in both instances that may likely be the explanation. Good link to the last day.

      • Richard Mansel 9:25 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        That seems the most likely explanation but that has been checked and that wasn’t it. No one knows, yet. Savannah TV stations and others are trying to track it down. It was felt too far away for it to be from the base. Thanks, brother.

        • J. Randal Matheny 9:35 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink

          Ah, OK, nobody here even mentions the army base as a possibility. Loud silence, know what I mean?

        • Richard Mansel 10:39 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink

          “Air Force & GEMA confirms loud boom was a sonic boom from Air Force pilots training off the coast of Brunswick.” We are an Army area. We don’t think of the Air Force here.

      • Richard Mansel 9:37 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        A lot of things are being considered. We hear artillery here all the time but this didn’t sound like what we are accustomed to. I understand what you mean. :)

  • Richard Mansel 8:30 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: doorknocking,   

    Is doorknocking becoming outdated? 

    We used to go door knocking in our area but for various reasons we stopped and changed our focus to another area of evangelism. Increasingly, we were seeing signs on people’s doors with some reference to people going door to door. People no longer want to be bothered, it seems. One community near Detroit, Michigan is considering a step in that direction.

     After the murder of an 80-year-old woman in her home last fall, the City of Royal Oak is looking into possibly adopting a so-called community “no knock” list in an attempt to tighten the limits on door-to-door solicitors. WWJ Newsradio 950 spoke with Royal Oak City Attorney Dave Gillam. “A homeowner would have the ability to have their name and address put on that list. And, essentially, that would make it illegal or unlawful for a solicitor to approach someone at that address for commercial purposes,” Gilliam said.

    Can you see this becoming a standard law? I can. Mass media is the wave of future but it lacks that personal touch that face to face interaction brings. What do you think is the answer?

     
    • J. Randal Matheny 8:37 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      My friend Eddie Lawson and others seem to demonstrate well that door-to-door still works.

    • Steve 9:01 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Fortunately, such ordinancrs are unconstitutional. As you know, there is a strong history of courts, specifically the US Supreme Court, upholding the rights of individuals to engage in door-to-door solicitation, no matter the purpose. Most recently, in Watchtower Society v. Village of Stratton, 536 U.S. 150 (2002), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in an 8-1 decision that that the requirement of the Village of Stratton’s ordinance for solicitors to “register” before engaging in door-to-door solicitation violated the First Amendment. The Court stated “it is offensive, not only to the values protected by the First Amendment, but to the very notion of a free society, that in the context of everyday public discourse a citizen must first inform the government of their desire to speak to her neighbors and then obtain a permit to do so.” In making its decision, the court affirmed several other previous decisions that supported canvassing as a constitutionally protected activity, citing specifically Schneider V. New Jersey and Martin V. City of Struthers.

    • Charla 10:11 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Wow, it’s really very sad that it’s coming down to this. Our church just recently restarted doorknocking as a form of outreach and we’ve had great results from it. If this blooms into a new thing, God forbid, it will only have negative consequences in the end, shutting us off even more from human and local interaction and making us that much more media dependent.

    • Eugene Adkins 4:13 pm on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I have gone door knocking by myself because I couldn’t get anyone to go with me…everyone seems to think that it’s useless; but I have other reasons for why I think people don’t like to knock on doors though.

      But one thing I do know for sure is that the JW’s do it because it works! They may get 95 doors slammed in their face, but they’ll get 5 studies from it.

  • Richard Mansel 7:48 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    New Heaven and New Earth 

    I am looking for your insight into a difficult passage. It seems obvious to me that this discusses heaven. However, there are two parts of this passage that are difficult.  I accept the later date for Revelation so I don’t know what advocates of the destruction of Jerusalem interpretation believe about this scene.

    Ogden says, “The new Jerusalem is the bride of Christ, the Lamb’s wife” [p. 377].

    Others take these verses to mean that heaven will be on a reconstituted earth.

    The text says:

    “Now I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea. Then I, John, saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband” (Revelation 21:1-2, NKJV).

    The questions for you are:

    1. What is being discussed here? Heaven or something else?

    2. What is the new heaven and the new earth?

    3. What does “come down” mean in this context?

    Thank you for your sharing your knowledge with me. God Bless.

     
    • Brad 10:42 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard,

      It cannot be heaven, because it comes down out of heaven. Speaking of heavens and earth being destroyed or shaken was a symbol of the end of a system (usually governmental), see Joel 2:10-11, 28-32. Thus it would be no surprise that a new heaven and new earth would describe a God’s new system (where Christ is the king).

      Also, John is shown New Jerusalem, and it is called the Lamb’s bride. The church is the bride of Christ (the Lamb).

      Also in this chapter, it describes God’s presence “among men” (verse 3), compare this with Christ being in the presence of the church in chapter 1.

    • Ashby 10:17 pm on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Hi Richard,

      Please bear with me while I fill in some background to my response. Much of it may be “old news” to you, but I think it will help to clarify my understanding of the text you asked about. I do not regularly visit this blog and am not familiar with its ground rules, so if I have violated something in submitting a post of this length please forgive me. (I fear the formatting for the diagrams may mess up, but it was worth a shot.)

      The O.T. ends on a note of unfulfilled hope. It was clear that in one sense God always had ruled the world from the time of creation. He was on his heavenly throne (e.g., Ps. 11:4; Isa. 6:1) and reigned over all (e.g., 1 Chron. 16:31; Ps. 93:1, 96:10). But there was some sense in which his kingly rule was not being fully expressed. He was allowing creation to go on out of step with his ultimate intention for it, to continue in a state of sin and suffering that was contrary to his ultimate purpose and vision.

      But the prophets saw that a day was coming in which God would express his rulership of creation in such a way that all things would be brought into harmony and conformity with his ultimate will and purpose. His creation would be redeemed from the dreadful consequences of sin that had invaded it. This world of rebellion, sin, hostility, fragmentation, suffering, and death would be rescued by God, transformed by him into a true utopia, a perfect reality of love, joy, and eternal fellowship with God and one another. Craig Bartholomew and Michael Goheen write in The Drama of Scripture: Finding Our Place in the Biblical Story (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004), 122:

      “The people of Israel thought of history being comprised of two very distinct periods: the present age and the age to come. In the present age, which had begun with Adam’s rebellion against God’s rule, the whole of creation had been stained by sin. Inevitably, therefore, evil would continue to flourish in the world throughout the present age, even among God’s own people of Israel, who had been called out to provide the solution to that evil. But in the age to come, God would intervene to cleanse and renew his creation.”

      On that day God would express his authority over creation in a way he was not doing at present; he would in his sovereign power bring his creation to its ultimate fulfillment. At that time, he *will* be king over all the earth (Zech. 14:9) in a manner unlike the present. Robert Saucy states in “The Eschatology of the Bible” in Frank E. Gaebelein, ed., The Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979) 1:105:

      “According to the Scriptures, there is a sense in which God has always ruled and is even now the King over all creation (1 Chron 29:11, 12: Ps 103:19; 145:13). But there is another thread of truth that views the kingdom as yet to come (Zech. 14:9; Mat. 6:10). It is this last theme that dominates the eschatological hope of Scripture. . . . While [God] rules over the affairs of the earth with nothing occurring apart from his permissive will, he has allowed sin and rebellion to enter history and Satan to have a certain dominance as the ‘god of this age’ (2 Cor 4:4). God’s rule might be said therefore to be over the earth, but not directly on the earth. It is the coming of God to establish this latter condition, to bring his kingdom to earth in the vindication of his sovereign holiness, that has constituted the hope of God’s people throughout all time.”

      As I. Howard Marshall expresses it in Jesus the Savior (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1990), 218, “[T]he [kingdom of God] is the full and powerful manifestation of the sovereignty that God already exercises over the world.”

      The O.T. uses different imagery to refer to this blessed state that God is going to create. The imagery varies in how sharply it distinguishes the blessed state from this present existence, but all of it says, in forms relevant to ancient Jews, that a time of divine blessing is coming. It says that the failures and sufferings of the present age would be put to rights by the coming of the new age. Sometimes the O.T. speaks of (e.g., Isaiah 2, 11, 25, 51:6, 61, 65:17-25; Jeremiah 31; Daniel 7, 12; Amos. 9:13-15; Micah 4; Joel 2) the restoration of Israel to greatness and of the coming of a new king like the great king David; God’s healing the world’s sicknesses and hatreds; God’s people being freed from oppression; renewed prosperity and justice for the poor; war and weapons of war being abolished; death being swallowed up and tears being wiped away; alienation between God and man being removed; God’s Spirit being poured out in a new way; and a new heaven and a new earth.

      In the first century, Israel was weak, poor, and under the rule of pagans (the Romans). Graeme Goldsworthy writes in According to Plan: The Unfolding Revelation of God in the Bible (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1991), 196, “The return from exile results in only a pale shadow of the predicted glorious kingdom for the people of God.” Thomas Schreiner states in New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008), 44-45:

      “The prophets promised a new creation, a new temple, a new covenant, and a new king. The exile would be over, and the wilderness would bloom.
      “The great promises in the prophets, however, were not fulfilled when the exile ended in 536 B.C. Israel did return from Babylon and a temple was built, yet the temple was insignificant in comparison to the Solomonic temple. Nor was the nation enjoying glorious prosperity, the kind of glory envisioned in Isa. 40-66. Israel was small, struggling, and under the oppression of former powers. Ezra, Nehemiah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi document the low spiritual state of the nation. Nor did matters improve in the four hundred years before the coming of Jesus of Nazareth. Israel was a pawn in the struggle between the Ptolemies and the Seleucids. A brief period of freedom dawned with the Hasmoneans in the second and first centuries BC, but the interlude was brief, and soon the Romans swept in and subjugated Israel, appointing the Herodians and procurators to rule the land.”

      The people longed and prayed for the coming of God, for his final intervention when he would set all things right and rule in the fullest sense to the blessing of his people. In Mk. 15:43 Joseph of Arimathea is described as one who was “waiting for the kingdom of God” (TNIV). He was waiting for that state in which God expresses his sovereignty by “heavenizing” creation, by transforming this fallen creation into the divine utopia, into an eternal state of love, joy, peace, and ultimate fellowship.

      It was into that religious, social, and political environment that Jesus came saying, “The time is fulfilled; the kingdom of God is at hand” (Mk. 1:15) and “But if it is by the Spirit of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you” (Mat. 12:28) and “for behold, the kingdom of God is among you [in your midst]” (Lk. 17:21b). Jesus came announcing the arrival of God’s final intervention in history, the ultimate expression of his kingly rule on the world. David Wenham writes in The Parables of Jesus (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1989), 25:

      “To sum up: in proclaiming the kingdom of God, Jesus was announcing the coming of God’s revolution and of God’s new world, as promised in the Old Testament. God was at last intervening, Jesus declared, to establish his reign over everything, to bring salvation to his people and renewal and reconciliation to the world. But fortunately Jesus did not announce his message in such general theological terms; he announced it primarily through vivid, concrete parables.”

      This naturally created excitement in some quarters and suspicion and opposition in others. It also led to misunderstanding because of incorrect ideas the Jews had about the coming and nature of the kingdom of God. Many of them thought the kingdom would arrive through or in conjunction with human military conquest, and more specifically, through or in conjunction with the expulsion of the Romans and their supporters from Palestine. But as Wenham notes (p. 23):

      “Jesus had in mind a bigger revolution than that: God’s revolution was to be a total revolution overthrowing Satan and evil and bringing earth and heaven back in harmony, and this would not be accomplished by force of arms, but – unbelievably so far as the disciples were concerned, and who blames them? – through suffering and death.”

      They also expected the kingdom to come suddenly and decisively. They thought God’s final intervention would be a one-shot deal – the Day of the Lord – where the old age would be terminated abruptly and the new, glorious age would begin. Recall Lk. 19:11 where the people supposed that the kingdom of God was to appear immediately upon Jesus’ arrival in Jerusalem. That aspect of their thinking has been diagrammed as follows (Wenham, 63):

      The day of
      The Lord
      |
      |
      _______________________________________
      The old age The new age

      This caused people to wonder how Jesus could be ushering in the kingdom of God when the hallmarks of the old age – death, decay, suffering, etc. – still were present. Even John the Baptist began to question as he sat in Herod’s jail whether Jesus was in fact the one who would bring in the kingdom of God (Mat. 11:2-3; Lk. 7:18-19).

      Jesus explained in a number of parables (and elsewhere) that the kingdom comes in two stages. It is introduced or inaugurated, then there is an interval of time, and then there is a decisive intervention when the kingdom is consummated or finalized. Samuel Mikolaski states in “The Theology of the New Testament” in Frank E. Gaebelein, ed., The Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979) 1:471:

      “While Scripture recognizes the reign of God as being eternal, it acknowledges that his sovereignty in the evil-infected world is only partial. Scripture declares that God’s universal reign will be achieved at Christ’s second advent. This reign, however, has already broken into history in the incarnation, death, resurrection, and ascension of Christ.”

      Preben Vang and Terry Carter state in Telling God’s Story: The Biblical Narrative from Beginning to End (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2006), 199:

      “According to Jesus, the kingdom of God is already here. Jesus inaugurated it! The “age to come” has broken into the “present age.” God is making his presence felt already now. Yet the kingdom of God is not here in full. Evil still exists. God does not yet fill “all in all” (1 Cor. 15:28). This will only happen at the time of consummation when Christ comes back. We now live between the times. The promised “age to come” has already begun but is not here in full. The “old age” is still here as well.”

      Wenham (p. 63) diagrams the concept like this:

      Jesus’ Jesus’
      coming second coming
      | |
      | |
      ————————————————————————–
      | The kingdom of God |
      | |
      | |
      —————————————————-
      The old age of Satan

      There are texts in addition to the parables that indicate the kingdom of God is a present reality between the first and second comings of Jesus Christ, and there are texts in addition to the parables that indicate the kingdom of God is a future hope. Thus, Robert Stein writes in Walter A. Elwell, ed., The Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1996), 453:

      “The kingdom of God is both now and not yet. Thus the kingdom of God is “realized” and present in one sense, and yet . . . future in another sense. This is not a contradiction but simply the nature of the kingdom. The kingdom has come in fulfillment of the Old Testament promises. A new covenant has been established. But its final manifestation and consummation lie in the future. Until then, we are to be good and faithful servants (Luke 19:11-27).”

      It is at Christ’s return that the redemption he began nearly 2,000 years ago will come to completion. That is the time when in Rev. 11:15 the heavenly voices say, “The kingdom of the world has become the kingdom of our Lord and of his Christ, and he shall reign forever and ever.” And that is the time when in Rev. 11:17 the twenty-four elders say, “We give thanks to you, Lord God Almighty, who is and who was, for you have taken your great power and begun to reign.” At Christ’s return, the kingdom he inaugurated with his first coming will be consummated or finalized.

      This expectation is what is behind Peter’s statement in Acts 3:20-21 that Christ must remain in heaven “until the time comes for God to restore everything, as he promised long ago through his holy prophets” (TNIV). And it is the coming of the kingdom in this consummated sense for which Jesus instructed the disciples to pray in Mat. 6:10: “Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.”

      The resurrection of the dead (and transformation of the living) will occur when the Lord returns (1 Cor. 15:20-26, 51-54; Phil. 3:20-21; 1 Thess. 4:13-16; 1 Jn. 3:2). Both believers and unbelievers, the saved and the condemned, will be raised to life at that time (Dan. 12:2; Jn. 5:28-29; Acts 24:14-15; see also, Mat. 25:31-46 and Rev. 20:11-15). Note that sometimes a reference to the resurrection relates exclusively to the resurrection of the redeemed, what Jesus calls in Lk. 14:14 “the resurrection of the righteous.”

      It is important to understand that in the resurrection at Christ’s return the body will be restored to life (or transformed in the case of those living on earth at the time – 1 Cor. 15:50-52; 1 Thess. 4:13-17). In other words, the resurrection is not about the mere post-death survival of the spirit or soul. That is simply death, not victory over death! See, e.g., (Rom. 8:11, 8:23; Phil. 3:20-21; 1 Corinthians 15 (esp. vv. 20-23, 42-44, 49); Jn. 5:28-29; 2 Tim. 2:18). On the other hand, the resurrection body is not simply a resuscitated natural body. Rather, our natural body will be transformed into a supernatural body, what Paul in 1 Cor. 15:44 calls a “spiritual body.” Note that Paul does not say the dead body is raised “a spirit”; he says it is raised “a spiritual body.” The contrast is not between a physical/material body and a spiritual body but between a natural body and a spiritual body. Resurrection bodies are “spiritual” not in the sense of being nonphysical (made of spirit), which would be an oxymoron given the inherent physicalness of the word “body,” but in the sense of being supernatural, in the sense they are imperishable, glorious, and powerful. This is recognized by a broad range of scholars.

      1 Cor. 15:50 does not bar all things physical from entering the eternal state. Paul there says, “Now I say this, brothers, that flesh and blood is not able to inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable.” He is referring to flesh and blood as presently constituted, that is, as subject to weakness, decay, and death. He was not saying that a natural body that was miraculously transformed into a supernatural (“spiritual”) body (being imperishable, glorious, powerful, and immortal) could not, in some sense, be said to consist of flesh and bone (or blood). Indeed, Christ’s resurrection body was a transformed body that was no longer subject to death (Rom. 6:9), but the Lord still described it in Lk. 24:39 as “flesh and bones.” And our lowly bodies will be transformed so that they will be like his glorious body (Phil. 3:21).

      The idea that Christians will spend eternity with God as spirits in some nonphysical realm has seeped into much Christian thinking, but it is wrong. Listen to how N. T. Wright states it in Surprised By Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection and the Mission of the Church (New York: Harper Collins, 2008), 194:

      “Mention salvation, and almost all Western Christians assume that you mean going to heaven when you die. But a moment’s thought, in the light of all we have said so far, reveals that this simply cannot be right. Salvation means, of course, rescue. But what are we ultimately to be rescued from? The obvious answer is death. But if, when we die, all that happens is that our bodies decompose while our souls (or whatever other word we want to use for our continuing existence) go on elsewhere, this doesn’t mean we’ve been rescued from death. It simply means that we’ve died.
      “And if God’s good creation – of the world, of life as we know it, of our glorious and remarkable bodies, brains, and bloodstreams – really is good, and if God wants to reaffirm that goodness in a wonderful act of new creation at the last, then to see the death of the body and the escape of the soul as salvation is not simply slightly off course, in need of a few subtle alterations and modifications. It is totally and utterly wrong. It is colluding with death. It is conniving at death’s destruction of God’s good, image-bearing human creatures while consoling ourselves with the (essentially non-Christian and non-Jewish) thought that the really important bit of ourselves is saved from this wicked, nasty body and this sad, dark world of space, time, and matter! As we have seen, the whole of the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, speaks out against such nonsense. It is, however, what most Western Christians, including most Bible Christians of whatever sort, actually believe. This is a serious state of affairs, reinforced not only in popular teaching but also in liturgies, public prayers, hymns, and homilies of every kind.”

      Roger Olson writes in The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity and Diversity (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002) 311, 314:

      “The bodily resurrection of all people at some time after death has played a prominent role in Christian teaching throughout history. In spite of a pronounced tendency among untutored lay Christians to focus attention on immortality of souls and neglect bodily resurrection, the fathers of the church, medieval Christian thinkers, all the Protestant Reformers and faithful modern biblical scholars and theologians have emphasized the bodily resurrection as the blessed hope of believers in Christ. . . .
      “It would be impossible to discover any single point of greater agreement in the history of Christian thought than this one: the future bodily resurrection of the dead is the blessed hope of all who are in Christ Jesus by faith. Over two millennia the church’s leaders and faithful theologians have unanimously taught this above the immortality of souls and as more important than some ethereal intermediate state between bodily death and bodily resurrection when Christ returns. And yet, as we lamented earlier, it seems that the vast majority of Christians do not know this and neglect belief in bodily resurrection in favor of belief in immediate post-mortem heavenly, spiritual existence as ghost-like beings (or even angels!) ‘forever with the Lord in heaven.’”

      Not only will our bodies be transformed to be suitable for eternity with God, but all of creation will be transformed, as Paul explains in Rom. 8:18-23. According to Eph. 1:7-10, God’s will for the handling of the end of history, his will for the management of the completion of the ages, is to unify heaven and earth in Christ. The eternal state, which will come about in conjunction with Christ’s return, will be a redeemed and transformed creation, a “heavenized” creation from which sin and all its consequences have been expunged. The curse will have been lifted (Rev. 22:3), and creation itself will have been freed from its slavery to decay (Rom. 8:20-21). It is what the Bible calls the new heavens and new earth (2 Pet. 3:13; Rev. 21:1-3; see also, Isa. 65:17, 66:22), the divine utopia in which Christians will dwell forever in resurrection bodies and in which there will be no evil, no death, no mourning, no crying, and no pain (Rev. 21:1-4). As Wayne Grudem states in Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994), 613:

      “We as resurrected men and women will live forever in “new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells” (2 Pet. 3:13). We will live in a renewed earth that ‘will be set free from its bondage to decay’ (Rom. 8:21) and become like a new Garden of Eden. . . . In this very material, physical, renewed universe, it seems that we will need to live as human beings with physical bodies, suitable for life in God’s renewed physical creation. Specifically, Jesus’ physical resurrection body affirms the goodness of God’s original creation of man not as a mere spirit like the angels, but as a creature with a physical body that was ‘very good.’ We must not fall into the error of thinking that nonmaterial existence is somehow a better form of existence for creatures: when God made us as the pinnacle of his creation, he gave us physical bodies.”

      “Within the Protestant world, there has been disagreement as to whether the earth is to be destroyed completely and replaced, or just changed and renewed” (Grudem, 1160). I think Grudem has it right when he states (p. 1160-1161):

      “The [radical-transformation] position seems preferable here, for it is difficult to think that God would entirely annihilate his original creation, thereby seeming to give the devil the last word and scrapping the creation that was originally “very good” (Gen. 1:31). The passages above that speak of shaking and removing the earth and of the first earth passing away may simply refer to its existence in its present form, not its very existence itself, and even 2 Peter 3:10, which speaks of the elements dissolving and the earth and the work on it being burned up, may not be speaking of the earth as a planet but rather the surface things on the earth (that is, much of the ground and the things on the ground).”

      In Rev. 21:1-2 John is reporting the vision he was given of the consummation of the kingdom of God, the “heavenization” of this reality; we and creation are getting the ultimate makeover. The heavenly Jerusalem represents the eternal abode of the redeemed. As the holy city descends, heaven and earth are merged. God’s dwelling is with redeemed humanity (21:3) and the throne of God and of the Lamb is in the new Jerusalem (22:3). Thus, glorified believers will be both in heaven and on earth since the two shall then be one. In this existence, there will be no more death, mourning, crying, or pain.

      I pray this is of some value.

      In Christ,

      Ashby

    • Kevin L Moore 6:50 pm on March 16, 2012 Permalink | Reply

  • Richard Mansel 9:23 pm on March 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: catholocism, , st. patrick's day   

    St. Pats, Savannah and Departures 

    Savannah’s St. Patrick’s Day parade and ceremonies are starting this weekend. Savannah will have hundreds of thousands of visitors coming to town for the celebration. This year’s ceremony may be the largest St. Patrick’s Day parade in America. There will be almost a million people here. I will be 50 miles away and that will be close enough.

    I know little about St. Patrick’s Day. The entire Mardi Gras, Lent, Easter, etc. puzzle me.  I don’t understand the mishmash of images. Green plastic hats, drinking songs, drunkenness, vomiting and urination in the streets, public nudity, beads, ash on the forehead, green water, hangovers, arrests, fights, giving up things for one day and an early morning church service.

    What does any of this have to do with Scripture? NOTHING. It is the polar opposite of Scripture and is completely nonsensical. I want nothing to do with it. God calls us to righteousness, not debauchery in his name.

    “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God” (Romans 12:1-2)

    One of our young ladies announced that she was moving back home and that was sad news. When you work in a military congregation you say goodbye a lot. But it is never easy. We have lost a lot of folks in the past year and we hope that the Army will bring us some new ones soon.

    In our study tonight, we went from Revelation 19:9 to 20:5. We are enjoying the study immensely. It is sad that it is almost over.

    I want to thank all of you for reading our scribblings and for being a faithful visitor to the Fellowship Room.

     

     
    • Ron Thomas 4:42 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      In addition to this it sounds as if some brethren think it’s OK when a congregation of the Lord’s people observes a man made holiday (or day of significance) – under the banner of Romans 14.

      • J. Randal Matheny 7:21 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Was recently some discussion of this in an email group. Sad when brethren like to bring in human innovations.

        Enjoying your posts, Richard. Nice photo, too, even considering the event. Can we say parades are OK? :)

        • Richard Mansel 7:25 am on March 15, 2012 Permalink

          Thank you. Sure, parades are wonderful. The courthouse is beautiful. It has a gold dome and overlooks the river. Pretty scene there.

  • Richard Mansel 2:20 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: ,   

    Sunday Night Sermons 

    A preacher will preach a sermon on a Sunday night and a member of the congregation will say, “That would have been a good Sunday morning sermon.” Meaning, that it would have been good if non-Christians could have heard the sermon and its points.

    We ask the question: What is the difference between a Sunday morning and a Sunday night sermon? In most cases, the weaker Christians and non-Christians will not be back on Sunday night. Therefore, we are speaking to more experienced Christians who need a different kind of teaching.

    Someone has wisely said that the perfect sermon is one that “makes the saved feel saved and the lost feel lost.” Through that lens there wouldn’t be any difference between the morning and evening lesson. Yet, the audience must still be considered.

    If a man is at a congregation for several years, he must cover new topics to keep the lessons fresh. There are many kinds of sermons and an endless variety of available topics. Is it even possible that they will ALL will fit neatly within the morning and night dichotomy? Obviously, not.

    The congregation has needs that must be addressed, as well as those that fit the times and culture. When we deliver a sermon, there are thousands of other topics that we needed to deliver at that hour. But we can only deliver one at a time.

    A preacher will cringe when someone prays that the sermon will be exactly what the congregation needs at this moment. The preacher knows that is impossible. Each person there has their own individual needs and he cannot possibly address all of them at once.

    With all of this in mind, how do we decide what to preach with all of these factors in mind?

    Accordingly, I ask you:

    How do you decide what to preach?

    What makes a Sunday night sermon?

    Are there sermons that fit both morning and night classifications? How do you handle those?

    I look forward to your input. Thanks!

     
    • J. Randal Matheny 2:23 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Most churches in Brazil, among them, the ones I work with, have only one meeting on Sundays. Sorry that this isn’t a question that I could really address.

    • Richard Mansel 2:25 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I knew that Randal. Thanks anyway. God Bless.

    • Chad Dollahite 2:31 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      This is always tough for me, Richard. I’m not sure how to answer it, either. I try not to think about it too much, but I do find myself sometimes thinking, “No, that’s more of a ‘Sunday night’ sermon.” Usually, that thought comes when I’m working on something a bit more in-depth or something that is more geared toward strong, faithful members. We have a small group here, but almost all of our folks who are able return for Sunday evening, so it has almost become a moot point for me. Either way, great thoughts here…thanks!

    • Brad 7:09 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      My Sunday PM sermons are generally longer, more in-depth than the AM sermons. For example, twelve weeks covering the Minor Prophets, one PM for each book. In the AM, I am presently doing a series on prayer (based on questions that have been submitted by members). Some preachers I know of say “NT in the AM, OT in the PM.”

    • Chris Gallagher 8:45 am on March 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard,

      Great article. Regarding some of these matters, our congregation moved on Sunday night services to Sunday afternoon and changed the format to a Bible Study instead of a preaching service.

      Just some thoughts.

    • Weylan Deaver 3:06 pm on March 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I’m probably guilty as the next fellow of thinking in terms of a Sunday morning sermon being applicable to non-Christians, because they’re more likely to be there Sunday morning than Sunday night. At the risk of putting me at odds with myself, I also believe our regular worship services should not be directed to non-Christians. Worship is for the saints, to God’s glory. Non-saints are welcome to sit in and listen, but they are unqualified to worship. Non-saints are outsiders. We ought to do what we can to make them insiders, but not at the expense of our worship services. What we end up doing sometimes, I think, is shortchanging Christians by making sinners the focus. I’ve got some related thoughts on every sermon having to end with an invitation, but will save those for now…

      • J. Randal Matheny 5:24 pm on March 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Don’t tell anybody, but many churches here, recognizing that worship is for Christians, and depending more on personal and small-group efforts for evangelism than the church meetings, don’t offer an invitation after the sermon.

  • Richard Mansel 7:49 am on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , ,   

    Where Does Evil Come From? 

    In my article today I examine the darkness of evil as illustrated by the Nazis. I hope you will read it and share it with others. The tagline for my Facebook post is, “Evil enters our hearts when we leave the door open.”

    We see the evil in our world and we have to wonder where all of it comes from. No one is born evil (Ezekiel 18), so it comes from somewhere.

    I like the line from the Woody Allen film, “Hannah and her Sisters.” Max von Sydow plays a professor who was discussing a show where historians wondered why the Holocaust happened.

    Sydow’s character said, “The reason they can’t find the answer is because they are asking the wrong question. The question is not how did it happen but why doesn’t it happen more often?”

    We focus on the Jewish Holocaust as if it is the only one in history. However, genocide has existed since time began in one form of another. Ask the Serbs.

    Evil has an origin and it enters the hearts of men if we allow it. Read the chilling illustration I use today and you won’t likely forget it any time soon.

     
    • ELYSEE ALEXANDER 6:26 am on March 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Dear people of God,
      i m verry sad to say you the haitian church of christ in dominican republic will be close, next week
      because we can not pay the rent bulding worship,so we dept 15 mil pesos or 400 dollares ,i m very tired to beg any friendly hands support for this ministry. in this contry there are 1.8 thousand immigrant haitian so i have 3 years i still payed his bill but to day i have one years ago alose my job. i can not continuo to pay that. please help me to save his peoplein the darckness of vodoo. i still preach against the vodoo culture.
      your minster ELYSEE ALEXANDER,
      CHURCH OF CHRIST IN DOMINICAN REPUBLIC.
      OF HAITI.809 442 71 09

  • Richard Mansel 7:34 am on March 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , ,   

    Social Media and Fellowship 

    What role does social media have in Biblical fellowship? More specifically, what does it do to the lines between sound and unsound brethren? In the past, I have received Facebook friendship requests from false teachers who have dozens of sound brethren as “friends.”

    Should we be Facebook friends with false teachers? Do we need to examine the Scriptures on fellowship through the prism of social media? I look forward to the discussion.

     
    • Chris Gallagher 7:53 am on March 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard,

      What an interesting question, I will open the flood gates of discussion regarding this question. There are people on my Facebook and Twitter list with whom I strongly disagree. I go further and have joined groups with those in which I strongly disagree for a couple reasons:

      (1) I want to see how I can influence them for good through posting articles, links, material and even joining in discussions.

      (2) I want keep up with the current thoughts of those with whom I disagree. I learned growing up that examining the others side of an issue many times will aid me in strengthening my foundation for my beliefs.

      I appreciate the discussion and look forward to it.

      Thanks,

      Chris

    • John T. Polk II 10:58 am on March 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, thanks for bringing up the point for discussion. What Paul bound in 1 Corinthians 5 deals with (1) a local situation known to the local brethren; (2) involved purging out the “leaven” of observing our “Passover” (in the Lord’s Supper?); (3) and dealing with brethren who refused to repent when chastised; then surely we must deal with those whom we know to be in sin in such a way as to try to bring them to repentance.
      What then is impressed by Paul on Timothy (and us!) in dealing with false teachers is not designed to bring them to repentance as much as it is to preserve us from the error of their doctrine(s) in 1 Timothy 6:1-5. This tells us (1) the doctrine is set; (2) anyone teaching anything contrariwise is false; (3) we must remain “withdrawn” from them.
      That said, “social networking” blurs this distinction by allowing false teachers to continue to have influence over their acolytes. However, this electronic media works both ways! That’s why I have posted my debate charts with two false teachers on our website to keep the “marked” and refute their unscriptural doctrines that divide churches of Christ. One of these advocates the false doctrine that church-funded benevolence is for “saints only” (http://doverchurchofchrist.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RELIGIOUS-DISCUSSION-At-Northside-Church-of-Chri3.swf), the other advocates the false doctrine that brethren cannot eat meals in the church building (http://doverchurchofchrist.info/wpcontent/uploads/2011/10/PolkDonahueDebate.swf).
      This permits false teachers and their false doctrine(s) to be easily identified and refuted!
      Thus, when “social media” continually keeps the error of their doctrine before them (which is why I post these links on my “Facebook” page), others may be warned, also.
      God help us to maintain the Biblical lines clearly drawn by the Bible in our “postmodern” age! “Preach the word.”
      John T. Polk II

      • John T. Polk II 10:47 am on March 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Correction: the weblinks have been corrected and should work, now. Sorry for the inconvenience.

        Richard, thanks for bringing up the point for discussion. What Paul bound in 1 Corinthians 5 deals with (1) a local situation known to the local brethren; (2) involved purging out the “leaven” of observing our “Passover” (in the Lord’s Supper?); (3) and dealing with brethren who refused to repent when chastised; then surely we must deal with those whom we know to be in sin in such a way as to try to bring them to repentance.
        What then is impressed by Paul on Timothy (and us!) in dealing with false teachers is not designed to bring them to repentance as much as it is to preserve us from the error of their doctrine(s) in 1 Timothy 6:1-5. This tells us (1) the doctrine is set; (2) anyone teaching anything contrariwise is false; (3) we must remain “withdrawn” from them.
        That said, “social networking” blurs this distinction by allowing false teachers to continue to have influence over their acolytes. However, this electronic media works both ways! That’s why I have posted my debate charts with two false teachers on our website to keep the “marked” and refute their unscriptural doctrines that divide churches of Christ. One of these advocates the false doctrine that church-funded benevolence is for “saints only” (http://doverchurchofchrist.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/RELIGIOUS-DISCUSSION-At-Northside-Church-of-Chri3.swf), the other advocates the false doctrine that brethren cannot eat meals in the church building (http://doverchurchofchrist.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/PolkDonahueDebate.swf).
        This permits false teachers and their false doctrine(s) to be easily identified and refuted!
        Thus, when “social media” continually keeps the error of their doctrine before them (which is why I post these links on my “Facebook” page), others may be warned, also.
        God help us to maintain the Biblical lines clearly drawn by the Bible in our “postmodern” age! “Preach the word.”
        John T. Polk II

    • Stevelucas 5:41 pm on March 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Chris,

      You are so spot on with your thoughts. If we do not engage those with whom we disagree, then before long we simply love those who love us and never know what are the concerns or issues of those who have yet to put on Christ. And oh yes, occasionally we learn a more perfect understanding of God’s Word which otherwise may never have been discovered.

    • Eugene Adkins 6:04 pm on March 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Great questions, Richard.

      This is something that I’ve thought about before. I believe that one can be a “friend” to someone without “fellowshipping” with them. For the most part I enjoy talking to others about things even when I do not agree with them biblically or socially. I think that’s all a part of our dialouge process…at least if we wish to have one.

      Jesus definitely at with people that He did not agree with. While I know that a distinction can be made between “friending” someone and having a conversation with them, I also know that a person will never hear what you have to say if we always keep them at arms-length.

      While there are no doubt exceptions to what I’ve said, I believe if a person can show themsleves friendly in the “real” world then they should be able to do the same in the “digital” one.

      Just for clarification sake, I don’t have a face book account :)

    • J. Randal Matheny 5:05 am on March 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I try to avoid the pushers, those who actively promote progressive doctrine. I don’t want to give them access to people. Others, I may befriend in hopes of influencing.

      • Eugene Adkins 6:58 am on March 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        I believe that would be one of my “exceptions” that I referred to, but I often take the chance to use it for a discussion without the use of the “like” button on the wordpress side of things.

  • Richard Mansel 5:16 am on February 21, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: immodesty, , ,   

    Revealing a Secret 

    Today, I violate the code and open the door on something Christian men have tried to keep quiet. Why? Because women need to know what Christian men REALLY think about modesty and immodesty in women so they can have more empathy and compassion. I hope you will read the article and share your thoughts on what I consider an important issue.

     
    • Ron Thomas 5:22 am on February 21, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I would be interested in reading, Richard, but I got a warning sign from google (malware). Consequently, I did not follow the link.

  • Richard Mansel 10:22 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    The Implanted Word 

    I am preaching through James and this Sunday morning, my text will be James 1:21, “Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness, and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.”

    What a great passage! What thoughts do you have on the implanted word and this passage in general? Thanks! I look forward to reading your great comments.

     
    • Patrick Medlock 11:24 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, James’ words harmonize well with other areas of the NT regarding the word as seed analogy. The seed is living Heb 4:12-13, John 6:63; enduring I Pet 1:23 as well as soul-saving your text, Rom 10:13-15, & I Thessalonians 2:13. The successful engrafting of the word shows itself in exercise of our will to follow the spirit’s lead Gal 5:22-23, as opposed to allowing the flesh by default to quench the Spirit which permits an unsaved state of being to prevail Gal 5:19-21. Just a couple of third.

    • Eugene Adkins 7:58 pm on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Hello Richard,

      I always think of the parable of the sower in Luke 8. I also think of the emphasis that James placed in how we are to receive the word – with meekness. This is really powerful in light of the previous two verses that talks about our attiude toward the correction and admonition of God’s word. Most of the time we use the verses in relation to our relationship with others when the context is actually about our relationship with God’s word. The parable of the sower doesn’t say much about anger choking out the fruitfulness of God’s word but James sure does. Preach on!

  • Richard Mansel 10:14 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Preachers are not weapons… 

    A woman calls me and basically says, “My husband is doing something I don’t like. Can you preach a sermon about it?” I’m thinking, “Um, no.” Have you ever had people try to get you to solve their issues with other people in the pulpit? It is disgusting, isn’t it?

     
    • Ron Thomas 10:21 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      No, I have not been so “fortunate.” I am glad.

    • Weylan Deaver 10:42 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Several years ago, I did have a young wife request a sermon from 1 Peter 3:7 (her husband is also a Christian–both great people). I accommodated the request, but did not feel “used” as a weapon. I think she was sincerely trying, submissively, to help mold her husband’s character for the better. It sounds a little different than the case you mentioned.

  • Richard Mansel 8:19 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: choir, ,   

    Are We Confused? 

    If we adamantly preach from the pulpit that the Lord’s Church should not have a choir, then why do we joke from the pulpit about preaching to the choir? Do we just like to confuse people?

     
    • Ron Thomas 8:21 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Some words can be used in different contexts to convey a significant point. I think this is one of those words. The word “choir” to me is not a troublesome word. As you would say (presumably), I do the same, the congregation is the Lord’s choir.

      • Richard Mansel 8:28 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        True. However, are we certain that everyone in attendance understands the nuance? No.

        • Ron Thomas 8:36 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink

          This is true, and it is fair to ask as you have. That also applies, however, to the many other words that are used by people in a local or larger setting.

        • J. Randal Matheny 9:12 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink

          I’d think people understand, since it’s a figure of speech quite well known.

  • Richard Mansel 10:51 am on February 10, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , drunkenness,   

    Drunk and Clueless 

    Someone shared this on Facebook and I wanted to share it with you. Alcohol and bad parenting skills converged in this home.

    “Who has woe? Who has sorrow? Who has contentions? Who has complaints? Who has wounds without cause? Who has redness of eyes? Those who linger long at the wine, Those who go in search of mixed wine. Do not look on the wine when it is red, When it sparkles in the cup, When it swirls around smoothly; At the last it bites like a serpent, And stings like a viper. Your eyes will see strange things, And your heart will utter perverse things. Yes, you will be like one who lies down in the midst of the sea, Or like one who lies at the top of the mast, saying: “They have struck me, but I was not hurt; They have beaten me, but I did not feel it. When shall I awake, that I may seek another drink?” (Proverbs 23:29-35).

     
  • Richard Mansel 4:29 pm on February 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Nudge, Nudge, Smirk, Smirk 

    Randal asked if we have a sense of humor. I’ve been told I have a good one. I love humor and can’t resist it. I have funny thoughts running through my head most of the time.

    I have what is called a dry sense of humor that can be described as observational. I can usually rift off of the things I see around me quite easily. I also love witty repartee. It helps to read a lot to have more ammunition.

    I am often thinking of funny replies to what people post on Facebook. But I try to resist. :)

    I love puns and smart humor. I see humor in almost everything. I can sit at WalMart or watch TV and think of almost non-stop jokes. I always wanted to be on Mystery Science Theater 3000.

    Crude humor doesn’t have a place with me. In fact, my creed is, “Humor should amuse, not abuse.” I don’t believe in cruel humor because the Golden Rule dictates my life. If I don’t like it, I’m not doing it to others. Hence, I don’t taunt or cruelly mock others because I don’t want them turned on me.

    Getting laughs with crude talk is too easy and therefore pointless. It’s like one comedian said about performing his comedy routine to a drunk audience. “If you make them laugh it doesn’t count. They’re drunk. They’re always laughing.”

    It is disturbing that true humor is almost dead in popular culture. All they have left is the crude, easy joke. I think that either says something about the intelligence of the entertainment business or the public. Or, both.

    I am dismayed that so many people fail to see humor in Scripture. In fact, some people see it as offensive to even suggest that there is humor in God’s Word. It is somehow sacrilegious.

    How can you read Elijah mocking the prophets of Baal (1 Kings 18), Balaam and the donkey (Numbers 22) and Micaiah and Ahab (1 Kings 22) and a host of others without laughing?

    Job was so frustrated with the rants of his ignorant friends that he said, “No doubt you are the people, and wisdom will die with you!” (Job 12:2). I find this funny but have pointed that out to congregations and they just stare at me. Maybe that says something about my humor.

    Besides women like a man with a sense of humor. Or, so I’ve been told.

     
    • Mike Riley 6:29 pm on February 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, Oh, to have the humor of the dog in the above picture you posted! HA! HA! (:

  • Richard Mansel 9:49 am on February 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , ,   

    Corrupting Other People’s Children 

    I want to talk about a strange brand of hypocrites who hate children. Well, that’s not exactly true. They only hate other people’s children. Let me explain.

    Trevor and Jasmine are married and they have two children, a nine year-old boy and a seven year-old girl. They love their children more than life itself and they protect their children in every way that they deem important. They do not allow their children to watch certain channels on TV and they are very careful about what kind of music their children hear. Most of us would say they are good parents.

    Now, let’s consider the following scenario. Trevor and Jasmine are with two other like-minded families in a banquet room at a local restaurant for a birthday party. They are all dressed in their best clothes. Half-way through their party, a man they do not know walks into the room containing all the children and parents. The stranger starts loudly cursing and talking about his sexual prowess.

    What do Trevor and Jasmine do? Trevor goes over and pushes the man out of the room, screaming at him to shut his filthy mouth. Meanwhile, Jasmine has covered their children’s ears. Naturally, they love their children and don’t want them corrupted.

    Trevor and Jasmine take their children home and leave them with a baby sitter. Trevor and Jasmine change their clothes and put on jeans and t-shirts. Trevor’s t-shirt brags about his sexual prowess and Jasmine’s is covered with profanity. Happily, they go to Walmart to shop among other nine year-old boys and seven year-old girls who can read their shirts and be corrupted by them.

    Hence, hypocrites. Pure and simple. No one better corrupt their children but they can damage other kids.

    In all honesty, what is the difference in walking into a room of children and saying obscene things and wearing obscene t-shirts in a store where children are present? Nothing. Both exhibit a hatred of children, no matter what rationalization we use.

     
  • Richard Mansel 4:51 pm on February 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Completely Missing the Point [Updated] 

    Teaching Revelation is fascinating. Reading the bizarre comments from commentaries is both mystifying and amusing. I saw one today that I wanted to share. I shall withhold the name of the commentary to protect the guilty. :)

    Revelation 17:6 says: I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. And when I saw her, I marveled with great amazement.

    The commentator came to this grisly, powerful verse and spent his entire entry on the dangers of drinking alcohol. I kid you not.

    Here we have faithful Christians, godly people walking in the light, being massacred for being in Christ and all he can muster is don’t drink alcohol? This verse should provoke tears rather than a temperance lesson.

    It is actually offensive to think that someone could ignore the sacrifice of the martyrs while riding a hobby horse. Have some respect for those who died for their faith!

    Sometimes you don’t understand what runs through people’s minds.

     
  • Richard Mansel 11:24 am on January 26, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , ,   

    Why Won’t God Help Us? 

    Actually the answers to our problems do not exist within mankind. Only in Christ can we find what we seek as human beings. Sin will continue to be here and everything that comes with it (1 Peter 5:8). We cannot stop it no matter what we do. All we can do is give ourselves to the Lord, so He can help us deal with them (Romans 5:6-11; Acts 2:37-38; Acts 22:16).

     
  • Richard Mansel 11:01 am on January 26, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , resist,   

    Resisting Temptation 

    “A silly idea is current that good people do not know what temptation means. This is an obvious lie. Only those who try to resist temptation know how strong it is… A man who gives in to temptation after five minutes simply does not know what it would have been like an hour later. That is why bad people, in one sense, know very little about badness. They have lived a sheltered life by always giving in.” [C.S. Lewis].

     
    • Ron Thomas 11:04 am on January 26, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      An excellent post!

      • Weylan Deaver 1:53 pm on January 26, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Yes, Lewis was a thought-provoker. I don’t remember if it was he, or another writer, who made the point that Jesus knew temptation’s power even more than any of us, since, by resisting till he conquered, he always experienced temptation’s full force.

  • Richard Mansel 8:40 am on January 19, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , challenging, ,   

    Clever Way to Handle Revelation 

    I am currently teaching Revelation on Wednesday night. We finished our last lesson midway through chapter 16. The study is challenging but empowering as we see the clear gospel and the power of God.

    One of our men found an old Adult Bible Quarterly from 2000 on Revelation. We recently spent a good bit of time working through chapter 13 because it is such a difficult chapter. He was curious to see what this book said about that chapter.

    He soon discovered that this Quarterly had a clever way of handling Revelation — you skip all the hard chapters. Chapter 13 wasn’t even covered. They also skipped chapters 16-18 and 20-21. hmmm

    This may make it easier on the writer but it doesn’t do anything for the teacher or the student. While these chapters are difficult to understand, they are also very powerful testaments to the glory and plan of God.

    Ignoring them is an insult to the Holy Spirit’s efforts to give them to us and leaves us without the full message of judgment. How can that benefit anyone?

     
    • Will 9:08 am on January 19, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      hUM…I’m doing a Monday Night Bible study with those interested in studying the book of Revelation, and I’m using the material gathered by James M. Booth, from the web site http://www.padfield.com. I find James material refreshing and rather easy to teach and understand.

    • Eugene Adkins 9:59 pm on January 19, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I used the pdf class outline for Revelation from Padfield and it was very useful along with a commentary by Donald R. Taylor called “The Apocalypse: A Revelation of Jesus Christ”. I found them both to be useful when I taught through the book of Revelation in our teenage class (by request). I don’t think they thought it was as “exciting” as they “thought” is was going to be. No doubt though, there are some wonderful lessons to learn from Revelation about the work/will of God that go along with the “small” glimpses of heavenly glory that can comfort us greatly when understood properly.

      Good article Richard.

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,603 other followers