Tagged: baptism Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • TFRStaff 4:18 am on May 19, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    Don’t put off Christ 

    We’ve baptized people in hospital tubs. We’ve covered medical ports with plastic and tape, and sought permission from medical professionals to baptize patients. We’ve brought frail ones in wheelchairs, and carried some on folding chairs. We once used a hydraulic lift in the nursing home.

    Isn’t that a bit extreme?

    Not to someone who believes what the Bible teaches.

    Baptism is a command of the Lord Jesus Christ, and a pre-requisite to salvation. “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved” (Mark 16:16; read also, Acts 2:38; 8:35-40; Rom. 6:3,4; Gal. 3:26-29; Col. 2:12; 1 Pet. 3:21-22).

    There is not a single case of conversion in which baptism is not seen as an urgent matter. Why would we act any differently?

    Rick Kelley, Prestonsburg KY congregational bulletin

     
  • Michael Summers 8:30 pm on May 16, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , , , Gordon's Calvary   

    Leaving the Tomb…It’s Time to Go 

    An empty tomb welcomes tourists and pilgrims in Jerusalem. Located at the foot of a rocky knoll that looks so much like a “place of the skull,” if it is not the place of Jesus’ crucifixion, burial and subsequent resurrection, it certainly evokes thoughts of those events. While it inspires interest in the events around the death of Jesus, it does not preach the word by itself (One stills needs a preacher, or at least a friend, for that). It does not feed the poor or heal the hurting. It does not visit those in prison or give water to the thirsty. This place does not baptize or sing or pray. Only people who believe that God loved the world enough to send his Son to die for us can perform those acts. Sadly, sometimes we do as much as the empty tomb. We may do less, since the tomb does teach by symbolizing the place where world-changing events occurred. After the resurrection, Jesus instructed followers to “Go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age” (Matthew 28:18-20 NIV84). We need to leave the empty tomb and direct a spiritually starving world to the Risen Messiah, Jesus. It is time to obey; it is time to go.

     
  • John T. Polk II 4:02 am on April 30, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , , , , , , , , , , , snares, traps, , ,   

    Psalm 141 Shut My Mouth 

    This Psalm of David could have originated at one of several times in his life, so the historical background is not definitely set, but it clearly is similar to other of his Psalms.

    Verses 1-2 appeal to God to hear this prayer;

    Verses 3-4 concerned with one’s words;

    Verse 5-concerned with one’s thoughts;

    Verses 5c-7 concerned with one’s bones;

    Verses 8-10 concerned with one’s eyes.

    Verses 1-2: To “cry out” expresses immediate need(s). For prayer to be “set before” God “as incense” (Exodus 30:1-10), helps us see that when Moses’ Law was taken out of the way by the cross of Jesus Christ (Colossians 2:14-16), Christian prayers ascend before God instead of incense (Revelation 5:8).

    Verses 3-4: It is not asking for God to choose our words, but knowing we have called attention to the problem we have with wrong words should keep us more keenly aware (Matthew 12:34-37). “If anyone among you thinks he is religious, and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his own heart, this one’s religion is useless” (James 1:26). “For we all stumble in many things. If anyone does not stumble in word, he is a perfect man, able also to bridle the whole body” (James 3:2). In fact, David realizes, to avoid sin, we must not lean toward “any evil thing,” “practice wicked works,” associate with evil workers, or commonly associate with sinners. This progression into sin is similar to Psalm 1.

    Verse 5: If we find ourselves heading in the wrong direction, the rebuke of a righteous person should bring us back to spirituality. “Open rebuke is better Than love carefully concealed” (Proverbs 27:5). “Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness, considering yourself lest you also be tempted” (Galatians 6:1).

    Verses 5c-7: Our prayers should be not only for us to be strong, but for the wicked to be blunted and weakened. “Judges” are their leaders, but “sweet” “words” of a prayerful appeal to God can see them taken down. Their damage, however, may break up God’s people as if physical bodies had been plowed under!

    Verses 8-10: “Eyes,” rightly focused on the goal, must not be misled. Once a person has been buried in the water of baptism into Jesus’ death (and not before), and raised to a new life with Him (Romans 6:3-5), they are saved (1 Peter 3:21). “If then you were raised with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ is, sitting at the right hand of God. Set your mind on things above, not on things on the earth. For you died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God” (Colossians 3:1-3). By obeying God and following Jesus Christ, God will “keep” (avoid sin, 1 John 3:6) a Christian from the “snares” and “traps” the wicked continually provide. It was the partial obedience of the Israelites in cleaning the wicked nations out of the Promised Land, that God warned they would become “snares and traps to you, and scourges on your sides and thorns in your eyes, until you perish from this good land which the LORD your God has given you” (Joshua 23:13). “Thorns and snares are in the way of the perverse; He who guards his soul will be far from them” (Proverbs 22:5). David did not pray out of vengeance or hatred, but simply that God let “the wicked fall into their own nets” and he be allowed to “escape.” When the wicked are treated with their own wickedness is not only just, it is fair for the righteous. “Whoever digs a pit will fall into it, And he who rolls a stone will have it roll back on him” (Proverbs 26:27). A rolling stone may not gather moss, but often it punishes the ones who started it rolling!

    All Scriptures and comments are based upon the New King James Version, unless otherwise noted.

     
  • John T. Polk II 4:07 am on April 17, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , baptism, , , , , David's throne, , , , , priests, , Zion   

    Psalm 132 The Cure for Restlessness 

    There is uncertainty regarding the author, time, or circumstances of these Psalms, but it is apparent Psalms 120-134 work together, and are called the “Songs of Degrees,” and sometimes “Songs of Ascension.” This Psalm is a prayer for David, possibly spoken by his son, Solomon.

    Verse 1-5 open a prayer about David’s concern for God’s temple;

    Verses 6-9 show David’s concern for God’s ark;

    Verses 10-18 give God’s concern for David’s legacy.

    Verses 1-5: The prayer is for God to “remember David,” and all he went through to be faithful to God.

    (Verses 2-4) David “swore to the LORD” to remain restless until a place for worshipping God was found. He would not: find comfort in his own house, or his own bed, or sleep soundly, or relax in “slumber,” unless God’s House was in its place (2 Samuel 7:1-3). (Verse 5) David moved the ark into God’s place (1 Chronicles 15:1-3; 16:1), but was not permitted to build the Temple (1 Kings 8:18-19).

    Verses 6-9: (Verse 6) “Ephratha” was a region which included Bethlehem (Micah 5:2), and may have also included Kirjath Jearim (“city of the woods”), where the ark stayed 20 years (1 Samuel 7:1-3), then moved into Jerusalem (2 Samuel 6:11-19). (Verse 7) Once the place of worship is known, the exhortation is “Let us go” first “into His tabernacle” (or temporary tent, then Solomon built a Temple, then Jesus Christ build the church of Christ, Matthew 16:18; Acts 2:38, 41, 47; 2 Corinthians 6:16), secondly, “worship at His footstool.” Proper worship may only be done in the tabernacle, or today, the church of Christ. (Verse 8) God will respond to proper worship from the proper place, as His “ark” represents His presence. Jesus Christ is the “propitiation” (mercy seat, or cover of the ark) “for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world” (1 John 2:2). (Verse 9) God’s priests were to be properly clothed to perform their duties (Exodus 40:1-16). Today, God’s priests are Christians who were baptized into Jesus Christ to put Him on as their proper garment (1 Peter 2:4-5; Galatians 3:26-29).

    Verses 10-18: (Verse 10) God’s promise for his son to build God’s house seemed to point to Solomon (2 Samuel 7:4-14), but David’s throne is now occupied by Jesus Christ (Acts 2:29-32), and Jesus built God’s spiritual house, the church of Christ (Hebrews 3:1-6). (Verses 11-12) Faithfulness was the requirement for David’s “sons” to sit on his throne, which failed with Solomon (1 Kings 11:9-40). (Verses 13-18) Since “the LORD has chosen Zion” for His “resting place forever,” Jerusalem lasted until Jesus Christ came, lived and died on the cross (Romans 9:30-33). After God destroyed Jerusalem in A.D.70, it had been made clear that it is spiritual Israel and spiritual Zion who represent God’s people today (Hebrews 12:22-25; Galatians 6:14-16). Christians are provided blessings (1 Peter 4:12-14), the bread of life (1 Corinthians 11:23-26), priestly garment of Jesus Christ (Galatians 3:27), joyful singing because of the Word of Christ (Colossians 3:16).

    Thought: The prayer for David has been answered, for his obedience certainly paved the way for Jesus Christ to sit on David’s throne forever.

     All Scriptures and comments are based upon the New King James Version, unless otherwise noted.

     
  • Eugene Adkins 7:18 am on February 27, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , , , , , Grace only, , Obeying the gospel,   

    It’s “Funny” Which “Works” Earn Salvation and Which “Works” Do Not In The Eyes of Some People 

    “Baptism isn’t needed for salvation because baptism is a work and if salvation is by works then it’s not by grace!”

    Ah, the old broken record that continuously repeats itself upon the same grove. It’s amazing what some people consider to be “works that earn salvation” while considering other “works that aren’t works” essential when it comes to being saved.

    For example:

    Grace. We all need it. It’s been shown to all, but all don’t want to see it. And all aren’t going to see it in the judgment. It’s the whole “blind before seeing” thing we sing about. Now, if a person wants to receive the gift of God’s grace they’re going to have to do something because if not, then everyone would be going to Heaven and there would be no need for a place called Hell. Simple enough to follow right? But no one wants to call this process “works” because they’re afraid it’ll stain the whole “saved by grace alone” theory. So which is it? Does a person have to respond to God’s grace to be saved or not? Of course they do! An individual person must willingly make a decision to follow God and accept the gift He offers through their own volition through Jesus, not be forced to accept it through something called irresistible grace. Responding to God’s grace is something we must do – responding is a work, an action needed on our behalf per say – but it no way earns the offer of God’s gift.

    Faith. We all need it…to be saved anyways. But everyone doesn’t have it because everyone doesn’t want it. Now some teach that we’re saved by grace alone through faith alone (amazing how you can two “alones” isn’t it???) and that anything else done is a work that makes a person earn his or her salvation. No works people proclaim – only grace and only faith, for works have no place in salvation. But here’s the secret that many people who proclaim this don’t want to hear – having, showing and responding to God’s gift of grace through Jesus is a work! It’s a work we’re responsible for, and it’s a work Jesus discussed with people in the past: “Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?” Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.” (John 6:28-29). Jesus didn’t say anything about, “Oh, there’s nothing you must do, just simply believe and leave it up to grace because anything else would cause you to earn what I’m going to do.” No, Jesus said we have a responsibility to do something. We have a responsibility to follow God’s will and God’s commands and doing these things in no way places God in our debt and it no way earns the salvation that God offers.

    Repentance. Repent is a command. Repentance is action. Salvation will not be enjoyed without repentance. A change of mind seen through a change of actions. Both of which is something we’re responsible for doing. Repentance is not a work done on us or to us. Not one verse in the Bible teaches this, but many verses teach that repentance is something we must do – a work, an action – or we’ll perish in Hell. “…but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.” (Luke 13:3) Jesus didn’t say, “Well, I would tell you to repent but that would mean you’re earning your salvation, so….” That’s not what Jesus said. Jesus said we, as individuals, are responsible for following God’s command and repenting of our sins if we want to find the forgiveness of our sins. This in no way places God in our debt because it’s something that God requires us to do. He’s not offering wages if we repent – He’s offering His gift of salvation. But we must want to be saved – we must repent.

    Confessing Jesus. We should have a willingness to do so, but everyone doesn’t. Confessing Jesus is a must. It’s something we must do. It’s vital to salvation! It’s an action. It’s a work that we’re required to do. No, you say? I say…rather, I ask, have you not read the Bible? The Bible says, “that if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” (Romans 10:9-10). I know many, many people who claim that a person is saved by grace alone through faith alone but for some reason they still teach that a person must confess Jesus to be saved…what happened to that just believing thing? Belief and confession are two separate things! Read Romans 10 again. The very verses used to teach grace alone by faith alone contradicts them both by saying confession on our behalf is essential! Confession is an action required by God on our behalf. It is something – a work – we must do. Confessing Jesus does not earn a person’s salvation because it submits to the offer of salvation made by God through Jesus.

    Baptism. “Now preacher, it’s true that we must have faith, that we must repent and that we must confess Jesus, but even though those are something we must do they’re not “works” that earn our salvation, but that baptism stuff…that’s where the line is drawn!” I hear it all the time. Who drew that line??? I’ll tell you where the line is – there’s a line between listening to God’s will and rejecting God’s will. There’s a line between being saved and being lost. There’s a line between the works of men and women and the work of God. It’s a line drawn in the waters of baptism where the blood of Jesus washes our sins away (Acts 22:16, Revelation 1:5). It’s a line where the old person is buried in the water and the new, born again person is raised out of the water (2 Corinthians 5:17, Romans 6:1-4). And until a person submits to God’s work that takes place during baptism then a person is defiantly relying upon their own works, their own system of salvation through faith, repentance and confession that balks at baptism of God instead of walking down in the water submissively and allowing God to remove sin from their heart and replace it with the Spirit of God. A person doesn’t have the Son without being baptized, and if they don’t have the Son they don’t have the Father or His promise of salvation (Galatians 3:26-29). Submitting to God’s will in baptism doesn’t earn a man or woman his or her salvation. Baptism for the remission of sins came from God. He designed it. He ordered it. He requires it. And to say that a person is saved before baptism on this side of the cross of Jesus because baptism is a “work of man” is to say that one does not have to do the works of God to be saved.

    There are works that earn, works that spurn and works that yearn, and no one can show how responding to God’s will and God’s commands to be saved causes God to be indebted to us; that’s because it doesn’t. Following the will of God never has, and never will place God in a person’s debt when it comes to being saved, but if we want to get rid of the debt of sin we need to respond to the offer of His gift. A gift that’s found through God’s will/grace, our faith, our willingness to repent, our willingness to confess Jesus, our willingness to be baptized and our willingness to live faithfully allowing the blood of Jesus to do what it was meant to do when it comes to the will of God – and that’s get us to Heaven.

    It’s “funny” how faith, repentance and confession (all things – works – we must do) doesn’t earn a person his or her salvation but baptism does??? Yeah, if you believe that you might want to stop working on that and start submitting to God’s will.

     
    • Morris 10:14 am on February 27, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      Looks like it may be the works they want to do that works.

      Another amazing thing is this: If you ask the works people what you can do to go to Heaven, they will give you a list – ask them if I do all these things can I know I am going to Heaven – and almost without fail they don’t know.

      Since Jesus paid it all we can rest assured that a person can go to Heaven by trusting His death and resurrection for their sins.

  • Eugene Adkins 6:51 am on February 25, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , Damascus, , , , , Sinner's Prayer,   

    Damascus or Straight – They Don’t Lead To The Same Place 

    There are many in the religious world who claim that Paul was “saved” on the road to Damascus. Then using the ole’ Damascus road example they teach that all a person has to do to be saved is believe in Jesus and say a prayer and then their salvation is secure. Anybody can stake a claim, but the deed of truth can be something entirely different.

    Now, it’s definitely true that Paul met his Savior on the ole’ Damascus road but it’s not true that he received the gift of salvation from Jesus at that point. Paul was told by the Lord to keep traveling on the ole’ Damascus road and head on into the city and wait for instructions…he hadn’t arrived at his destination yet!

    The man who couldn’t wait to get to Damascus was now going to have simmer there for a time while waiting for Ananias’ instructions, and Ananias wasn’t out there on the ole’ Damascus road – he would later meet a multi-day blind, fasting and praying Paul in a house on the street called Straight. It was there, on the street called Straight, that Paul would receive the heavenly instructions on what to do to begin his walk in Jesus as a Christian (Acts 9:18, 22:16).

    If we want to reach our destination when it comes to the salvation found in Jesus we need to look to the street called Straight and not the broad way of the Damascus road. The street called Straight may be a little more difficult to find, but the scriptures make it clear that it’ll be worth the effort.

    Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.” (Matthew 7:13-14)

     
    • Morris 7:05 am on February 25, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      Works for salvation is completely foreign to salvation in the Age of Grace.

      In your opinion, how is a person saved today?

      • Eugene Adkins 8:23 pm on February 25, 2013 Permalink | Reply

        How is a person saved today? By God’s grace my friend. The same way any person is going to make it to Heaven whether they lived under the Old Testament or New Testament.

        But what you’re going to have to prove is that one is not saved by God’s grace when they do what God asks/tells them to do. For that is exactly where baptism for the remission of sins comes from – from God.

        Until you’re able to show that following/submitting to God’s commands earns any person his or her salvation then your accusation is sorely lacking any biblical truth.

    • Clarence Honnold 9:55 am on February 25, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      Yet, when Paul referred to his conversion, he always pointed to “the ole’ Damascus road,” never to his baptism. I once attended a baptism where the one baptizing said that the lady’s sins who was being baptized were now at the bottom of the swimming poor they had used as a baptistry. I’m afraid I’d didn’t appreciate the gravity of the time. My immediate thought was, “Boy, I don’ want to go into THAT water!”

      • Eugene Adkins 8:16 pm on February 25, 2013 Permalink | Reply

        Never to his baptism my friend? Baptism is mentioned 2 of the 3 times that the account is given. The point about the Damascus road is that it only began what was finished on the street called Straight as far as Paul’s salvation is concerned.

        The reason it starts on the road to Damascus is because Paul used that encounter to tell others why he was doing what he was doing when it came to preaching Jesus. So I don’t really see what baptism never being the beginning of his conversion account has to do with the post.

        At the end of the day, people today don’t need to stop on the road into town when it comes to becoming a Christian, they need to keep traveling and visit the street in town if they want to learn about the way that Paul received the remission of his sins…because it was not on the ole’ Damascus road as the rest of the scriptures plainly show.

    • Morris 4:26 am on February 26, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      I agree with you that a person is saved by Grace and that Grace is given because of what Christ accomplished through His death and resurrection, not because we walk a straight road. When we add works to Grace it is no longer Grace.

      Romans 11:6 And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace: otherwise work is no more work.

      It is not about us, it is about Christ and His sacrifice on Calvary and His glorious resurrection. If it was about us then we would have reason to boast.

      Ephesians 2:8-9
      8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
      9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

      • Eugene Adkins 6:14 am on February 26, 2013 Permalink | Reply

        So we agree that a person is saved by grace, that’s good. But are you saying salvation is by grace alone? If, and again I say if you are saying that it is by grace alone please read Ephesians 2:8 again. Salvation is not by grace alone. Grace is the only thing that’s opened the door to salvation, but grace won’t force a person to come into Christ to receive His gift – or else it wouldn’t be a gift.

        Grace is unmerited favor, but my friend don’t confuse unmerited favor with unconditional salvation. There is nothing a person could ever do to put God in his or her debt when it comes to earning salvation; there is nothing a person could ever do to have earned the right of God sending Jesus to die for our sins. But to say that walking the straight road has nothing to do with an individual’s salvation is to completely ignore what Jesus Himself said in Matthew 7:14: “For narrow is the door and hard the road to life, and only a small number make discovery of it.” (BBE) Right there Jesus simply, but clearly said that if a person isn’t interested in salvation they’re not going to find salvation despite the fact that salvation is by God’s grace. To ignore this is to walk the wide and open way of “salvation” that in reality leads to destruction (Matthew 7:13).

        Again, according to what you have said, what you must do is show how listening to God’s command about baptism (Mark 16:16; Acts 2:38, 41, 8:36-38, 10:47, 18:8, 19:3-5, 22:16; Romans 6:1-4; Galatians 3:26-27; Ephesians 5:26; Colossians 2:11-12; Titus 3:5; 1 Peter 3:21) makes a person put God in his or her debt. All of those cited verses show that baptism is a command and work of God to be followed according to His will; not a work designed by man that earns a person’s salvation. So if a person submits to God’s will in baptism how can one be told that they are earning his or her salvation by works?

        Please do not confuse “works” that place God in our debt with “works” that respond to His grace through faith. These two are not the same, hence a person needs to do what the Bible says they need to do when it comes to Paul’s example: Don’t stop on the road to Damascus and expect to be saved by simply “believing in your heart” or “saying a prayer” as some teach – do as the Bible says and go on into town and follow Paul’s example and be baptized to have your sins washed away, calling on the name of the Lord (Acts 22:16, Revelation 1:5).

    • Morris 6:01 pm on February 26, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      Ephesians 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
      Yes, I believe it is by grace alone through faith alone.
      Not sure why you think that someone is forced as that is not the case and I have stated no such.
      As Jesus said the road to life was a hard road, but He took the hard out when He took our place on Calvary. Hard to be saved, no, hard to live as we should as Christians, yes.
      Today and let me stress the word today, baptism has nothing to do with our salvation.
      The Gospel by which we are saved today is stated in

      1 Corinthians 15:1-4

      1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand;
      2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.
      3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;
      4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

      V1 Paul is about to state the Gospel which had been received
      V2 It is the Gospel by which we are saved – the vain belief being anything other than what he is about to state
      V3 The first part of the saving Gospel: Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures
      V4 The second and third part of the Gospel – Christ was buried, and Christ rose again the third day
      No baptism – So if baptism is not required for salvation – why do we do it? As a testimony to what has happened to us – we are not baptized to be saved – we are baptized because we are saved for a testimony

      Paul said it himself:

      1 Corinthians 1:17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

      We are saved by believing that Christ died for our sins, and rose again the third day – this is a gift of God and cannot be earned.

      Don’t confuse the message to Israel with the message to the Church – you can’t cash a check written to someone else without getting into trouble.

      • Eugene Adkins 6:48 pm on February 26, 2013 Permalink | Reply

        Hello again, Morris,

        I’ll be fairly quick with this.

        1) You added the words alone to Ephesians 2:8. It’s not there in the Greek or in the English or in the Spanish or in the Latin or in the Russian, etc. Don’t know what translation you’re using to get that, but I’ve never seen one that says what you’re saying.

        2) A person obeys the gospel and receives the gift of God’s salvation when they die to sin through repentance (there’s the crucifixion), when they are buried in water (there’s the burial in the tomb), and when they are raised out of the water to walk in the newness of life that they did not have before (there’s the resurrection). All of this is very plainly taught in Romans 6 and it matches 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 perfectly so your point isn’t really a point at all.

        3) You’re trying to say that salvation is conditionally unconditional because you sorely misunderstand what it means for a person to believe. The saving faith the scriptures speak of is not faith alone. Faith alone never has and it never will save a person. It won’t work for the demons and it won’t work for people (James 2:17-24). No where does the Bible say that a person is saved faith alone. If you believe it does then provide the scripture verbatim and not what you think it says.

        4) Paul preached the gospel first because unless a person believes it’s a little silly to baptize people. That’s what the Catholics and others do to babies who don’t believe. It’s sad, it’s unscriptural and it has nothing to do with the baptism that a believer in the gospel of Christ is supposed to submit to. Hence the instructions of Jesus Himself for His followers to preach the gospel and then to baptize those who believe so they can have their sins remitted through His blood (Mark 16:15-16, Acts 2:38, 22:16, Revelation 1:5).

        5) You have failed again to show how a person earns his or her salvation by simply obeying the will of God. Simply because you call something a work of man does not make it so. I gave you multiple scripture references that show baptism to be a command and a work of God and not man, so please, if you would like to continue the discussion answer this one question: How does a person submitting to God’s command to be baptized cause someone to earn his or her salvation? I don’t mean to sound rude, but if you’re not willing to answer this question that gets back to the original post and your original comment then there isn’t going to be any reason to continue the discussion. Thanks for your time and cooperation.

        • Eugene Adkins 8:27 pm on February 26, 2013 Permalink

          Morris failed to even acknowledge the question again for the third time so unfortunately the conversation had to end.

  • TFRStaff 5:51 am on January 26, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    Christians baptized? 

    I came across this question last week: “Why is it important for Christians to be baptized?”

    It’s not important at all; the Bible knows no such thing!

    The Bible does teach that sinners are baptized into Christ when they confess their faith in Him and repent of their sins (see: Acts 8:35-40, 16:30-31; Mark 16:16; Romans 6:1-4, et. al.).

    Let’s get the order straight: sinners are baptized for the remission of their sins (cf. Acts 2:38). Afterward, they are called Christians.

    Rick Kelley, Prestonsburg KY church bulletin

     
    • Eugene Adkins 8:05 am on January 26, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      I would say it’s proper to say “baptize disciples” (Matthew 28:18-20), but not Christians. Good point, though.

      • J. Randal Matheny 4:28 pm on January 26, 2013 Permalink | Reply

        Correct me if I’m wrong, but I understood that the “baptizing” and “teaching” were participles that explain how the “make disciples” is done.

        • Eugene Adkins 4:49 pm on January 26, 2013 Permalink

          I’m looking at it from the aspect of disciple being simply a learner. You can’t be taught something without being a learner. Hence the order of Matthew 28:19-20…go teach…baptize…teach some more. I believe the word disciple can be used in a much broader sense than just being a Christian. For example, John the baptizer had disciples (Matthew 11:2), but that doesn’t mean they were Christians. I believe whatever translation of Matthew 28 you look at it still says to make disciples (teach), then baptize and then teach further. In the sense that I’m talking about it’s disciple first, Christian second. Don’t know if that’s a “correction” but it is an explanation :)

    • Stephen R. Bradd 8:47 am on January 28, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      I can see both sides on this. I have used “disciple” in the generic sense of “learner” (i.e., in reference to one who is learning but who has not yet obeyed the truth). Perhaps I need to rethink that.

  • J. Randal Matheny 9:05 am on January 10, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , , ,   

    No date so defining for me as today 

    baptism-dead-worldToday is my spiritual birthday. On this day back in 1971 I was united with my Lord. Many dates are important to me, but none so defining as today. I am who I am because of the decision made that day. Not made, actually, but realized. The desire was present long before that.

    My baptism should have happened earlier than at 14 years of age, but my timidity as a youngster held me back. When, that is, if I write an autobiography, it will make for an interesting story. I was the tenth of 10 responses that Sunday morning in the Stonewall church building, set among the Arkansas cotton and soybean fields. The preacher, who normally preached calm and positive lessons, decided a strong dose of hell was needed to jar loose a group of unmoved youth. He was right.

    When all the other motivations are in place, and maybe when they’re not, fear is a great motivator. Fear of “the one who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell” Mt 10.28 NET, especially.

    • Our third precious grandchild was born yesterday afternoon, after a day and a half of agonizing waiting. It might have been a bit tough on the mother in labor, too. This is our oldest son’s first. Our second son forged ahead with two. We hope to visit the newest family addition before long.

    • The FPress website is down. Again. Methinks we’ll be moving from our host server when the account expires. Isn’t technology a wonderful thing, when it works?

    • By coincidence I ran into this yesterday, George Washington’s first inaugural speech as president.

    … there is no truth more thoroughly established, than that there exists in the oeconomy and course of nature, an indissoluble union between virtue and happiness, between duty and advantage, between the genuine maxims of an honest and magnanimous policy, and the solid rewards of public prosperity and felicity: Since we ought to be no less persuaded that the propitious smiles of Heaven, can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right, which Heaven itself has ordained … (More …)

     
  • John T. Polk II 4:03 am on December 21, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , , , , ,   

    Psalm 70 

    Vs. 1: A call for speedy deliverance;

    Vs. 2-3: A request for opponents to be “turned back;”

    Vs. 4: A desire that those who change glorify God;

    Vs. 5: An appeal from the lowly.

    These verses almost duplicate Psalm 40:13-17. Psalm 40 was written by David and prophetically described Jesus’ death. Psalm 70 is projects the communication between God and Jesus just before Jesus died. For comparison, read both Psalms.

    Verse 1: “God” (Elohim) is the same Deity as “LORD” (Jehovah). The call is for God to be “pleased” to hurry with deliverance, but not from the cross. “Now My soul is troubled, and what shall I say? ‘Father, save Me from this hour?’ But for this purpose I came to this hour” (John 12:27).

    Verse 2: Sinners who see the error of their way have a sense of “shame.” When Jesus “said these things, all His adversaries were put to shame; and all the multitude rejoiced for all the glorious things that were done by Him” (Luke 13:17). “Mutual confusion” is the same as “confounded,” and simply expresses the desire for those who wrongly destroy Jesus, to see their error. Shortly after his conversion to Christ, “Saul increased all the more in strength, and confounded the Jews who dwelt in Damascus, proving that this Jesus is the Christ (Acts 9:22).The Gospel challenges the thoughts of sinners. “Turned back” shows a change of direction, “driven backward” indicates conviction to change, add these expressions and “repentance” is the result. Jesus’ cross should cause those who understand its meaning and their own sins, to be driven back from their sins. After He was raised from the dead, “Then He said to them, ‘Thus it is written, and thus it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead the third day, and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem’” (Luke 24:46-47). Verse 3: Those who would say, “Aha, aha” are the Gotcha people. “And as He said these things to them, the scribes and the Pharisees began to assail Him vehemently, and to cross-examine Him about many things, lying in wait for Him, and seeking to catch Him in something He might say, that they might accuse Him” (Luke 11:53-54). Listening for the wrong purpose causes people to not even hear what is said!

    Verse 4: “But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him” (Hebrews 11:6). “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened” (Matthew 7:7-8).

    Verse 5: Jesus Christ on the cross, substituted Himself for sinners who are the “poor and needy.” “For Christ also suffered once for sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive by the Spirit” (1 Peter 3:18). This Psalm ends with a statement both Jesus and a sinner can make. The sinner who repents can make the same acknowledgment that Jesus made: only God can deliver. Jesus, in death, committed His spirit to God (Luke 23:46). The sinner must commit his/her spirit into the hands of God’s design. “Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been united together in the likeness of His death, certainly we also shall be in the likeness of His resurrection” (Romans 6:4-5).

    All Scriptures and comments are based upon the New King James Version, unless otherwise noted.

     
  • Eugene Adkins 6:18 am on December 5, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , Questions and Answers,   

    Quick Answers to Common Objections 

    Those who adhere to “faith only” when it comes to salvation often disagree with the necessity of baptism by offering very common objections. Here are three, followed by very quick answers according to the scriptures of God.

    Objection 1: Baptism is a work of man that violates Ephesians 2:8 which says, “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,”

    Quick Answer: Whoever said baptism is a work of man? Sure it’s something that a person must submit to, but since when has submission ever earned anyone any thing? Baptism is a work of God and hence, it is not a work of man that earns us anything. “In [Jesus] you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead.” (Colossians 2:11-12)

    Objection 2: Baptism is to show one is already saved, not to be saved. The “for” in Acts 2:38 is past tense. A person who is wanted ”for“ robbing a bank is wanted because they robbed a bank in the past, not because they’re going to rob it in the future.

    Quick Answer: When a person ignores context they can make a pretext out of almost any scripture! Acts 2:38 says, “Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.“ Look at the two things the first “and” connects there. A person no more “repents” because they have been saved anymore than they are “baptized” because they have been saved. Repentance always proceeds salvation for the lost as does baptism. “Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent, because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained. He has given assurance of this to all by raising Him from the dead.” (Acts 17:30-31) And by the way, does a person who’s going to the store “for” a loaf of bread go because they already have it, or because they need it? Just asking.

    Objection 3: Jesus condemned the lack of faith and not the lack of baptism in Mark 16:15-16 when He said, “…Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned.”

    Quick Answer: Jesus no more had to condemn the lack of baptism than He did the lack of repentance or confession or faithfulness. Are not these also necessary to be saved? Of course they are! No matter what an unbeliever does they are not saved because they are an unbeliever. Why would anyone want to baptize an unbeliever for the remission of sins when he or she doesn’t even believe in the sins they would be baptized for? Unbelief puts one in a condemned state regardless of anything else. That’s the reason why John 3:18 says, “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” In Mark 16:15 baptism still comes before salvation, like it does in the rest of the scriptures for people who lived after the giving of the Gospel of Christ.

    Much, much more could be said, but then the answers wouldn’t be so quick would they?

    Related articles:

     
  • Ron Thomas 7:00 am on November 19, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism,   

    The New Birth 

    Some time back I received (or picked up) a tract by pastor Paul J. Levin; it was a tract the Central Baptist Church of Decatur passed out. The topic of the tract is the new birth.

    The Scripture says with regard to the new birth: “Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Nicodemus said to him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?” Jesus answered, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God” (John 3:3-5, ESV).

    The Baptist preacher begins by telling us what the new birth is not. It is not religion, morality, or reformation. Second, he tells us what it is. It is a mystery one can’t explain and it is the work of God. Third, he tells us why the new birth is necessary: Jesus said so, we have a sinful nature, and one cannot save himself. Fourth (and last), he tells us how to be born again. He begins by saying it is not of blood, of the will of the flesh, of the will of man, but of God (John 1:11-13). He begins to bring his thoughts to a close by telling us: “The Lord Jesus said you must be born ‘of the SPIRIT.’ It is God’s work, not yours. It is a miracle.”

    In order to receive the new birth he tells us we must receive Christ by faith, praying what is known as the “sinner’s prayer,” read Romans 10:13, and call on the Lord’s name. He closes by saying if one does this: “[t]hen He says you have eternal life!”

    I find it interesting that in the whole tract there is not one mention of what Jesus said about “water.” He had a good deal to say about “Spirit”, but not water. He did not say anything for or against it.

    Nicodemus may not have understood exactly what the Lord knew he should have, but he did understand enough to ask Him about it. I would like to ask the Baptist preacher about what Jesus meant with the use of the word “water.”

    John the Baptist was preaching a baptism of repentance and people less educated than Nicodemus understood him clearly. When Peter and the apostles preached on Pentecost they preached the same message of John 3:3-5; the people understood when Peter answered the question they asked. “ Let all the house of Israel therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.’ Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, ‘Brothers, what shall we do?’ And Peter said to them, ‘Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit’” (Acts 2:36-38, ESV).

    In these biblical illustrations we have biblical examples of what people did to be saved; there is no biblical teaching on the “sinner’s prayer” for salvation, much less an example. The correct doctrine relative to how a person is saved and the proper meaning of John 3:3-5 is an eternally important point, and one not to be missed. If one is wrong on that, then questions like that which Nicodemus had can’t be answered. Fortunately, the Lord did answer the question and for that I am grateful.  (Bulletin article for HCC, 11.18.2012)

     
    • John Henson 12:30 pm on November 20, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      So many logical contradictions! If the new birth is “a mystery one can’t explain,” then why does he attempt to explain it? If the new birth is not “by the will of man” then why tell anyone to pray “the sinner’s prayer?” If the new birth is only the work of God, and man cannot do anything to achieve it (which is, of course, irresistible grace), then why do anything at all?

    • Robert E. Barger 1:10 pm on November 25, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      To understand the New Birth you must “believe” all the scriptures that pretain to it. It tells us in John 1:13 But as many as recieve Him gave He “power” to BECOME SONS OF GOD, even to them that believe on his name:
      1:14 Which were born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.(It is God that gives us the gift of the Holy Ghost! It’s not by anything that we do The only thing we can do is believe that Jesus is our Saviour and all that we can do is believe and repent!)
      This scripture tells us that The key to recieving the Holy Ghost (not Holy Spirit) is belief. If you don’t believe, you will not recieve. This scripture is stressed in Hebrews chapter three and Chapter Four and we are warned that the children of Israel could not enter into the promised land because of their unbelief. The word in them did not profit them not being mixed with faith. We are warned in Hebrewa 3:12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God. This is what Jesus was telling Nicodemus in John 3:3, you must be born again to “SEE” the Kingdom. You can only “see” the Kingdom by recieving the Holy Ghost. (John chapter 14, I go to prepare a place for you, that where I am, you may be also!)
      The scripture in Matthew 28:19-20 is also a differant why of saying what Jesus told Nicodemus in John Chapter 3:3-5. All power is given unto me in Heaven and in earth, go ye therefore and “TEACH ALL NATIONS, baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost! TEACHING THEM TO OBSERVE ALL THINGS WHATSOEVER I HAVE COMMANDED YOU, AND LO, I AM WITH YOU, EVEN UNTO THE END OF THE WORLD!
      There is a baptism in the Holy Ghost, There is a baptism into the Son, (The Word Of God) and there is a baptism into the Father (LOVE) where we do not sin!
      1 John 3:8 & 9
      He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose was the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the words of the devil.
      3:9
      Whosoever is born of God (The Father) DOTH NOT COMMIT SIN; (Why?) for his seed (Adam nature) for his seed remaineth in him and he cannot sin because he is BORN OF GOD.
      3:10
      In this the children of God are manifested and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness IS NOT OF GOD, NEITHER HE THAT LOVETH NOT HIS BROTHER.
      Jesus said in Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
      2 Timothy 3:15-17
      15) And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
      16) All scripture is given by the inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
      17) That the man of God may be “perfect”, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

  • Eugene Adkins 6:26 am on November 15, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    To seek what’s Above, You have to be buried Below! 

    If then you were raised with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ is, sitting at the right hand of God. Set your mind on things above, not on things on the earth.” (Colossians 3:1-2, NKJV)

    My ‘spiritual’ background is based firmly on being taught as a young person that baptism was not “to be saved” but rather was “for the saved.” This goes to show you how the truth can fade into the background if one isn’t careful with their own personal study of God’s word!

    After obeying the gospel (part of which included my submission to God through baptism to receive the remission of my sins) Colossians 3:1-2 became one of those places in scripture that made the Bible’s teaching on baptism so abundantly clear to me. Listen to what Paul said. He said, ”if you were raised with Christ….” This is a big deal. Paul is saying if we’re raised with Christ then we’re to set our mind on a higher calling and home. It makes one wonder if one is raised with Christ (in this present time and life) then when was one buried with Christ??? Praise God, because one doesn’t have to wonder! Paul answers the question he created himself:

    In [Jesus] you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sinsof the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead.” (Colossians 2:11-12)

    Buried when? When we submit to God in baptism! Buried for what? To be raised with Christ to set our affections on/to seek those things above! You go down a soiled sinner and you come up a shinning saint (Colossians 1:19-23).

    There’s no question to it if we read all of what Paul has to say to the Colossians. Many people have an opinion about the role of baptism when it comes to salvation, but opinions stop where the truth of scripture begins. To seek what’s above we have to first be buried below. It’s that clear, but do you want to see it?

     
  • Chad Dollahite 2:44 pm on September 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , baptism, , ,   

    “A Sweet Savor…” – To Whom??? 

    In the book of Exodus, chapter 29, there are three different occasions when God mentions a sacrifice as being “a sweet savor.”  “And thou shalt burn the whole ram upon the altar:  it is a burnt offering unto the LORD:  it is a sweet savor, an offering made by fire unto the LORD” (v. 18).  “And thou shalt receive them of their hands, and burn them upon the altar for a burnt offering, for a sweet savor before the LORD:  it is an offering made by fire unto the LORD” (v. 25).  “And the other lamb thou shalt offer at even, and shalt do thereto according to the meat offering of the morning, and according to the drink offering thereof, for a sweet savor, an offering made by fire unto the LORD” (v. 41).

    As I read Exodus 29, that phrase, “a sweet savor” caught my attention, and the thought kept coming to mind, “Sweet?  To whom?”  (More …)

     
  • TFRStaff 7:33 am on September 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , New Testament Christianity   

    Teaching And Baptism 

    By Mel Futrell Shades Mountain church of Christ

    You can’t be taught wrong and baptized right and you can’t be baptized wrong and be right was the old saying of many sound gospel preachers through the years and for that matter still is. I’ve heard it all my life and believe that in principle it accurately represents the teaching of the New Testament. But growing numbers in the church today would have us believe that some denominational groups are our brethren because they immerse and therefore we should have some level of fellowship with them. At the outset I remind you that the General Baptists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, and Seventh-Day Adventists also immerse and claim to do it for the remission of sins. Are they then our brethren?

    In answer to this I’ll begin by asking two companion questions: Are there Christians in the religious denominations? and Can one be taught wrong and baptized right? Let’s now review these related concepts.

    (More …)

     
    • Russ McCullough 9:53 pm on September 8, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Very sound, Steve. I’m reminded that the Mormons got their ideas about baptism from a wayward Christian, Sidney Rigdon. Mormons, however, cannot be Christians for they are not baptized “in the Name of Jesus Christ” for the Christ of the Mormon church never existed. The issue you raise is perhaps the most urgent of our times. Evangelism has fallen off among us, I believe, because many have somehow convinced themselves that their family, friends and neighbors in various denominations are “saved.” “Saved” people don’t need “saving” again. Very bad theology but it is at the heart of our current apostasy.

  • Eugene Adkins 6:23 am on July 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , , ,   

    Funny Way to Make A Serious to Point 

    Here’s a short, but good and funny article from Harry Middleton of the Lebanon Road church in Nashville, TN.

    It’s titled: Search the scriptures!!! I thought someone may want to use it for a reference or a bulletin article.

    Great truths may sometimes be stated in amusing ways. I found the following statement of truth amusing and thought provoking. It is taken from “Wells of Thought.”

    Jacob Ditzler and J. S. Sweeny were having a debate on the scriptural mode of baptism. Ditzler showed a secondary meaning of the word BAPTIZE to wash or sprinkle.

    In reply, brother Sweeny showed that a secondary meaning of BELIEVE was to have an opinion and a secondary meaning of SAVE was to be pickled.

    Then he gave the resulting translation of Mark 16:16, “He that hath an opinion and is sprinkled shall be pickled.”

    He then raised the question, “Is it our aim to see what we can make out of the scriptures, or is it to find out what God has said?”

     
  • Stephen R. Bradd 9:39 pm on July 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, weinberg   

    Bible Baptism [Letter to the Editor] 

    Fellows, I must submit this soon. If you have any suggestions, please share them quickly. Thanks, -SRB

    Bible Baptism

    Dr. Weinberg wrote a piece recently on baptism. I would like to take this opportunity to supplement and correct a few of his statements.

    The Greek word “baptizo” does mean to immerse, submerge, or to overwhelm. However, contrary to what Weinberg stated, the baptismal element is not inherent in the term itself but must be supplied contextually. In the Scriptures it is true that often the baptismal element is water, but such is not always the case. An example of this can be seen in Jesus’ words in Luke 12:50 – “But I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how distressed I am till it is accomplished!” Jesus was not referring to water baptism here but rather to His approaching crucifixion, wherein He would be overwhelmed (“baptized”) in suffering. This baptism had nothing to do with water.

    Weinberg also expressed uncertainly regarding whether or not Jesus Himself ever baptized anyone. The New Testament is clear on this. John 4:2 states that Jesus did not baptize anyone personally in water, though His disciples did.

    Although the history of baptism which Weinberg shared is intriguing in some ways, what is important for those who claim to believe in the Bible as the word of God is to simply understand and obey what the Scriptures teach about baptism. Humanity has long had a tendency to corrupt God-given practices and turn them into man-made traditions. It can be proven from the New Testament that baptism (immersion) was always a burial (never sprinkling or pouring; Col. 2:12). It can also be proven from the New Testament that penitent believers in Jesus were immersed in water for the remission of their sins (Acts 2:38; Mark 16:16). The power of forgiveness is not found in the water intrinsically but in one’s full submission to the divine will (I Pet. 3:21). Saul of Tarsus is an excellent example of this. He spoke with Jesus on the road to Damascus (evidencing faith), he fasted and prayed for several days (evidencing repentance), but he was still in his sins (thus, in a lost condition) when Ananias came to him and commanded – “Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins” (Acts 22:16). Contrary to popular belief, Saul was not saved on the road; he was still in his sins three days later! If we believe the New Testament, we will believe that immersion is essential to salvation.

    Weinberg affirmed that “Apostolic Tradition explicitly provides for [infant baptism].” All the “Apostolic Tradition” a Christian needs today is found in the New Testament (Gal. 1:6-9), and in those 27 books there is no compelling evidence that infants were immersed. Besides, since faith and repentance are prerequisites to baptism, how can an infant even qualify? Infants are born pure and sinless (Ezek. 18:20; Matt. 18:3,4). They have no need of immersion to wash sins away.

    For a more thorough study of Bible baptism, please visit: Baptism.AudioEvangelism.com. As always, it would be my pleasure to discuss these matters further with any interested party.
    -Stephen R. Bradd, Clinton Church of Christ

     
    • Roy Coffman 9:48 pm on July 2, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Another book that is well worth the cost and the time it takes to read 860 pages is Everett Ferguson’s Baptism In the Early Church – History, Theology, and the Liturgy in the first Five Centuries.

      • J. Randal Matheny 3:05 pm on July 3, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Roy, that’s one of his that I don’t have. Need to get it, for sure. If it’s anywhere near his book on the church, and I’m sure it is.

  • TFRStaff 9:03 am on March 26, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, J.D. Tant,   

    Story about J.D. Tant 

    Be sure to read on the second page of “The Southwesterner” an interesting story about J.D. Tant.

    SW 3-25-12.pdf

     
  • Ron Thomas 9:02 am on March 21, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism   

    A reflection to bring a smile 

    A practical view of baptism

    By Michael Carey
    Anchorage Daily News

    By Michael Carey Anchorage Daily News (Published: March 20th, 2012 08:09 PM)

    Back in the old days when Alaska had summer, I got up on a bright, warm morning and headed for the Daily News on foot.

    I had been reading a memoir by a prominent New York writer and pieces of it were rattling around my brain. The writer was born and raised in small-town Illinois and wrote at length about his ancestors who settled there after the Civil War.

    The ancestors were deeply religious. Many followed the teachings of the famed evangelist Alexander Campbell, a pioneer of the giant revival meeting.

    The ancestors dedication to the Christian faith eventually ripped the family into two factions. The factions disagreed about baptism; they eventually could not discuss it. One faction believed in full immersion baptism, the other in sprinkling. A full-immersioner taunted a sprinkler “Show me, show me in the Bible where scripture endorses sprinkling.”

    After a few minutes of walking, I saw two old men standing on a corner. They seemed to be hesitant, confused. I approached them, told them my name and asked if the needed help. Yes, one of them explained they were momentarily lost. They were visitors to Anchorage and after arriving from Georgia the night before, they had gone for a morning walk. They were in town for a church revival and were house guests of a couple they met only hours ago. They participated in Alaska revivals every summer.

    We walked along together for a few minutes before the more talkative of the old-timers had a Eureka moment and announced we were close to where they were billeted. Another block and we were at the door of the house.

    The old-timers thanked me for my concern. We chatted briefly.
    I was curious what the men, given their experience, made of the full-immersion versus sprinkling controversy and told them about it.

    “Michael,” the more talkative senior said “it’s Michael, right?” Yes I replied. “Michael remember, this isn’t the first time I have been to Alaska. I have been to McKinley Park, and I put my hands in some of those streams up there, so I know how cold the water is in Alaska. Michael, I have done baptisms, but I’m not doing full immersion baptisms around here. Forget it.”

    The three of us laughed, shook hands, and said good-bye.

    – Michael Carey

    (Bill Clary sent this out; I had to share it)

     
  • Glenda Williams 2:33 pm on November 1, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    One hundred pound weight lifted 

    Yesterday afternoon Harry Adkison, preacher at the Samson, AL church, was eating in Hall’s Oyster Bar, Geneva, when Mike Ezell, a local jeweler and long-time friend, came in and sat down beside him. Mike mentioned that he was glad to see Harry and  that he had wanted to talk to him about something a long time. (More …)

     
    • Mike Riley 9:26 pm on November 1, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Wonderful news, Glenda! Along with the angels, we rejoice that Mike Ezell chose to obey his Lord in baptism. May the Lord richly bless him and his family for his decision.

  • John T. Polk II 11:20 am on September 20, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    Baptism for the Dead 

    Question: I have a friend that is an ex Church of God pastor. He asked me to get your thoughts on 1st Corinthians 15:29, I believe this is the passage the Mormons cite for being baptized for your ancestors.
    Answer: The section of Scripture under discussion is 1 Corinthians 15:20-32: “But now Christ is risen from the dead, and has become the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. 21 For since by man came death, by Man also came the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. 23 But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at His coming. 24 Then comes the end, when He delivers the kingdom to God the Father, when He puts an end to all rule and all authority and power. 25 For He must reign till He has put all enemies under His feet. 26 The last enemy that will be destroyed is death. 27 For ‘He has put all things under His feet.’ But when He says ‘all things are put under Him,’ it is evident that He who put all things under Him is excepted. 28 Now when all things are made subject to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subject to Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all. 29 Otherwise, what will they do who are baptized for the dead, if the dead do not rise at all? Why then are they baptized for the dead? 30 And why do we stand in jeopardy every hour? 31 I affirm, by the boasting in you which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily. 32 If, in the manner of men, I have fought with beasts at Ephesus, what advantage is it to me? If the dead do not rise, “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die!”
    Of particular interest is verse 29. Who is “the dead” referred to here?
    1. It cannot mean that living people are baptized to save souls of those who have physically died, for Jesus taught that souls after death cannot be changed because of the “great gulf” between the two states (Luke 16:19-31). Paul, in Hebrews 9:27-28, clearly taught there is nothing after one’s death but the judgment to come;
    2. Certainly it cannot mean that unsaved persons can save the lost souls by being immersed in water, for Jesus told a would-be disciple “let the dead bury their own dead” (Matthew 8:21-22), that is, let those who, under the Law of Moses, don’t respect God’s ordinance of cleanliness after touching a dead body (Numbers 19:11-22) bury a corpse. Following Jesus should be more important than the delay of burying a dead person’s body;
    3. In 1 Corinthians 15:20-32, the doctrine is stated that Jesus Christ rose from the grave never to “die” again (verses 20-23), and now reigns over His people until death, itself, is destroyed (verses 24-28). Baptism in water is essential for entering Jesus’ kingdom and being one of His obedient disciples (Matthew 7:21; 28:18-20; John 3:5; Acts 8:12; 18:8). Baptism is a burial into Jesus’ death, but then one is raised from it (resurrection) to a new life in Christ (Romans 6:3-5). If Jesus Christ was not raised from the dead, then baptism could not be the point of cleansing from sin by Jesus’ death to arise as a cleansed creature (2 Corinthians 5:17). IF Jesus had not been raised from the dead, then what appeal should baptism have? In other words, baptism becomes a meaningless symbol if Jesus Christ were not raised (1 Corinthians 15:12-19), and those who now were dead (at the time Paul wrote, 1 Corinthians 15:6) would have been baptized for nothing! Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 15:29 is simply showing a consequence of stripping the resurrection of Jesus Christ out of the Gospel and stating the obvious: why be baptized to enter a dead man, Jesus, if, indeed, He was not raised from the dead Himself?
    The Mormon doctrine of baptizing someone to “save” a departed spirit certainly qualifies as “water salvation,” for it puts salvation of a soul purely on the cleaning in the water and not the obedience of the one who is supposedly saved! In that sense, there is no difference in the concept of Roman Catholicism’s “Purgatory” and Mormonism’s “Baptism for the Dead.” There is no mystical, magical cleansing of any soul who has left this life, according to Jesus, and whatever practice(s) people may invent to claim it, must be false.
    —–John T. Polk II

     
    • Don Ruhl 7:05 pm on September 20, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      John,

      I recently preached a sermon on this, and so I am going to attempt to paste my sermon into this reply form. If that does not work, I will see if I can post the PDF.

      Don Ruhl

      P.S. Okay, the paste did not work well, because it completely removed my outline format, and trying to put the PDF here, only resulted in a URL of the location of it on my computer. So, I am going to paste the sermon without the outline format, and hopefully, you will be able to figure it out.

      Baptism for the Dead
      What does it mean to be baptized for the dead?
      First Corinthians 15.29
      Don Ruhl • Savage Street, Grants Pass, Oregon • August 21, AD 2011
      Scripture Reader and Reading: Michael Crisp – Romans 6.1–10
      Prelude:
      This is not a repeat of a March 2010, class I taught on First Corinthians 15.
      Persuasion:
      The Various Interpretations of First Corinthians 15.29
      Most interpretations are tainted with the Mormon practice,
      that of proxy or vicarious baptism,
      that of being baptized for someone else
      who has already died, and
      by being baptized for them to save them from eternal condemnation.
      However, we know that the rest of the New Testament on baptism,
      does not support such an interpretation or practice.
      Baptism is for believers.
      Some believe that Paul refers to a pagan practice taking place in Corinth.
      However, why would he do that?
      It does not fit his argument.
      He does not do this anywhere else in his argument.
      Moreover, he refers to an accepted or approved practice.
      Some believe that Paul refers to a practice some had initiated in the church,
      although a false practice, but
      that he is assuming, “for the sake of argument,” that it is true, and
      that denying the resurrection also denied
      this practice that they had accepted.
      I can see some merit in this view, but
      it still does not fit the flow of his argument.
      He is presenting to them true doctrines
      that the denial of the resurrection also deny.
      I will show you that Paul’s main argument (vv. 12–19),
      is that false doctrine always implies other falsehoods.
      I believe that verses 29–34 continue
      the method of argument that he used in verses 12–19.
      The problems with these interpretations.
      They assign some validity to the Mormon practice.
      They assume that Paul would suddenly incorporate into his argument
      a pagan practice
      when that was not something he had done thus far.
      Why bring that into the argument?
      It does not make sense.
      They isolate the expression from the context.
      Much of the birth of denominationalism
      has resulted from neglecting the context.
      I believe that many disagreements among brethren over the years,
      has also resulted from this.
      I have seen many Christians question God for this reason.
      Every time you have a question about a difficult text,
      always seek to understand the context first
      before you consult other passages of Scripture and commentaries.
      The context is important, because
      well, it was said in a context for a reason, but
      so much of the time when we cannot figure things out,
      it is because we do not know why the writer said it, and so
      we lock in on the exact phrase or whatever it is, and
      our thinking starts to go in all sorts of directions from there,
      leading to wild theories.
      This is why I like to do expository preaching and
      to preach through Bible Books.
      Therefore, remember again,
      that other passages are important, and
      commentaries can be helpful, but
      nothing is more important to consider
      than the context.
      Realtors say it is location, location, location, and
      in biblical interpretation it is context, context, context.
      Understand the context of that biblical book.
      Understand the immediate context of the text.
      Understand how it fits with the rest of the biblical story.
      Our problem is that we often think of the Bible
      as a collection of wise sayings and good stories
      without any connection to one another and
      without seeing how they fit into God’s Scheme of Redemption,
      that is, how they fit into the one story of the Bible.
      The chapter and verse divisions have not helped, but
      have tended to break up the train of thought,
      especially when Bibles divide verses into paragraphs.
      I know all this makes it easier to find a verse quickly, but
      it also hampers a correct understanding of the Bible.
      So then, what is the context of Paul’s reference to “baptism for the dead”?
      Refuting the Denial of the Resurrection
      First Corinthians 15.1–11 • Witnesses to the Resurrection of Christ
      Without saying that he is refuting resurrection-deniers,
      he begins by reminding them of his preaching among them, 

1 Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you—unless you believed in vain (1Co 15.1, 2). 

      What he had previously preached among them,
      they also accepted, and
      they stood in that doctrine, and
      that preaching had saved them, but
      only if they held onto what he had previously revealed to them,
      unless when they initially believed it was all vain.
      What then did he preach? 

3 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve (1Co 15.3–5). 

      First, he delivered what he had received from God:
      That Christ died,
      That Christ was buried,
      That Christ rose again, and
      That many people witnessed the resurrected Christ.
      Notice what Paul did on that fourth point.
      He said Peter and later all the apostles saw the resurrected Jesus.
      Paul continued to give more space to the witnesses, 

6 After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. 7 After that He was seen by James, then by all the apostles. 8 Then last of all He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time (1Co 15.6–8). 

      Over 514 people witnessed the resurrected Christ, and
      some of them saw Him more than once, so
      over 527 times people saw the resurrected Christ.
      Why did he say so much about the witnesses to the resurrection of Christ?
      Paul did not elaborate on the first two items of the Gospel.
      Every member of the church accepted the death, burial, and
      so they thought, resurrection of Christ.
      However, we will find out shortly,
      that some of the Corinthians denied the resurrection, and so
      before Paul mentions that
      he wanted to remind them of
      what he had preached and
      what they had accepted,
      as he continued to say, 

9 For I am the least of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace toward me was not in vain; but I labored more abundantly than they all, yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me. 11 Therefore, whether it was I or they, so we preach and so you believed (1Co 15.9–11). 

      Although he had witnessed the resurrected Christ,
      Paul knew he was not worthy to be an apostle, but
      that did not get in the way of two things (v. 19):
      What he preached (which from God, v. 3), and
      what they believed, at least initially.
      Therefore, if all that is true that he mentions in verses 1–11,
      especially his preaching that they had accepted,
      he then presented a question,
      that begins to refute the error being proclaimed by some at Corinth.
      All of them would have followed Paul approvingly in verses 1–11.
      First Corinthians 15.12–19 • The Implications of Denying the Resurrection 

12 Now if Christ is preached that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? (1Co 15.12). 

      Here is where he caught them!
      They had not thought through their denial of the resurrection, because
      they had denied the very thing they had affirmed earlier.
      Then he began to show them the implications of denying the resurrection, 

13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen. 14 And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty. 15 Yes, and we are found false witnesses of God, because we have testified of God that He raised up Christ, whom He did not raise up—if in fact the dead do not rise. 16 For if the dead do not rise, then Christ is not risen. 17 And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins! 18 Then also those who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men the most pitiable (1Co 15.13–19). 

      Denying the resurrection, implies:
      That Christ was not raised, which led to more implications:
      The preaching of the apostles was empty, and
      the faith of the Corinthians was empty,
      That the apostles were false witnesses,
      That faith is futile,
      That we are still in our sins,
      That dead Christians have vanished,
      That we are to be pitied.
      First Corinthians 15.20–28 • The Doctrine of the Resurrection
      In these verses Paul affirmed the general resurrection, and
      set out the order, the timing, and other happenings at the resurrection.
      Notice verses 20 and 23 in particular, 

20 But now Christ is risen from the dead, and has become the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep… 23 But each one in his own order: Christ the firstfruits, afterward those who are Christ’s at His coming (1Co 15.20, 23). 

      One of the reasons that Jesus rose from the dead
      was to give us hope for our resurrection from the dead, but
      if the dead do not rise, then
      Jesus is not the firstfruits, and
      we shall forever vanish when we die.
      First Corinthians 15.29–34 • Questions that Need to Be Answered
      Here Paul went back to refuting the resurrection–deniers,
      primarily by asking them questions, as he did in verse 12, 

29 Otherwise, what will they do who are baptized for the dead, if the dead do not rise at all? Why then are they baptized for the dead? 30 And why do we stand in jeopardy every hour? 31 I affirm, by the boasting in you which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily. 32 If, in the manner of men, I have fought with beasts at Ephesus, what advantage is it to me? If the dead do not rise, “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die!” 33 Do not be deceived: “Evil company corrupts good habits.” 34 Awake to righteousness, and do not sin; for some do not have the knowledge of God. I speak this to your shame (1Co 15.29–34). 

      We baptize for preparation or in anticipation of going to the dead,
      that is, our baptism prepares us for death,
      knowing that a resurrection shall happen.
      Why were you baptized?
      You wanted to avoid going to hell, and you wanted to go to heaven.
      For this to happen, you have to follow Christ,
      which is Paul’s point in another passage on baptism, but
      now consider how it fits in this context, 

3 Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? 4 Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. 5 For if we have been united together in the likeness of His death, certainly we also shall be in the likeness of His resurrection… 8 Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him (Rom 6.3–5, 8). 

      We died with Christ in baptism, and
      have been raised, hoping that our bodies shall be raised.
      Yet, if there is no resurrection of, or from the dead,
      why be baptized with the dead in mind, that is,
      knowing that we shall go to the dead and later be raised?
      They were denying the very practice
      that had saved them from their sins, and
      upon which the Gospel of First Corinthians 15.1–5 is based!
      Remember back in verses 20 and 23,
      that Christ is the firstfruits of the resurrection,
      meaning that He was the first one, and others shall follow Him!
      He continued his argument in verse 30,
      that if there is no resurrection,
      then he risked his life constantly for nothing.
      The way he suffered, he died daily (v. 31).
      If the dead do not rise,
      he says to make the most of today,
      for there is no future life (v. 32).
      Someone sought to lead them into immorality
      by denying the resurrection (vv. 33, 34).
      First Corinthians 15.35–49 • The Nature of the Resurrection
      Knowing that some questioned the resurrection because
      they did not understand how it could happen,
      he explained the nature of the resurrection in verses 35–49.
      First Corinthians 15.50–58 • The Reason for the Resurrection
      Finally, he shows that we have to be resurrected
      that our bodies might be changed to inherit the kingdom of heaven.
      Exhortation:
      So then, have you been baptized yet
      because you are dead and
      need to be rise to walk in newness of life?
      If you are dead in the spirit now, and
      remain in that condition when you die in the body,
      you will be dead throughout eternity,
      experiencing the second death, and
      that is not a total cessation of existence, but
      an eternal separation from God and all that is good and pleasant.
      You may believe in God,
      accept the truth that Jesus is the Son of God,
      try to live a good life, but
      if you have not been baptized,
      you are still dead, and
      have not been raised to walk the new life in Christ.
      Why not be baptized now?

  • Richard Mansel 4:52 pm on August 13, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    Baptized for the Dead 

    On Sunday morning, I am speaking on Purgatory. That leads to the issue of baptism for the dead (1 Corinthians 15:29).

    When I was reading what others have written about it, the general consensus is that it does not mean vicarious baptism because it was not being practiced at the time by the church as a whole, but that we do not fully understand what it means.

    One writer said that Paul appears to be making the point that detractors were denying the resurrection but that even pagans believed in the doctrine, since they were practicing vicarious baptism.

    What do you think the passage means?

     
    • J. Randal Matheny 7:36 pm on August 13, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Thistleton (highly recommended) on 1 Cor. makes a strong case that it means being baptized in order to see one’s dearly beloved deceased in the Lord. Seems to fit best with all other evidence of Christian baptism. I thought I had written on it somewhere, but I cannot find it just now.

    • Richard Hill 10:22 pm on August 13, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, we finished 1 Corinthians a few weeks back and of course had a discussion about this passage. My comment got long so I’ll make it a separate post.

  • TFRStaff 3:26 pm on July 19, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    ‘Appeal to obedient faith’ studies baptism 

    Dan Mayfield of Owatonna, Minn., offers this four-page evangelistic appeal on Google Docs for printing out and study. Fill in the blanks, with plenty of explanatory text.

     
  • Stephen R. Bradd 8:55 am on July 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism   

    Baptism Will Not… 

    In a number of past lessons, we have presented what the New Testament teaches regarding baptism. Bible baptism is immersion in water in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit for the forgiveness of sins. It must be preceded by faith and repentance. The place of baptism is unimportant. The time of baptism is unimportant, but the sooner the better. Furthermore, only those who meet the conditions should be baptized. Baptism is required for those who want to enter the kingdom of Christ and have their sins washed away via His blood; it is required for salvation (cf. 03/12/05, 03/19/05, 03/26/05, 09/15/05, 12/08/07, 10/31/08, and 08/14/10).

    However, despite the value and importance placed on baptism by the New Testament writers, there are some things that baptism simply cannot do.

    BAPTISM WILL NOT TURN A BABY INTO A CHRISTIAN.
    “He who believes and is baptized will be saved” (Mark 16:16). Although they could be forcibly immersed in water, infants cannot believe in Jesus. Thus, they cannot meet the two-fold requirement Jesus specifies here. Faith comes when one hears, understands, and trusts God’s word as true (cf. Rom. 10:17). Babies cannot understand or trust God’s word. Some have wondered: “If an infant dies, is she lost?” The answer is “No,” since babies are born pure and without sin (cf. Ezek. 18:20). Truthfully, they have no need for immersion. Baptism will make a baby wet, but it won’t turn her into a Christian.

    BAPTISM WILL NOT PERMIT YOU TO KEEP THAT WHICH DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU.
    “Repent and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins” (Acts 2:38). When one repents he has a change of mind that should lead to a change of life (cf. Matt. 3:8). Zacchaeus, desiring to please Christ, realized the need to make restitution to those he had stolen from (e.g., Luke 19:8,9). Those who desire to please God today should restore anything in their possession that does not belong to them. Baptism will not permit you to retain a watch, a car, or even a wife that is not rightfully yours (cf. Matt. 14:4).

    BAPTISM WILL NOT SANCTIFY AN UNGODLY LIFESTYLE.
    This point is related to the prior one. When one is Scripturally baptized, his past sins are forgiven by God. This is true whether one is a drug addict, a drunkard, an adulterer, a murderer, etc. However, baptism is not a license to continue in those same sins! The fruits of repentance are required! Christians are to deny ungodliness and worldly lusts and strive to “live soberly, righteously, and godly in the present age” (Titus 2:12).

    BAPTISM WILL NOT EXEMPT ONE FROM PENALTIES OF THE LAW.
    Years ago I can recall a man who obeyed the gospel and got his life right with the Lord. Less than one year later he was in prison for a crime he had committed prior to becoming a Christian. Although God had forgiven him, he still had to answer for the civil law he had broken. Baptism doesn’t wash away all consequences of sin. Sin scars and baptism doesn’t override the penalties imposed by the government for crime.

    BAPTIZING LARGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE WILL NOT MAKE A FALSE TEACHER RIGHT BEFORE GOD.
    There were false teachers in the first century and there are false teachers today. Often they are very personable and friendly; they don’t look like wolves on the surface (cf. Matt. 7:15ff)! Jesus taught His disciples to ascertain the difference between genuine and false teachers by examining their fruits. Does this mean we are to consider which teachers produce the most baptisms and automatically determine that their fruit is the most and therefore the best? Certainly not! There is much more involved to examining spiritual fruit than counting heads. A sound and faithful preacher will do his best to both preach the truth and convert lost souls. It is a mistake to think that a busy baptistery compensates for false doctrine in the pulpit (cf. II Tim. 4:1-5).

    Baptism is a foundational part of New Testament Christianity and exceedingly important. But, there are some things it can never do. Don’t place your hope in the mistaken notions exposed above. To do such will only lead to disappointment and destruction!

     
    • Laura 10:12 am on July 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Excellent, Stephen. This would make a very good sermon.

    • Mike Riley 10:43 am on July 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Great scriptural points, Stephen!

      The thoughts in your post need to be preached from every pulpit and taught in every Bible class in the land.

      In the Lord’s eyes, ignorance is not bliss nor will it be excused on Judgment Day.

    • Rick Kelley 2:20 pm on July 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Amen!

  • joyjensen 7:53 am on May 23, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    Our Sunday 

    Yesterday George preached a great lesson on Responsibilities of Husbands and Wives.  In all likelihood that’s the first of its kind for many of the listeners yesterday.  We ended the day with a baptism of a young man who has been studying with our translator for a couple of months.  We have great hopes for this young man – he has truly been a searcher.  You can read more about it at our travelblog:  http://www.travelblog.org/Africa/Tanzania/Centre/Iringa/blog-613978.html

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 5:51 pm on May 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism,   

    Guest on iQuest podcast, about baptism 

    http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/90661

    8 p.m. tonight EDT, on baptism, on Madison AL podcast, iQuest.

    UPDATE: The podcast is archived and can be heard any time, if you’re still interested in it.

     
    • Adam 11:08 am on May 18, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      This reply isn’t about baptism but on the article of 5/17/11 “The I’s have it”. I just want to let you know that I fully agree with what you said. This is true in my own family. I have three kids. Only one of the three calls me every day. She is the oldest. If I hear from my son it only for a brief moment. This hurts me to no degree. I brood about it a lot. My other daughter calls me once in a while. Their mother is in real bad health. She is presently in the hospital. It is not looking good for her. We have a good relationship. She is my ex-wife. I really like to read your emails. This is my first time stumbling on these articles of yours that inspired me to respond.

      Thanks, Adam

      • J. Randal Matheny 3:22 pm on May 18, 2011 Permalink | Reply

        Hi, Adam, thanks for your comment. Glad you responded. I pray things will improve with your kids. Sorry to hear about your ex-wife’s bad health.

  • John Henson 8:35 am on April 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    A Surprising Conversion 

    My father studied with a man who had belonged to the Baptist church and was never able to “turn on the light” for him.

    When I took over preaching duties from my father in the church, it was my turn to study with him and I failed to lead him to the truth. He was so deeply entrenched in that doctrine since his family for several generations had taught him so that he was thoroughly entrenched.

    About 20 years passed and news reached me he had been baptized. Though delighted, I was surprised he finally obeyed his Lord. When I saw him, I expressed my happiness that we were brothers, and asked him what had happened to convince him to obey the gospel.

    He said he obeyed the gospel because of the conduct of his wife. Through the years, her faithful Christian example convinced him of the truth and he obeyed the gospel. The Apostle Peter wrote, “Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives,” (1 Peter 3:1 ESV).

     
  • Glenda Williams 8:03 am on March 23, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism,   

    One Baptized Yesterday 

    Carolyn Vickers was baptized into Christ yesterday afternoon at the Geneva church of Christ. Carolyn had studied with her husband in their home and was attending services of the church. At the time she requested baptism, they, along with Douglas Williams, were studying the second lesson in the 3-lesson Open Bible Study. Today they will complete the third lesson.  Lynn, Carolyn’s husband, baptized her. After the baptism they shared a quick kiss in the baptistery.

     
    • J. Randal Matheny 2:36 pm on March 23, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Great new, Glenda. God bless Carolyn. Be sure to share it with Rick over on Baptism365.com.

  • J. Randal Matheny 7:31 pm on March 7, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    The sermon that got me forward 

    You’ve heard me tell it before, I think, but I was the last of 10 young people, all from Christian homes, who need a bit of a push to make the decision to become disciples. The preacher discoursed on hell, not one of his usual topics, but the subject provided us the needed motivation to break our hands loose from the pew and move our feet forward.

    Even that didn’t budge this profoundly timid youth, until I saw my younger sister go down the aisle.

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 5:08 am on March 7, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , ,   

    Daily Nudge: baptism truth or sermon 

    What sermon, lesson or truth did you hear on the day you were baptized? Or, that prompted your decision to become a Christian? It may be some time elapsed between the hearing and the deciding.

    In some places the only evangelism is done from the pulpit, so I didn’t want my question to reflect that sad reality.

     
  • Richard Mansel 12:19 pm on March 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    We Rejoice 

    We rejoice that we had a baptism this morning. If we are not thrilled and edified to see a soul being immersed into Christ, we need to seriously re-evaluate our spiritual condition. We rejoice for this young man and pray that he has a long, fruitful life in Christ. God be praised!

     
    • Mike Riley 2:27 pm on March 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Yes, we should always be thankful and thrilled that men and women, both young and old have the desire to render obedience to the will of the Lord! May God be glorified and we be edified as a result.

    • J. Randal Matheny 3:59 pm on March 6, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Amen! Be sure and share it with Rick on baptism365.com

  • J. Randal Matheny 1:16 pm on February 25, 2011 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    Graphic on baptism in Christ 

    We thank Cougan Collins for the permission to reproduce this graphic from his webpage, “How Do You Get Saved?

     
  • Mike Riley 3:53 pm on November 30, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: agency, baptism, , , , , foreign, , interdenomination, , , ,   

    God’s Work Continues? 

    Here’s a site I found today while scanning some Twitter posts. This gives us an idea of what the Lord’s church is up against in foreign countries (as well as our own country).

    Here is an interdenominational mission agency in Thailand that is promoting the idea that baptism is not a part of the conversion process, but is simply an afterthought, i.e. “if you want to” (note the last paragraph).

    http://www.omfisaan.org/?p=431#more-431

    This is why I added a question mark to the title of this article. Is God’s work really “continuing” with the promotion of this false teaching?

    The devil is still hard at work deceiving folks (Revelation 12:9)..

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 3:45 am on November 14, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , ,   

    Catholicism on the move 

    Two items came to my attention yesterday about developments in the Catholic Church.

    First, the pope released a document, “The Word of God in the Life and Mission of the Church.” From the noise, it would appear to be a major pronouncement, but it remains to be seen if their approach will change. Don’t hold your breath. In a striking phrase, Benedict is being touted as the “pope of the word of God.” With the bashing of fundamentalists, it appears to be another move to preempt them and keep from losing ground to those sad and despised souls who take the Bible literally.

    The other item is talk between the Catholics and a few Protestant groups on the mutual recognition of each side’s baptisms. The Catholics want to make it easier for others to convert. So says one article about the main benefit of the talks:

    For Catholic parish life, the accord would be advantageous in cases where someone baptized in the Reformed traditions wishes to enter full communion with the Catholic Church or wishes to marry a Catholic.

    The Catholic Church recently invited Anglican bishops over to their side, and facilitated that move. The impression is the Catholics are hungry for converts, and they’ll take them where and how they can get them.

     
  • Glenda Williams 7:45 am on October 12, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , ,   

    Five baptized at County Jail 

    “Sometimes you have to hit rock bottom before you can come back up,” is a statement my sister-in-law said about people on the wrong path in life. I have thought of that many times since being involved in jail ministry work.

    On Thursday evenings a team of men goes into the local county jail and studies with the inmates for an hour. Last Thursday morning my husband, Douglas, went to the jail and baptized five men who wanted to become Christians. We have baptized so many until the jail staff bought a large metal, oblong tub for us to use for baptisms.  

    After a person is baptized we make their picture and put it on the front page of our next bulletin. We consider it front-page news, just like an important article in the newspaper. The men in the jail like to have copies of the bulletin to share with family members and to keep for themselves. Recently one of the younger men mentioned he didn’t want his picture in the orange prison uniform put on the bulletin.  I couldn’t help but think that he was ashamed of the reminder that he broke the law and had to pay for it.  Yet, we know, his soul was as white as snow. Sin scars.

     
    • Mike Riley 7:57 am on October 12, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Glenda, we rejoice for those who committed their lives to the Lord, and we ask that He continue to bless the prison work that your husband and others are doing. May the Lord be glorified in their effort.

  • Richard Mansel 10:34 pm on July 13, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    So Offensive [Updated] 

    In my first year of preaching,  I baptized a young Black man and one of the White men in the congregation actually said to me, “Do you think he understood what he was doing? You know their brains don’t work like ours.” That man is now deceased. I sure hope he repented of his hideous racism before it was too late.

     
    • Mike Riley 12:05 am on July 14, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I’m afraid skin color doesn’t have anything to do with the intelligence of an individual. One of our elders has a different skin color to mine, but his intellect is far superior to many men that I have known.

  • Laura 7:01 am on July 8, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism   

    Baptism in Purcellville! 

    The saints in Purcellville rejoice at the birth of a new brother in Christ, last evening after Bible study. Jordan is the son of one of our deacons. He’s a fine young man from a fine family. :) :)

     
  • Richard Mansel 12:59 pm on June 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    Clapping Question 

    In accordance with my poll question on clapping, people keep saying that since baptism is not an act of worship, then clapping is acceptable.

    Does this answer satisfy you? Or, do you think there is still a reason why clapping cannot occur after baptism? My opinion is that I would rather not have clapping after a baptism. I think an Amen and joyful praise in song is much more spiritual and solemn than raucous clapping.

    It is my opinion that cheering and hooting is beneath the dignity of the moment. Someone says that since Baptism is a passive act, the Lord is doing the cleansing, not the person that is being clapped for. God deserves all the glory, not man.

    What is your view of clapping after a baptism?

     
    • John Henson 6:57 pm on June 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      In my opinion, if the baptism occurs during a worship service, then applause is inappropriate. Why would it be necessary to reward or show approval for someone completing their obedience in baptism? If it is, then would it also be appropriate to cheer during that person’s first Lord’s Supper? Why? As you said, there are more appropriate ways of rejoicing at these kinds of event.

    • Mike Riley 9:01 pm on June 19, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      When I think of applause, I immediately think of an action that is associated with a sports or entertainment event – not anything associated with the solemn assembly of the saints.

    • Dave Rogers 12:10 am on June 20, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      It’s interesting to note that about 90 % of the instances of clapping in the bible are in contexts of disapproval, rather than approval. Biblically, I guess you could make a case (of sorts) against hand-clapping in worship (or in the context of a baptism) on this basis, but most folks would probably discount it. I agree, I think that clapping in either setting casts those doing the clapping in the role of mere spectators, “voting with their hands,” rather than engaged participants.

    • Ron 4:32 pm on June 20, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Some have clapped and on other occasions, others have not. I have no strong opinion, though I am generally opposed to hand clapping for the same reason Mike is. However, if after a baptism some clap, I say nothing; it seems to stir the emotion of the ones doing this and they are not people that seek to cause a fuss.

      We address clapping in the context of a setting where, especially, young people gather to worship. The youth series has congregations that are quite progressive, and with those congregation we either do not participate or take advantage of the “ride home” and teach on the appropriateness of worship and reverence, not noise making for one’s personal satisfaction.

    • Stephen R. Bradd 9:17 pm on June 20, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      If baptism isn’t an act of worship, then I don’t know what worship is! When one humbly gives himself to Christ in obedience to the gospel message, that is worship–regardless of the day, time, or location! I know that doesn’t fit into our 5 “acts of worship” TRADITION, but I think the traditional understanding is wrong here. Will anyone argue that putting in a portion of one’s INCOME for the prior week is worship but giving one’s LIFE to God isn’t?

      Clapping would be acceptable for any act of worship (baptism, etc.) IF NT authority could be shown for it (Col. 3:17). Until we can establish the authority for such, however, we had better stick with what we know IS approved–saying “Amen” (I Cor. 14:16).

  • Richard Mansel 11:45 am on June 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, , , , ,   

    Blood and Water in Salvation 

    I think that an understanding on blood and water in salvation is key to understanding baptism and God’s plan of redemption. I have posted a series of yes/no questions to help guide the student through a the subject of water and blood in salvation.

     
    • Mike Riley 1:02 pm on June 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, great job of illustrating the need for both blood and water in salvation!

      • Richard Mansel 1:45 pm on June 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Thank you, Mike. I feel this study [of blood and water] does not receive the attention it deserves.

  • Richard Mansel 12:29 am on June 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, immersion, ,   

    Baptism in Water 

    Heard at a Gospel Meeting tonight: “Water is not baptism. Baptism is something that takes place in water” (Bob Gray).

     
    • Tonia Gaynor 1:21 am on June 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      That’s true! What about repentance? It’s turning away from sinful deeds and thoughts or anything that places you at a guilty distance from Christ. Right? Is it appropriate to repent in the midst of your spiritual struggle or once you have successfully overcome the issue. For example, I struggle with attending church service regularly. I know it is a sin to miss worship. Do I repent after every absence or do I wait until I am faithful in my service to repent for my past lukewarm state?

      • Richard Mansel 2:08 am on June 4, 2010 Permalink | Reply

        Tonia, thanks for reading our blog and for taking the time to comment. Repentance is a reversal of course. We hate our sin so much that we cannot live with them any more and we beg for forgiveness. We can repent every day, so we are pure before God (1 John 1:7).

        Attending worship is important because when we miss, we have chosen to do something else. In doing so, we have put secular things above Christ. Additionally, we need to be together as a spiritual family and to praise God in worship and learn in Bible study. We should WANT to attend every service of the Church, because of what it means and how it blesses us.

  • Glenda Williams 9:29 am on May 30, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: baptism, ,   

    Two baptisms this past week 

    Two more people were baptized this past week at Geneva, making a total of 25 thus far this year.  Several of our members are teaching faithfully every week, most in the jail, but let me tell you about our youngest man who teaches. He goes from door to door asking people if he can study with them. He doesn’t want to work a job, but rather just teach people the Bible.  Thankfully for now he has a grandmother who supports him and he lives with her.  He has almost finished his degree in Bible at Faulkner University, and wants to preach full time.  He uses the 3-lesson Open Bible study course and is having great success with it.  I wonder if he even knows how many he has taught and baptized this year.  This young man is 21 or 22, and single.  He baptizes people wherever he goes.  He baptizes late at night in the river below Geneva. He baptizes in the gulf when in Florida, and often times he calls and wants to use the church baptistry because he has someone ready to be baptized.  He is constantly studying with people by texting.  He thinks we should only talk about the Bible, and associate only with people who will talk about it with us. It seems every minute he is awake is either spent in teaching people the gospel or studying his Bible. 

    What am I doing? Washing and drying the baptismal garments and keeping them ready for the next one, or more, who needs them!

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,093 other followers

%d bloggers like this: