Tagged: preaching Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Ron Thomas 7:00 am on May 21, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , preaching,   

    A Demand That Was Too Much 

    As I was studying Luke 3 this week I reflected on the what the Scripture said with regard to what John preached. John the Baptist was a preacher who garnered the attention of the people as he preached in the wilderness (Luke 3:3; Matthew 3:5). John would not be “employed” by most churches today because the message he preached, while intriguing, was one that demanded too much.

    His message was three-fold. First, he was preparing the way for the coming Messiah. John’s preparation was accomplished in the preaching. The imagery of Luke 3:4-6 would not have been lost on the people, especially as he illustrated this in his exhortations to the people when they inquired (Luke 3:7-14). Second, he preached and demanded those who came to him reflect a life of repentance; this, however, was much easier said than accomplished. The word “repentance” means “a change of mind” with regard to the sinful way one lives life, and this change being reflected in a godly life lived. Third, he baptized (immersed) those who came to him “for [with a view to] the forgiveness of sins.”

    Baptism is not for infants and children who do not understand the difference between sins and righteousness. Baptism is for those who do understand; it is interesting to note that those baptized in the book of Acts are all identified as “men and women” (people who understand). More than the candidate for baptism is important here, however, it is the idea of repentance. Those who come to God need to change the way they live life if they would see Him who is Lord over all (cf. Luke 13:3-5). It is serious! RT

     
  • TFRStaff 5:30 am on May 21, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , preaching   

    Hugh’s News & Views (Good Minister) 

    Hugh’s news & Views

    WHAT MAKES A GOOD MINISTER?

    People have all sorts of notions as to what constitutes a good preacher/minister. Some want him to be a good speaker who delivers rich, in-depth sermons, and takes no more than fifteen minutes to do so. Others want someone who can attract and hold the attention of young people (especially the 18-30 crowd). Some want a minister who is trained in and skilled at counseling. Others look for a good administrator and manager. Most church members would like a minister who is good at hospital and nursing home visitation. Still others want a preacher who excels at one-on-one evangelism. Many church members think the preacher ought to be a good “mixer” (warm, friendly, outgoing, never meets a stranger, turns up for every event the church has). Some want the preacher to be a cheerleader and a PR man for the congregation.

    A few years ago someone facetiously wrote that after decades of searching the perfect preacher had been found. He is just exactly what every congregation wants. Here is the fascinating description of him.

    He preaches exactly 20 minutes and then sits down. He condemns sin, but never hurts anyone’s feelings. He works from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. in every type of work from preaching to custodial service. He makes $400 a week, wears good clothes, buys good books regularly, has a nice family, drives a good car, and gives $60 a week to the church. He also stands ready to contribute to every good cause that comes along.

    He is 26 years old and has been preaching for 30 years. He is short and tall, slender and heavy set, handsome, but not overly so. He has one brown eye and one blue eye; his hair is parted down the middle, left side dark and straight, right side brown and wavy.

    He has a burning desire to work with teenagers and spends all his time with the older folks.

    He smiles all the time with a straight face because he has a sense of humor that keeps him seriously dedicated to his work.

    He makes 15 calls a day on church members, spends all his time evangelizing the unchurched, and is never out of his office.

    Now, shall we get real about what makes a good minister? The apostle Paul wrote to the young preacher Timothy: “If you instruct the brethren in these things, you will be a good minister of Jesus Christ, nourished in the words of faith and of the good doctrine which you have carefully followed” (I Timothy 4:6). Did we hear what Paul said? “If you instruct the brethren in these things, you will be a good minister of Jesus Christ…” What were the things in which Timothy needed to instruct the brethren? Look at the preceding five verses (I Timothy 4:1-5). Among other things, a good preacher warns his hearers about spiritual dangers, about the fact that “some will depart from the faith” and fall prey to “deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons.” How important is this with reference to your expectations of a preacher? (More …)

     
  • Richard Mansel 7:33 pm on May 16, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , preaching   

    Six Things Young Preachers Need to Know 

    youngman

    When young men go into the ministry, they are ambitious and hopeful. They dream of saving countless souls and inspiring brethren immediately to become passionate and obedient.

    However, reality soon sets in, and they learn that working with humans is more complicated than they realized. These aspiring preachers learn some harsh lessons in the meantime and struggle until they gain some experience.

    When we embark into a new career, we need copious amounts of guidance, patience and grace until we know what we are doing. With that in mind, here are six lessons that young preachers may not be told in school or when they are in training.

    (More …)

     
    • Ron Thomas 7:49 pm on May 16, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      I am assuming, Richard, you have in mind “lessons learned and that should be known as a form of guidance” during hard times, and not really anything else concerning the work?

    • Ron Thomas 7:56 pm on May 16, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      With that in mind, I will offer a couple of thoughts. First, don’t contribute to the solution unless invited. Second, you don’t always know what needs to be done. When that is understood, then one is able to move slower and easier. These are two things I have learned through the years – among others.

    • Rick 8:01 pm on May 16, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      Great, practical article. I heard, just last week, one brother discouraging his son from attending a brotherhood “preaching school.” Said that the brethren from years gone by didn’t need it, and they don’t need it now (I did kindly point out the untruthfulness of that argument, btw). As a graduate of one of them, If preaching schools were good for only one thing (and they ubiquitously have positives and negatives), the experience and influence of seasoned preachers would be it. Congregations and preachers (especially young ones) have expectations, and it takes a while to figure out what those are, and if each party will be willing and/or able to meet them. It takes a tremendous amount of patience, forgiveness and humility to endure the relationship, which I view to be as near to marriage as any other relationship. Again, good thoughts, Richard; and Ron Thomas, nice meeting you a week ago :)

  • John T. Polk II 4:09 am on May 10, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , judgment in writing, , , , preaching,   

    Psalm 149 The God Who Will Not Be Conquered 

    These last 5 Psalms (146-150) are called “Hallelujah Psalms” because they begin and end with that expression: “Praise – Jehovah,” or “Hallelujah.” The author, date, and setting of each Psalm are undetermined, but their acceptance is unquestioned.

    Verses 1-5 call for God’s People to praise Him for victory;

    Verses 6-9 call for praise and defeat of their enemies.

    Verses 1-5: (Verse 1) “A new song” indicates a “new heart,” celebrating a “new victory,” and a “new life.” “The assembly of the saints” is a worship service, where “God is greatly to be feared” (Psalm 89:7). In America, every time there is disaster, trouble, destruction, criminal death, or missing person, there is some candlelight “coming together.” When Peter was kept in prison with the intent of killing him, the church of Christ gathered for prayer (Acts 12:12), not candles! (Verse 2) The people, Israel, especially their religious center, Zion, should rejoice with (verse 3) “dance” and “timbrel and harp,” just as their forefathers had done when God parted the Red Sea for them to escape Egypt and be their own Nation (Exodus 14:21-15:21). (Verse 4) God’s “pleasure” is in His People, who develop beautiful, spiritual character. (Verse 5) “Saints” should be joyful, even on “their beds,” formerly places of sorrow.

    Verses 6-9: (Verse 6) While praising God with their “mouth,” “And a two-edged sword in their hand.” This sounds like the Israelites re-building the wall of Jerusalem when they were returned to their Promised Land (Nehemiah 4:17). Apparently, there was no “gun control” then! A dis-armed people can do nothing against the enemies of God! (Verse 7) “Bearing the sword” in “vain” (meaninglessly), or using the power of the sword against “good works,” violates God’s intended purpose for “governing authorities” (Romans 13:1-5). Today, Christians are to praise God while Government uses the sword to be “God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil” (Romans 13:4).

    (Verse 8) God’s government, acting as His minister, defeats evil. (Verse 9) God’s “judgment” in writing was: “When the LORD your God brings you into the land which you go to possess, and has cast out many nations before you, the Hittites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than you, and when the LORD your God delivers them over to you, you shall conquer them and utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them nor show mercy to them” (Deuteronomy 7:1-2). Today, the “sword of the Spirit” in a Christian hand, “is the word of God” (Ephesians 6:17), and the “nations,” “peoples,” “kings,” and “nobles” must be conquered by teaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ (Matthew 28:18-20). Since Jesus Christ established His spiritual kingdom on Earth in the 1st Century, there has been NO “Christian carnal war” waged against Muslims, Jews, or anyone else, for that matter, and therefore NO justification for persecuting the churches of Christ! All of those who persecute Christians, even to death, are persecuting Jesus (Acts 9:1-5), and, unless they repent, He will damn them forever (2 Thessalonians 1:3-10)!

    “Praise the LORD!”

     All Scriptures and comments are based upon the New King James Version, unless otherwise noted.

     
  • Ron Thomas 7:00 am on April 15, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , mission of church, , preaching   

    The Poor Always 

    It has been said time and again that the mission of the church is three-fold: the proclamation of the gospel (Luke 19:10), the edification of the saints (2 Timothy 2:2), and benevolence (Galatians 6:10). I would like to develop in brief these three points.

    The church consists of only those who are saved by the blood of Christ (Acts 20:28); there are no unsaved people in the Lord’s church (2 Timothy 2:19). When one embraces salvation there is a change in life that is really remarkable. The saved one wants to assist in the Lord’s cause in any way that there is opportunity, and one of the best ways is in living and sharing the gospel of Christ. If all Christians did as much, the first mission statement of the church would continue to be fulfilled with each generation.

    Second, as one lives the life of Christ there will always be opportunities to share the gospel of Christ with the unsaved. Some of those who are not saved are attending the Bible classes. Our Bible classes are an important work of the church. In the Bible class the prepared teacher has taken time to not only learn from the Lord, but also desires to teach those present the same things the teacher has learned. It is a disservice to the Lord, to the teacher, to the parent, and to the child (children) when there is little interest or support for the work.

    Third, James said that pure and undefiled religions is to assist those who are in need (James 1:27). There will always be people who are poor in our community. Those who are in the Lord’s church have a special obligation to render assistance to Christians in need (not want). When the elders fail to take an active role in that they not only fail the one (or ones) in need, but the Lord also!

    The Lord’s church has an obligation in the community in which it resides and to the saints. Let us do what we can to promote the Lord’s way in this regard. RT

     
    • John Henson 10:47 am on April 15, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      You are so right, brother. It is interesting the books of Isaiah and Jeremiah have statements from God accusing Judah of forgetting the widow, the orphan and the poor while they built and enjoyed their wealth. It makes sense that God remains concerned and we should, too. Thanks for the lesson.

  • TFRStaff 6:10 am on April 9, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: basic Bible texts, , preaching   

    Hugh’s News & Views (Anchor Texts) 

    hugh’s news & Views

    ANCHOR TEXTS

    This year marks the 60th year in which I have endeavored to preach the gospel of Christ. I made my first feeble, fumbling efforts as a fifteen year old, speaking on a fill-in basis in small rural churches in northwest Florida and later in northwest Alabama.

    By the time I was a senior in high school I was preaching every Sunday for a rural congregation near Florence, Alabama. In those early days, by the very nature of the case, I was concerned with setting forth only the most elementary truths of God’s word. I had no learning or ability to do otherwise.

    But as I grew and matured in the faith and in my knowledge of the Scriptures, I began to realize that there were certain “anchor texts” that stood behind, informed, gave meaning to, and stabilized everything I endeavored (both then and now) to preach texts that I strove (either consciously or subconsciously) to keep in mind as I presented the word of God.

    Through the years I have become even more aware of the importance of these “anchor texts.” As a sequel to last week’s essay on “What I Love About Preaching” I would like to set forth some of these anchor texts. I shall do so with a minimum of comment about any of them since their significance should be evident to all.

    “And I, brethren, when I came to you, did not come with excellence of speech or of wisdom declaring to you the testimony of God. For I determined not to know anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified” (I Corinthians 2:1-2).

    “For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He was seen by Cephas (Simon Peter, hf), then by the twelve” (I Corinthians 15:3-5). [Note: Preachers should not stop with verse 4, but also emphasize verse 5 (as well as the succeeding verses) and the fact that there were credible witnesses to the resurrection of Christ.]

    “For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes, for the Jew first and also for the Greek” (Romans 1:16).

    “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work” (II Timothy 3:16-17). [Note: The faithful
    preacher of Christ recognizes the divine inspiration, authority, and all-sufficiency of the Scriptures. He has no need for the catechisms, creed books, and church manuals of
    men, or for the speculative theories and opinions of men; neither do his hearers. Stay with and preach the all-sufficient Book of God!] (More …)

     
  • TFRStaff 7:26 am on April 6, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , preaching,   

    Woe Is Me 

    The title refers to a phrase not heard much in these modern days. It means “grievous distress, affliction, or trouble”. It can also be used as “an affliction” or as “an exclamation of grief, distress, or lamentation”. People would say “woe is me” when they were in the midst of trouble and despair.

    In the Bible woe is used most often of a pronouncement of grievous distress, affliction, or trouble: “Woe unto the wicked! it shall be ill with him: for the reward of his hands shall be given him” (Isaiah 3:11).

    Woe is generally used by a person to exclaim their distress or trouble because of something bad that has happened. However the apostle Paul used it as a pronouncement of trouble if he did not do something. “For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel!” (1 Corinthians 9:16)

    Many a bad thing had happened to Paul (2 Cor. 11:23-27) yet woe was declared upon himself if he failed to preach to gospel of Christ. Would it be any different for us?

    In Christ, Steve Preston

    Sign up for BibleTalk, short messages from

    God’s word, by sending an email to

    bibletalk-subscribe

    or on the web at

    http://www.freegroups.net/groups/bibletalk.

     
  • TFRStaff 5:14 am on April 2, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , preaching   

    Hugh’s News & Views (Preaching) 

    hugh’s news & Views

    WHAT I LOVE ABOUT PREACHING

    Recently, I was asked by a younger preacher who was doing a survey among preachers of all ages what I love about preaching. Here is the response I made to him.

    1. Seeing a soul respond to the message of the cross to obey the gospel and become a child of God.

    2. Seeing a soul respond to the word of God to acknowledge that he/she has been away from the Lord and wants to repent and come home.

    3. Reading, studying, and preparing sermons/lessons that hopefully will inform, inspire, and encourage the hearers.

    4. Having someone say to me, “I never had thought of that,” or, “I’ve read that passage many times and never noticed that.” (Not long ago a long-time member of the church and excellent song leader told me following my lesson during the Bible school hour that he had never noticed that the word in Matthew 7:13-14 (KJV) is “strait,” not “straight.” I had pointed that out during the course of the lesson.)

    5. The joy of seeing the “light come on”that “aha” momentwhen a person finally sees the reality and beauty of undenominational Christianity; when one sees that the Lord’s church is not a denomination originating with men and that one can be a member of it today; when one sees that it is possible to be just a Christian without being a member of any denomination; when one sees that baptism is not a work of human merit but an integral part of saving faith and a prerequisite to receiving the remission of sins (Acts 2:38).

    6. Being able to bring God’s peace and comfort to souls who are hurting because of sickness and death, heartaches and disappointments, family problems, etc.

    7. Seeing a young man, or even an older man, grow and develop spiritually and telling me, “I want to be a preacher of the gospel.”

    8. Returning to places where I have formerly lived and seeing the congregation thriving spiritually, at peace, and those who were young when I lived there now serving as elders, deacons, teachers, etc.

    9. Enjoying the friendship and fellowship of the “preacherhood”having the confidence of my brethren and my long-time preacher friends, and rejoicing in their accomplishments.

    10. Knowing that when I preach God’s word faithfully, in love, yet with conviction, it will not return void but will accomplish its purpose.

    The above things are on my list of what I love about preaching because I want to save both myself and those who hear me. (I Timothy 4:16).

    The late Paul Rogers who preached for the Lord’s church in Centerville, Tennessee for almost 50 years was fond of saying, “God only had one Son, and He was a preacher!” And so He was! And so am I!

    Speaking Schedule:

    April 4: MemphisSchool of Preaching Lectures, Memphis, TN

    April 14-18: LibertyChurch of Christ, DeFuniak Springs, FL

    Hugh Fulford

    April 2, 2013

     
  • Chad Dollahite 2:22 pm on February 18, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , preaching,   

    Yesterday’s Sermons 

    marriagePer Randall’s request, here is my cartoon…can you guess what yesterday’s sermons were about?  It was all actually one sermon that was a bit long, so I started it Sunday morning and finished it in the evening.

    .

    .

    .

    The “so what” of the sermon was that marriage need not be “okay” or “tolerable,” but marriage can be a little taste of heaven here on earth.  And, since the church is the bride of Christ (Eph. 5:21-32), there’s an application there for all, whether married or single.

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 6:11 am on February 17, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , preaching,   

    Preachers, teachers: Post your sermons, lessons (and a cartoon) 

    We invite preachers (and Bible school teachers too, why not?) to post a synopsis of your lessons today. Please share the main idea, the “so what?” of your lesson(s) especially. You can do this in the comments, or email us and we’ll give the lesson its own post.

    TFR Fellows, of course, are expected to make their own posts.

    To encourage you, this little cartoon:

    sermons-sleep

    Some encouragement, right?!

     
    • mtmcvb 6:26 am on February 17, 2013 Permalink | Reply

      Lord’s Supper lesson will focus on 1 Cor. 11:24,25 and the word remembrance. A seldom used word in the greek testament. Also used in Hebrews 10:3. Under the OT remembrance was primarily of guilt and sin. Under the NT remembrance is primarily of Christ and his sacrifice to take away our guilt and sins. Some commentators say that while the greek word may be used as a synonym for other words translated remember, this one has an inference that the remembrance comes from within the individual rather than being instigated from without. This seems to go along with 1 Cor. 11:26 — we proclaim his death with our participation of his memorial. We actively proclaim our joy and thanksgiving.

  • John T. Polk II 10:38 am on February 12, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , dogma, epistle, , preaching, , , Vatican,   

    Where Was “Vatican Smoke” In The New Testament Church?. 

    Please read Acts 15:1-31, then read the following:

    1. There was NO appeal to Peter, but to “apostles, elders” and the “whole church” gathered to hear Acts 15:2, 4, 6, 12 (“all the multitude”), 22

    2. EVERY speaker proclaimed only the Word of God (Oral & Written):

        (1) Acts 15:2-4:  Paul and Barnabas proclaimed what God had been doing among Gentiles (before Acts 13-14 had been written);

        (2) Acts 15:5-11: Peter reminded them of the events of Acts 10-11 in selecting Gentiles to be saved (before it had been written down);

        (3) Acts 15:12-21: James preached God’s Prophecy about the goal of bringing in Gentiles, quoting Amos 9:11-12, THEN gave HIS “judgment”;

        (4) Acts 15:22:  THE CONCLUSION WAS INSPIRED ENTIRELY BY GOD’S WORD (A.K.A. “SCRIPTURE”), AND IT WAS UNANIMOUS – LIKE NO Roman Catholic Church COUNCIL!!!!

    3. The letter sent to the Gentiles with this Apostolic preaching (Acts 15:23-31) was an Apostolic “letter” (Greek: epistole). When copies are actually distributed to the Christians of a Gentile background (Acts 16:4), they are termed “decrees” (Greek: dogmata): The “DOGMA” was necessary and delivered immediately to the Gentiles!!!!  Refer to Acts 15:1-16:5 and notice that:

    (1) The church didn’t wait hundreds of years to know “dogma.”

    (2) This was an epistle of Scripture from the Apostles, and NOT from a Roman Catholic Church “Magisterium,” or “Vatican Council,” or “College of the Cardinals,” or announced by “smoke!” When Peter and the REAL Apostles of Jesus Christ taught and wrote Scripture, it was in writing that WAS “Scripture,” based upon Scripture, NOT the result of political “in-fighting” and out-maneuvering ,as is continually practiced by the Roman Catholic Church. People who “blow smoke” are NOT Apostles of Jesus Christ!

    (3) “So the churches were strengthened in the faith, and increased in number daily” Acts 16:5. The churches of Christ are always strengthened by Scripture and always apostatize when following human commandments (1 Timothy 4:1-5; 2 Timothy 4:1-5). Wrong attitudes always produce and defend wrong doctrines(1 Timothy 6:3-5)!

    4. THERE WAS NO VOTE TAKEN, NOR SUCCESSIVE SESSIONS OF THIS COUNCIL!

    5. There was NO: supremacy of Peter, voting on doctrine; waiting hundreds of years to deal with controversy; multiple sessions to arrive at a conclusion; opposition to the views expressed; PRESENTATION OF ANY OUTSIDE “TRADITION;” “COMMENTARIES;” OR PREVIOUS “COUNCIL” CONCLUSIONS; BUT ONLY SCRIPTURE (BOTH WRITTEN & UNWRITTEN)!

    6. This was the ONLY council gathering like it in Scripture.

        (1) The gathering to replace Judas Iscariot (Acts 1:13-26) did nothing to replace James the brother of John
    when Herod killed him (Acts 12:1-2);

        (2) The gathering to disprove Jewish heretics sent Gentiles their “dogma” (Acts 15:1-31) and never met again!

    —–John T. Polk II

     
  • J. Randal Matheny 9:59 am on January 25, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching, pulpit   

    Facing the congregation 

    1st-church-of-the-signhold1

     
  • Glenda Williams 10:43 pm on January 19, 2013 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching,   

    I guess I come from the old school, but age and experience has given me the motivation to share my concern about the way many present day preachers are dressing in the pulpit.

    From time to time, and more often than I like to admit, I see preachers in front of a beautiful background, or in a lovely church building, dressed in a polo shirt, or with an open necked shirt with no tie, or coat, and I can’t help it, I don’t like it. They stand with Bible in hand preaching the word of God. Just recently I saw this handsome young man preaching in a short-sleeved, faded, red striped, polo shirt in front of a beautiful background, and somehow it just didn’t look like it fit to me. I couldn’t hear what he was saying because I was too shocked at what he was wearing. “Oh,” you say, “That might have been all he had to wear.” Not so! I have seen him on other occasions and even called an elder of a nearby church and recommended him as a possible located preacher for them.

    Is there something wrong with me? I might have thought so, but then I thought about such TV personalities as David Letterman, Jay Leno, Jimmie Fallon and some of the others (who I don’t watch, by the way, but only see in passing). Why do you suppose they wear suits and ties to do their monologues? Haven’t they discovered, as we in the church seem to feel we have, that they have to dress down so that others would feel more comfortable watching their program and listening to what they have to say? Do I think for a minute they would come out to do their monologue in front of millions of people on television, and those in their studio audience, dressed like some of our preachers today? No, I don’t think they would, and I think if they did their ratings would go down tremendously.

    Now granted, God isn’t looking on the dress as much as the heart of a person. I get that. But doesn’t God deserve the best we have to give, the best we have to wear? I think this relaxed dress is not fitting attire in the pulpits of our Lord in the richest country on earth. I think when preachers become so lackadaisical in their dress, they may lose the respect of those listening to what they are saying. Also, I dare say any preacher would attend a funeral wearing every day clothing.

    Could it be that this is another example of the church conforming to the world’s standards and not desiring to give our best in every area of our lives to God?

    “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God (Romans 12:1-2).

     
  • John T. Polk II 4:12 am on December 26, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , preaching, , troubled faith, wicked prosperity   

    Psalm 73 

    Vs. 1 states the conviction of believers that blessings have come from God;

    Vs. 2-14 state the difficulty for the believer when the wicked are blessed;

    Vs. 15-22 resolve the troubling conflict in faith;

    Vs. 23-28 show renewed confidence in the Lord God.

    Asaph was “the seer” (prophet), and with David’s words (2 Chronicles 29:30), wrote 12 Psalms (50, 73-83). When Israel was restored to their land, they were reminded of these Psalms (Nehemiah 12:46). A major stumbling-block for believers is: “Why to the wicked prosper?” This Psalm answers that question. Please re-read my study of Psalm 37.

    Verse 1: The only other time this expression (“pure in heart”) is used is by Jesus (Matthew 5:8), and to “see God” (Hebrews 12:14) is to be aware of His “good” that He does (Ephesians 1:17-18).

    Verses 2-14: It is a slippery slope for a believer to “envy” the “prosperity of the wicked (verses 2-3). David covered this subject (Psalm 37:1-6), Solomon echoed it (Proverbs 23:17), and Paul damned it (Galatians 5:19-21). But it appears the wicked have it easy, even in death (verse 4; Job 21:7, 13). Obviously the believer is incorrect at overlooking all the wicked who die horrible deaths (Jezebel, King Saul, Absalom, Ahithophel, Hitler, Mussolini, ad nauseum). The worldly-minded are always looking out for themselves (verse 5; Luke 16:8), while the righteous are trying to love God and man (Mark 12:29-31). Believers must take a look at the dark side of the wicked’s life: “pride” and “violence” (verse 6); covetousness (verse 7); their perverse language (verses 8-9) cannot be trusted. In the words of Edward Parry: “Their tongue walketh through the earth, and leaves nothing unspoken of.  If men be poor, they talk of oppressing and mastering of them; if they oppose, they discourse of violence and suppressing… If in this perambulation they meet with truth, they darken it with lies and home made inventions; if with innocence, they brand it with false accusations and bitter aspersions; if with a strict government and good laws, then they cry, ‘Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us;’ if with religion, they term it heresy, or superstition; if with patience, they term it obstinacy and perverseness; if with the church, they think of nothing less than devouring it, and cry, ‘Let us take the houses of God in possession;’ if with the thoughts of a resurrection, and of future hopes, ‘Let us eat and drink,’ cry they, ‘for tomorrow we shall die.’  Thus no corner is left unsearched by their abusive tongue, which walks through the earth.” Even the ungodly are emboldened by this one-sided thinking, for they: drink his cup of sins (verse 10); falsely assume that God doesn’t know of their sins (verse 11); seem to have it easy and are rich (verse 12). Meanwhile, the righteous begin thinking, “Why am I knocking myself out to be right?” (verse 13), and “Why do I question the right-ness of everything I do?” (verse 14).

    Verses 15-22: If the believer voiced these doubts, it could undermine the faith of others (verse 15), because just the thought of it is “too painful” for one (verse 16). The answer is found by going to church (verse 17)! When Moses built the tabernacle, God said, “And let them make Me a sanctuary, that I may dwell among them” (Exodus 25:8). That “sanctuary” then was the gathering place for God’s People to worship God. Today, the temple of God is the church of Christ (2 Corinthians 1:1; 6:16), which no church building actually is (Hebrews 8:2)! Since “church” means “assembly,” THEN CHRISTIANS WHO ASSEMBLE TO HEAR BIBLE PREACHING WILL BE TAUGHT THE ANSWER TO THIS MOST TROUBLING QUESTION! Bible lessons include the destruction of the wicked (verses 18-20), and the foolishness and ignorance of believers who forget these lessons (verses 21-22)!

    Verses 23-28: The believer must resolve to be led by faith (verse 23) and saved by God (verse 24). Faith revolves around these truths: (1) God is faithful in Heaven (verse 25; 2 Corinthians 1:18); (2) we must be faithful on earth (verse 26; 2 Timothy 2:11-13);  (3) God destroys those who “desert” Him (verse 27; Proverbs 13:9; Matthew 7:21-23); (4) our lives are best when we “draw near to God” (verse 28; James 4:7-8).

    All Scriptures and comments are based upon the New King James Version, unless otherwise noted.

     
  • John T. Polk II 1:10 am on December 18, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , massacre, preaching, ,   

    Why Sandy Hook? 

    On Friday, December 14, 2012, in Newtown, Connecticut, a 20-year-old gunman massacred 20 Sandy Hook Elementary Students, 5 Faculty members, his mother, and then himself. Too late, he took himself out of our misery. The inevitable question is: WHY?

    (1) Former Mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani, the next day on Fox TV News noted the answer is “complex,” involving medical, psychological, mental, sociological factors, and anyone who had a simple answer could not be right. (2) Politicians and their Propaganda Press, began their tyrannical mantra of, “all guns must be outlawed.” (3) Even before the precious bodies began to be buried, President Obama did not let this crisis go to waste, and on Sunday opened his address to that stunned community gathering with a Scripture quotation:

     A) “Thank you. Thank you, governor. To all the families, first responders, to the community of Newtown, clergy, guests: Scripture tells us: “…do not lose heart. Though outwardly we are wasting away…inwardly we are being renewed day by day. For our light and momentary troubles are achieving for us an eternal glory that far outweighs them all. So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal. For we know that if the earthly tent we live in is destroyed, we have a building from God, an eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands.”

    He also used the occasion to advance his political agenda:

    B) “In the coming weeks, I’ll use whatever power this office holds to engage my fellow citizens — from law enforcement to mental health professionals to parents and educators — in an effort aimed at preventing more tragedies like this,” Obama said. “Because what choice do we have? We can’t accept events like this as routine. Are we really prepared to say that we’re powerless in the face of such carnage? That the politics are too hard?”

     A response to their remarks follows.

    (1) Mayor Giuliani’s comment shows abysmal ignorance of the Word of God. God created humans and knows everything about us; the Bible is the gradual unfolding of the revelation of God and what He provides in our best interest; Jesus Christ is the only personification of perfection in a human being. God condemned the first murderer, Cain, who killed his brother Abel. “Why?” is answered in 1 John 3:11-12: “For this is the message that you heard from the beginning, that we should love one another, not as Cain who was of the wicked one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his works were evil and his brother’s righteous.” In the entire history of mankind, those who choose to do evil obey the Devil, of whom Jesus Christ said, “”Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word. You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it” (John 8:43-44). The simple solution to all evil is that, for whatever reasons, evil is chosen and the Devil obeyed. Jesus Christ is available for everyone who repents and is baptized in His name for the remission of sins (Acts 2:38).

    (2) The Propaganda Press drive a political agenda by reciting its current mantra, without investigating and reporting only the facts. Any horrific crime where a gun is used, “the gun must be outlawed.” Almost every school shooter has been a boy from a broken home. God planned that every child born should have two parents: a male and a female (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:4-6; Colossians 3:18-21). A Government which sanctions divorce for every cause, “legalizes” homosexual “marriages,” and provides welfare for single parents has virtually destroyed the will and need for the home as God would have it. For every “single mother” there is a delinquent dad. But the Propaganda Press completely ignores this fact because they headline their “party line.”

     (3) A) The Scripture the President quoted is 2 Corinthians 4:16-5:1, and it comforts in that it emphasizes that the stresses and pains we encounter in this life should not keep us from achieving the greater goal of “an eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands.”

    However the President of the United States of America, standing before the American Flag and behind the Presidential Seal, in a public school facility, and in his official capacity representing the Executive Branch of the Government, quoted Scripture??? What happened to the “separation of church and state” arguments? The President proved by his quotation that there is NO “Law of the Land” that separates “church and state,” therefore THERE IS NO LEGAL PROHIBITION FOR PREACHING SCRIPTURE, PRAYING, OR OTHER RELIGIOUS PRACTICES IN PUBLIC ASSEMBLIES!!! Since he disregarded all supposed claims that separate church from state, WHY CAN’T ALL CHRISTIANS DO THE SAME?

    The President’s quotation was written by an “Apostle of Jesus Christ” and to those whose “sufferings” and “consolation” are connected with Jesus Christ (2 Corinthians 1:1, 5). Was the President being insensitive to other religious groups? Were there no Jews, Muslims, or Atheists present to object to Christian Scripture, or the concepts of “inner man,” or “eternal?” One parent’s objection has been all it has taken to stop such references throughout the rest of the country. Since the President of the United States of America can preach from Scripture written in the name of Jesus Christ in complete disregard for minority objections, THEN WHY CAN’T ALL CHRISTIANS? Those who do not accept the beliefs of the group should simply absent themselves from that group assembly.

    That the President would quote Scripture to show concern for these dead children makes one wonder why he doesn’t quote other Scriptures for the living children?

    -Has he not read about the Egyptian king who “dealt treacherously” by having babies killed as they were born (Acts 7:17-19)?

    -Has he not read how God described how His sparing Jerusalem was like saving a newborn baby that had been “loathed on the day” it was born and thrown to the ground that it might die (Ezekiel 16:1-6)?

    -Has he not read that God’s Prophet, Elisha, wept foreseeing a king’s “evil” who “will dash their children, and rip open their women with child” (2 Kings 8:12)?

    -When abortion murders millions of babies who, though conceived, were “not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil” (Romans 9:10-11), what is the President doing to prevent “more tragedies like this?”

    If the President only quoted Scripture for a political photo-op, then, we must conclude he uses God’s Word to cover selfish ambition, and is “handling the word of God deceitfully” (2 Corinthians 4:2). If, however, he believes in God, the Bible, and Jesus Christ, then we must conclude that he’ll “use whatever power this office holds to engage my fellow citizens — from law enforcement to mental health professionals to parents and educators — in an effort aimed at preventing more tragedies like this” by Executive Order, thus remove all laws and rulings that presently “suppress the truth in unrighteousness” (Romans 1:18).

    (3) B) The President said, “We can’t accept events like this as routine. Are we really prepared to say that we’re powerless in the face of such carnage? That the politics are too hard?”

    -Then how can he accept “as routine” abortion clinics, Planned Parenthood, or The Supreme Court’s ruling that approve the genocide of abortion?

    -Then how can he accept “as routine” thousands of American military service personnel who continually die in foreign countries?

    -Then how can he accept “as routine” Federal policies that hamper public education (and protection!) of our precious children, that take it out of local, loving hands?

    There is no answer or preventative to be found in the institutions of men who “only fix our eyes on what is seen,” and refuse to see the solution offered by the God who cannot be seen about that which we cannot see. Only God, the Bible, and Jesus Christ can prevent more sin.

              —–John T. Polk II

     
  • Richard Mansel 6:11 pm on December 3, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , preaching,   

    What is Prayer? 

    prayer-hands778

    In 2013, my preaching emphasis will be on helping the congregation grow in prayer. My prayer is that this will promote spiritual and numerical growth. I plan to preach two sermons a month and try to keep the necessity of prayer before the congregation by emphasizing it in the bulletin.

    I will be deciding over the next few weeks which sermons to preach but I wanted to get your feedback.

    • How do you define prayer?
    • What does prayer mean to you in a personal way?
    • How would a greater emphasis on prayer change you spiritually?

    I look forward to your answers!

     

     
    • preachercarter 2:04 pm on December 4, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Prayer is nothing more than communication with God. it is often intimate yet always requires utmost respect of His Majesty. With this we learn more of Him and grow all the more.

      http://thechristianperspective.intuitwebsites.com/

    • Eugene Adkins 5:43 pm on December 4, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Definition: A plea/request spoken with words of hope (and desire) of being heard and answered. Also an expression from the heart based upon gratitude, honor, sadness, joy etc. that seeks to be closer to God.

      Personal meaning: A measure of awareness of God working in and with my life, and an expressed measure of dependance upon God’s will for my life.

      Change: More self-awareness (forgiving others when asking for forgiveness, how my life aligns with God’s will – 1 John 5:13-15) and and awareness of the needs of others, etc.. A better acknowledgment of blessings both “great” and “small.”

  • Ron Thomas 8:00 am on November 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    The Work and Craft of Preaching 

    Conclusion

    The preacher in society is looked upon in a particular way, but no matter how he is looked at, he is God’s servant, and it is to the Lord that he must seek approval. It is a tall task, but one well worth the time and labor to engage in. if one loses sight of what is important, then preaching will be seen and experienced much differently than that which God has laid out. There is nothing easy about being a preacher, but the hard task of preaching and being a preacher is made easier when the focus is properly placed. Those who think the preacher does not work but three-four hours a week are the same people who would fail miserably as being a preacher. A large percentage of the people with which I have contact try to understand the work and load that is carried by a preacher, but unless you are one, there is no real understanding that a non-preacher can have. Nevertheless, those who do try to understand, they are greatly appreciated.

    Preaching, to me, is not work, it is my life. I don’t look upon “going to the office” in any negative way. In fact, I enjoy it immensely. My office is my “sanctuary”; it is a place where I am with God, listening to God, talking with God. It is a place where I am challenged, where I can reflect – and write essays!

     

     
  • Ron Thomas 8:00 am on November 29, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    The Work and Craft of Preaching 

    Essay 6

    In the introduction to this series of essays I mention the books by Tom Holland (TH); I have come to think that any man who would like to be a preacher should get any and all books by Tom on the subject. Tom Holland, to my way of thinking, is a master preacher. He preaching is exceptional, but it is the compliment of his life in personal interaction with someone like me (a peon, I consider myself) that makes him as a man and his preaching all the better. Of course, in saying this, one ought not to think that Tom does not have his own baggage problems. If you have yours, then you can surely understand that he has his. Having listened to TH at CBI for the last number of years I have come to see TH much differently than simply reading his books.

    TH is not the only man to have influenced me with regard to the craft of preaching; the other is David Pharr. David’s outlines were in brief and had a different layout than Tom’s, but just as substantive. David was a teacher of mine at ETSOP; I had him for a number of classes, one being Homiletics II. He was tough, but his toughness helped me a good deal – though I surely did not think so at the time. Because of these two men and because of what I do I have taken more of an interest in the craft of preaching. What is the craft of preaching? I simply mean the art (or work) of putting together an outline in order to communicate it to the congregation.

    Because I read the Bible as I do I have been fortunate to have much to draw from in my memory. Not only a passage will come to mind, but the context of that passage also. This has cut down on the amount of time I have had to use in research; I am generally able to go right to it and look over the context and have it come quickly to mind.

    When I break down a passage, I focus on what is being said and the points that buttress what is said. From there I bring in complimentary passages and thoughts that are generated from the various passages. It is crucial to keep all passages in their proper context; if one extrapolates a thought from a passage, let that be known. Preaching audibly is one-sided; thus, I break down a passage to such a degree that the one who hears can understand. However, no matter how hard I try, it is always the case that in some regard I have failed. Perhaps I failed because I did not do as well as I thought I did; perhaps I failed because I chose poor words with which to communicate; perhaps failing was on the part of the hearer. No matter, when I learn there was a failure I seek to try to alleviate the misunderstanding. Some don’t give me the opportunity; they just walk out pouting!

     

     
  • Ron Thomas 8:00 am on November 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    The Work and Craft of Preaching 

    Essay 5

    What should a preacher do? In brief, here are some of my ideas about the work of a preacher. To begin, he must do as the Lord explicitly said in His holy word. Thus, he must be a man of the Book. In my view, God’s preacher needs to read incessantly God’s holy book. For me, I spend three to four hours a day reading God’s book and taking notes. Some years ago I heard Robert Taylor mention that he reads the New Testament once every month; that is nine chapters a day. Since that time I have made it mine habit also. There are many days where I will get as many as twenty chapters per day read, others days I am fortunate to get five. I also want to read the Old Testament each day; thus, I made myself a schedule of eight chapters a day. This takes time – at least for me. Unfortunately, I have not met that schedule’s demand of the Old Testament of late. I am fortunate to get three. Strangely enough, I feels as if I am dirty when then occurs; I hate it! All of this buttresses the idea of the preacher being a man of the book.

    A second thing under the umbrella of a preacher’s work is sermon preparation. How much time do you think a preacher ought to take to prepare sermons? Do you think it should be one hour for each minute in the pulpit? If a preacher takes thirty minutes to preach one sermon and he preaches two on Sunday – that is sixty hours! Perhaps you think he needs no particular preparation because God’s Spirit will move him to preach. Those who have come to accept this notion of preparation are confused in other areas of biblical understanding as well! The time it takes for a preacher to prepare sermons is strictly a matter of judgment. Whatever time it takes, he must prepare his sermons for the benefit of the congregation where he is preaching. His sermons must be heavy on Bible expositions and application in order to help the saints understand and live life better in God’s direction today than one did yesterday.

    A third work of the preacher, in my view, is that he must be a Barnabas. People need encouragement, and a preacher is in good position to be an encourager. Admittedly, there are some brethren that preachers would just as soon not have to interact with even on the level of eye contact. That’s not a possibility, however. Each person addresses life differently. For some, life’s pressures are converging and the pressure can be almost too much to bear. Encouragement for anyone can be helpful, but it may be especially helpful from the preacher. For some, life’s pressures are not all that oppressive, but even these people can use encouragement from time to time. When Jesus said to His apostles that He is the way, the truth, and the life, do you think those were encouraging words? I do.

    A fourth work of a preacher is as a counselor. Counseling is like walking on ice; it is an area that is treacherous even at its thickest point. Treacherous though it may be, it is inevitable that the preacher will be approached for some guidance. When I am approached I will always say at some point in the visit that I can help them understand what the Bible says. I am not a trained counselor, and I am not particularly interested in becoming one more than the Lord has already given in His word and trained me (2 Peter 1:3). A preacher, though, can be of great use when one comes to him for guidance. He has opportunity to help them understand the Lord’s will, or to make better application of the Lord’s word that they already understand. The point for the preacher is to direct those in need of help to the Lord.

     

     
  • Ron Thomas 8:00 am on November 27, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    The Work and Craft of Preaching 

    Essay 4

    The work of a preacher is much clearer, it appears, in the mind of society than it is in the minds of those who are actually doing the preaching. Many preachers, unfortunately, have adopted society’s standard for the preacher, and what the Lord said will be worked in when one can! In the community there is an expectation of the preacher that is both reasonable and unreasonable. That which is reasonable would be that which pertains to any and all Christians. The preacher is loving, compassionate, knowledgeable, giving, firm, and godly.

    Unreasonable expectations are along the line of blessing babies, blessing houses that are soon to be occupied, and some other things of this sort. There are also some unreasonable expectations associated with the fact the preacher is a man full of weaknesses, perhaps even more so than those who are in judgment of him. He is a man with his own baggage; he is trying to deal with his baggage like others are trying to deal with theirs. It may be reasonable to think the preacher dealing with his baggage is further along than the rest, but this is not always the case (though it should be). Each person deals with his baggage differently (cf. 1 Kings 8:38). Some baggage departments are larger than others.

    Who should preach, then?

    • A man should not be a preacher unless he has sanctified the Lord God in his heart and is prepared to give a reason for the hope that is in him – at the very least this should be the case (1 Peter 3:15).
    • A man should not be a preacher if he has not taken time to know the Lord intimately in prayer and in learning His sacred word. If he knows not the latter, what does he have to say?
    • A man should not be a preacher if he knows his weakness will bring discredit upon the Lord’s name. Right or wrong, the preacher is the face of the Lord to the community. What did Paul tell Titus the Christians were to do in Crete, but adorn the doctrine of God (2:10).

    Perhaps there are many other reasons why a man should not preach, but these are just to identify a few reasons as to why a man should not be a preacher.

    On the other hand, why should a man preach?

    • A man should be a preacher because in his heart is a burning desire to share the Lord’s way with all who will listen to him.
    • A man should be a preacher because he understands 2 Corinthians 5:11
    • A man should be a preacher because he wants to serve God and help those who walk in this life as sheep without a shepherd.
    • A man should be a preacher the hope of this world is not the hope of God. The vast majority of people are confused about life, and what is important in life.
    • A man who proclaims God’s way can help (Acts 17:16-31).

     

     
  • Ron Thomas 8:00 am on November 26, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    The Work and Craft of Preaching 

    Essay 3

    In Paul’s second letter to Timothy he exhorted him to hold fast to the Lord’s pattern, a pattern of sound words. The word of God is our healthy medicine against spiritual sickness and spiritual death. Paul said to “hold fast” to that word; clearly, the idea is to anchor’s one soul or attach one’s soul to that which God spoke (cf. Hebrews 2:1-3). Paul also told Timothy to be strong in the Lord Jesus’ grace (2:1); an interesting concept to be sure. Perhaps it is associated with Titus 2:11-14. A.T. Robertson said it plainly that God’s grace is “where the power is located.” If the power is located in God’s grace, and the power of God is in the gospel (Romans 1:16), then it is easy to understand the importance of holding fast to the Lord’s pattern of sound words, isn’t it?

    In order to hold fast to the Lord’s word, the preacher, in this case Timothy, had to be sure he presented himself to the Lord for approval; presenting himself to man for approval was not what he was to do (cf. Galatians 1:10). He presented himself to the Lord favorably by handling the word of God correctly, accurately. This takes effort and time on the part of the preacher to do such things. He did this, however, not only for himself, but for the benefit of others (2:2). If a preacher loses sight of what is important (Galatians 6:14; 2 Timothy 2:20-26) his effectiveness in the Lord’s cause is minimized, if beneficial at all.

    A time is coming, Paul told Timothy, when men will not be interested in anything of the Lord, but will have a greater interest in themselves. Hasn’t this been the template of man since the days of Noah (Genesis 6:5)? Surely it has; does Paul have in view, then, some members of the church (cf. Acts 20:28-30)? Whether he does or not the point will be the same: be on guard. Though Timothy is to be on guard, the protective wall about him is not physical, but spiritual. Consequently, it may be the case that he will need to suffer physical persecution for his preaching. In fact, Paul said he and all others would (3:12).

    Timothy was to proclaim God’s news of the coming judgment and His good news of Jesus overcoming Satan’s hold on man (1:10). Paul told Timothy, in his first letter, that he must fight to good fight of faith. In this second letter, Paul was able to say that he did fight the good fight of faith (6:7); he was prepared now to meet his Lord. What a joyous occasion that must have been.

     

     
  • Ron Thomas 7:00 am on November 23, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    The Work and Craft of Preaching 

    Essay 2

    This is not an essay, I suppose. For sequential purposes, however, I will keep it as one though.

    Paul’s letter to Titus is short, but equally as instructive as his first letter to Timothy. To begin, God used preaching to get His word out to the community of man (1:3). Titus was a preacher that Paul, presumably, taught and trained; he was left on Crete in order “set things in order that are lacking.” This consisted of getting men in place to serve as elders. As a preacher Paul tasked Titus with the charge of rebuking talk and ideas that were contrary to godliness. It would be interesting if Paul had Titus do this with those not in the church, but this does not appear to be the case (1:10-16). Are not elders to do this? I think so, but until they are in place, the elders as a group can’t. Titus needed to do so. Paul gave Titus instructions concerning how to approach people, and what he as a preacher was to teach them to embrace. With regard to those desiring to walk faithfully before the Lord, Titus was to teach godliness and behavioral modification (2:1-10). In fact, as one adorned God’s doctrine (living godly), those same ones were looking for the Lord’s return.

    This is an important point to not overlook. We should be looking for the Lord’s return; this world is not our home, and to live as if we serve the “god of this world” is to bring disaster on ourselves.

     
  • Ron Thomas 7:00 am on November 22, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    The Work and Craft of Preaching 

    Essay 1

    The work of the preacher – some sundry thoughts

    The work of a preacher is developed by Paul’s letters to Timothy and Titus. Brief reflection on those words will be useful – and is very much necessary if one is to include the Lord’s standard to one’s personal teaching and preaching.

    It is interesting to me that in the early part of Paul’s letter to Timothy he gives a charge to Timothy to stand against error. Paul tasked Timothy to stay in Ephesus for the purpose of grounding the local church in the truth of God, opposing error as needed. Paul was fully aware of God’s mercy having been shown to him; because of God’s mercy he was motivated to proclaim the same mercy to others. In so doing, it was necessary to oppose error in what we commonly call doctrinal areas and oppose error in one’s behavior. Some failed to do this and because they did they wrecked their ship on the rocks they never saw.

    Paul did not leave Timothy in Ephesus just to combat error, however. Though opposing error is a necessary component of preaching the gospel, there is also edification and education that is to occur. Paul left Timothy in Ephesus to ground the church in the ways of God (1 Timothy 3:14-15). This consisted of having holy men lead in prayer, teaching godly women the propriety of modest behavior and apparel, and setting leadership and servants in place for the benefit of the saints and to the glory of God. The preacher is to be “nourished in the words of faith and of the good doctrine” (1 Timothy 4:6, NKJV) and, of course, he is to teach the brethren the same things. As Paul brings his first letter to Timothy to a close he speaks not only with regard to warnings, godly behavior for the preacher and non-preacher alike, but he says to Timothy that he is to “fight the good fight of faith” (6:12). Reading Paul’s letter to Timothy we learn of what this consists.

     

     
  • Ron Thomas 7:00 am on November 21, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    The Work and Craft of Preaching 

    ESSAYS

    Introduction

    I have been preaching for a while. My first sermon was when my family lived on Guam. I filled in on Sunday morning for the preacher; if I recall correctly, his wife was in the hospital. When we moved to Mountain Home, Idaho there were many occasions for me to preach; in effect, when our local preacher moved south I became the preacher. This lasted until one of the brothers picked up the mantle and did most of it from that particular point. Having returned from Saudi Arabia, I was discharged from the United States Air Force (honorably) and enrolled in the East Tennessee School of Preaching (Knoxville). Each weekend, while a student, I was preaching at one of the smaller congregations in the area (or region of NC, TN, KY, AL) that were in need of a preacher; some of the congregations in these areas just wanted to support the school’s effort by encouraging the preacher-students. After graduating from ETSOP my family moved to Jerome, Idaho, and lived there for just under three years. From there we moved to Sullivan, IL. We have lived here since June 1998.

    In brief, that is my background to the experience and length of time I have been preaching. I have been a student of God’s Word, however, since I was converted to Christ (1983); but it has been since 1993 that I have been a full-time student of the Lord’s Word serving as a preacher; I do not anticipate this changing until I take my last breath.

    Recently, I have had reason to reflect upon my preaching, the work of a preacher and the craft of preaching. I have a number of books in my library, but of late, I have been reading Tom Holland’s (TH) books on the topic. To me, TH is an exceptional preacher; one whose standard I have placed so high that at my best I will not meet his level. Since about 2003 or 2004 I have been going to Columbia TN for a preacher’s retreat; this retreat is now identified as the Columbia Bible Institute (CBI). It is the work of the Graymere church of Christ. The initial directors of the retreat/seminar were Tom Holland and William Woodson. With the passing of brother Woodson, the mantle fell on John Vaughan. CBI is focused on giving preachers encouragement in their work; it is a series of presentations by men who have preached for a length of time that are expository of biblical text, explications of biblical topics, and even some that are technical in nature; the all-around thrust is encouragement, however. It is a time for the men to gather together and share ideas, war-stories, laments, and even scouting.

    For the next six essays I would like to share some of my thoughts relative to the work of a preaching and preaching.

     
  • TFRStaff 7:17 pm on October 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , preaching   

    Did our gospel meeting do any good? (Charles Box) 

    By Charles Box— Our meeting with Eric Lyons has now come and gone. Attendance was good and we again commend all of you who faithfully attended the meeting. Eric did his part. He did what Paul encouraged Timothy to do. He preached the word of God faithfully. Paul charged Timothy, “Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.” (2 Timothy 4:2)

    Any time God’s word is preached good is done. “For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watered the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater: So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.” (Isaiah 55:10-11)

    The good that was done in this meeting will continue into eternity. Gospel meetings remind us of the great opportunities that surround us daily. Paul said, “For a great door and effectual is opened unto me, and there are many adversaries.” (1 Corinthians 16:9) Great doors are open for the Walnut Street Church of Christ. It is our responsibility to use these opportunities for God’s glory.

    The meeting did eternal good because we were involved in the meeting and now we should continue to be involved in the work of Christ.

    Think of the good that could be done if we would all be active in the work of the church and participate in the work that is to be done. I need to make every possible effort to attend every assembly of the church. I need to make the work of this church “My” work. I need to be faithful to participate in the worship of the church and active to involve myself in the work of the church. Let us be active for Christ now. Our time is limited to work in the kingdom. “I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.” (John 9:4) We were challenged in the meeting to give God proper place in our life. “But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.” (Matthew 6:33) Did the gospel meeting do any good? Yes, the meeting did eternal good because we were encouraged to be active participants in the work of our Lord’s one true church. “Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.” (Ephesians 3:21) (More …)

     
  • Ron Thomas 4:43 am on October 6, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , preaching   

    When Phil Sanders was here in Sullivan IL, there were many opportunities for us to have both small talk and discussions of substance. How valuable I thought those were! One of those points of discussion was on preaching; I can’t remember what prompted it, but what he said stayed with me, so now I am engaged in doing so.

    As a preacher for a number of years I have grown in the “craft” of preaching. That does not, necessarily, translate into me being a good preacher, but there is education taking place in my mind with regard to preaching. I have always regarded myself as but an average preacher, and I refuse to think of myself as anything more.

    Average preachers, no matter the years of experience, can learn much from others (regardless of age) and from reading books on preaching. These were the “talking points” between Phil and me. I have been fortunate to attend CBI (a preacher’s retreat in Columbia TN) for the last number of years. Two men who were continually before us were Tom Holland and William Woodson (brother Woodson recently passed away); as I looked upon the accumulated years of experience of the two men, took knowledge of their different styles of teaching (preaching), I grew to really like brother Woodson’s approach. Though I liked the style and substance of brother Woodson’s, it was brother Holland’s books I purchased. One such book is called “The Work of The Preacher Is Working.” I am currently reading this book, and I am better for it.

    Phil was sharing with me a challenge and exhortation he received a number of years ago from (I believe) Raymond Kelcy. Raymond told Phil to make it a habit to read a book on preaching continually. I have heard such advice before, but it was when Phil mentioned to me that it took hold.

    I think I will.

     
    • J. Randal Matheny 4:22 am on October 7, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Ah, so you were chatting with Phil instead of posting to TFR, eh? I’m glad you had that good opportunity to visit together. I pray much good was done in the gospel meeting. I used to read a good deal on missions and evangelism, but in recent years not so much. Your post reminded me it is important to keep one’s task fresh in mind and grow in service.

      • Ron Thomas 5:00 am on October 7, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Yes, I agree, Randal. I know I have not posted much, but hope to alter that a bit in the coming days.

        • J. Randal Matheny 6:33 am on October 7, 2012 Permalink

          I’ve missed your posts! Will be glad to see you contributing again. I know there are times when we need to take time away. I do myself, usually from the pressure of other tasks. Blessings today!

  • Richard Mansel 6:48 am on September 11, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , preaching   

    Great Quote on Prayer and Preaching 

    “Praying keeps my focus on God’s approval rather than the applause of people.”

    • Charles Swindoll, “Saying it Well” page 151.
     
  • J. Randal Matheny 7:53 am on August 30, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Portuguese language, preaching, , Zucchini   

    Thursday Thor 

    Soul bread

    A generic picture of bread like that The Missus makes

    Is it because Thursdays have been a day off of sorts that the mind today doesn’t want to get into gear for writing? After several attempts, I turned to other concerns, like eating some zucchini-nut bread and drinking some hot tea. No special concentration needed for those.

    • Our home Bible reading group was not large last night, but Titus 3 seemed to have good effect on us all. We five adults, three of whom are disciples, were impressed by the call to live, not as pagans, but as the people of God, thanks to his mercy. Amazing little letter, Titus.

    • Some Christian friends are coming either tomorrow or Saturday to spend a few days with us. This out-of-state couple are recent empty-nesters, like ourselves, and long-time friends. After so many years, it’s an easy friendship, no special effort needed to keep up conversation or to entertain. (I’ll not be online as much during their stay.)

    • For my birthday last week, a friend gave me a book on writing style in the Portuguese language. He knows how much I write, and how much I like writing. He made a big disclaimer that he was giving me the book, not because he thought I wrote badly, but because he knew I always wanted to improve and grow in the craft. But I confess that I picked up the Brad Thor thriller that his wife gave me before the writing book.

    • Speaking of writing, in an undiscovered corner of the Internet, I posted day before yesterday what I thought was one of my best pieces of poetry. Like sermons and Bible classes, it’s often the case that what the writer or speaker considers the best is not always the readers’ or listeners’ favorite. And, vice versa, the items one might wish to fall away into history forgotten can become among the most admired or preferred. Who’s to judge who’s right?

    Enhanced by Zemanta
     
  • TFRStaff 5:10 am on August 28, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching, proof-texting,   

    Book, chapter, and verse 

    by Hugh Fulford

    There was a time when all preachers in the church of Christ were known as “book, chapter and verse” preachers. By this it was meant that they endeavored to “speak as the oracles of God” (I Peter 4:11), and to prove every point they made by the Scriptures.They shunned the religious doctrines and commandments of men, they refused to preach their own opinions, and endeavored instead to set forth the will of God about any and every matter of which they spoke. I am thankful that we still have many such preachers, men who wish to be known simply as gospel preachers, men who can back up what they proclaim by a “thus saith the Lord.”

    Unfortunately, “book, chapter and verse” preaching has sometimes been wrongly characterized as “proof texting.”Proof texting is an abuse and misuse of scripture.It ignores the larger context of a verse and uses the verse to “prove” a preconceived notion or point of doctrine. As someone has observed, a text taken out of context is a pretext. Every passage of scripture must be understood in the light of its larger context, including the total teaching of the Scriptures on a particular subject. For example, all the verses ascribing salvation to faith in Christ must be understood in the light of all that the New Testament teaches with respect to what one does in response to the saving grace of God. (More …)

     
  • John Henson 3:26 pm on August 24, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , preaching   

    For the past couple of weeks, I have been reading, “The Witness of Preaching,” by Thomas Long for a homiletics class at Heritage Christian University. I’ve two questions that may interest the preachers on this blog. In Long’s book, he characterizes preachers in three ways: herald, pastor and storyteller/poet. Which kind of preacher are you? Do you believe a preacher could be all three in some way?

     
    • Eugene Adkins 5:55 pm on August 24, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Me = Herald. Often times I feel like I play the pastor role, but herald is the most comfortable for myself. I know some preachers (one specifically) who fits all three very well, but I think it’s rare across the board because of personality traits.

      Good questions, John.

    • J. Randal Matheny 8:18 am on August 25, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Maybe a mix of herald and storyteller/poet? I think there’s a place for all three types as a good mix: the herald, to announce the will of the Lord; the pastor, to show concern for God’s flock; the storyteller/poet, to match the telling with the wonder and the marvel of the story.

      • John Henson 10:33 am on August 25, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        I agree with you both. In my first homiletics classes, preaching was defined as heralding a message for the king.That’s what I learned to do, but as you both said, there are elements of all three that I’ve noticed in my preaching. Personally, speaking only for myself, I would not wish to be pigeon-holed into just one characteristic. When I first read this in Long’s book, I thought of Stafford North’s defined, exemplified, applied type of sermon and how all three fit into that kind of sermon. Things can be defined scripturally, exemplified by stories from the Bible and applied with personal knowledge of people in the congregation (a pastoral flavor, if you will). Thanks for your viewpoints. While it may be difficult for an old man like me to keep and open mind, I’m going to try to do just that.

        • J. Randal Matheny 3:57 am on August 27, 2012 Permalink

          I like what you said here and how you interfaced it with North’s types. Very nicely done.

    • John Henson 3:28 pm on August 27, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Thanks. I’ve had a real love-hate relationship with Long’s book, and I’m far from agreeing with him on much of what he says, but he makes some sense, too. It’s easy to throw the baby out with the bath water, but there is an opportunity to learn.

  • J. Randal Matheny 5:55 pm on July 22, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching,   

    Sermon after Aurora shooting 

    Neal Pollard mentioned on the Forthright Radio podcast yesterday, and posted on Facebook as well, his changed sermon for this morning, as he wrote, to “address a shaken Denver-area community:”

    “Getting From Dark Night To Bright Morning”

    Text: Heb. 6:11-19

    I. GOD’S HOPE WILL KEEP US DILIGENT (11)
    II. GOD’S HOPE WILL KEEP US FOCUSED (18)
    III. GOD’S HOPE WILL KEEP US GROUNDED (19)

     
    • Ron Thomas 5:19 am on July 23, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Mine was also changed. I preached on “WHY?” It was received well.

      • J. Randal Matheny 6:45 am on July 23, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Might want to share it here on TFR or elsewhere, Ron.

        • Ron Thomas 7:03 am on July 23, 2012 Permalink

          I haven’t given any thought to it actually. The audio will be online, I suspect, by Wednesday or Thursday (sent to Larry Miles who post for us). I will post a brief o/l like you did with Neal’s.

  • Richard Mansel 1:46 pm on June 4, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , preaching,   

    Organizing my Books 

    I sit in my office working and I realize I need a certain book from my shelves. However, I cannot find it.

    I mutter to myself, “I must get this office straightened up and organized!”

    I answer back. “Yes, absolutely.”

    Then I sigh and think,  ”Yeah, I’ll do that on a day when I have nothing else to do.”

    After a moment, I laughed uproariously and return to my work.

    Tomorrow isn’t the only thing that never comes. Preachers never get through with their work. They just stop at a certain point, leaving countless other things undone. It is the nature of the profession.

    When would that day come when we have nothing else to do? That would be the day we have forgotten what the ministry is all about.

     
  • Ed Boggess 8:23 am on June 4, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: dogmatic, , preaching   

    People say I’m dogmatic. The fact is I believe in being dogmatic. When I go to a pharmacist to have a prescription filled, I want him to be dogmatic about the proportions of ingredients. I do not want a doctor who says “Your ailment might be this or it could be that. We’ll try a few of these pills and if they don’t kill you, we’ll try something else.” When I fly an airplane, I want a dogmatic pilot; one who believes in landing with the wheels down. Likewise, I want to hear a dogmatic preacher who preaches a dogmatic message from a dogmatic Bible. The bugle message from most pulpits today is so uncertain that the Lord’s army doesn’t know whether to charge or retreat. We need certain preachers preaching a certain gospel from a certain Bible. Jesus said, “you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.” If it isn’t truth, then we don’t need it. This is Just-a-Minute with Ed Boggess

     
  • TFRStaff 7:54 am on April 25, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , preaching,   

    God’s simple wisdom 

    Brothers and sisters, wisdom is the principle thing. Let’s all be diligent to get wisdom. Our text today is 1 Corinthians 1:17-31. This particular passage is about two main concepts: the way man receives instruction about salvation and the nature of God’s wisdom in comparison to ours.

    We would generally consider foolishness to be the opposite of wisdom. But verse 25 of our text says that God’s foolishness is wiser than any wisdom which man might believe he had captured.

    Of course, God is never foolish. But that which God has done to provide our salvation, which seems foolish to man, is wiser than all the wisdom which the ages of man has been able to concoct.

    Consider that the “sages” like Aristotle, Socrates, Plato constantly tried to explain the meaning of man and were never able to even come to consensus, let alone correctness. The “great” religious leaders of centuries past have only confused mankind about the right way to heaven by the establishment of multiple religions. Believing that they were capable of helping God’s plan, multiple new creeds and commandments have been written causing many to turn away from religion altogether and millions others to assure themselves even though they are outside the salvation of God.

    God’s simple wisdom is: Salvation is through obedience to the Savior. The plan is disseminated to the world through preaching.

    Brothers and sisters, let’s preach (spread the gospel). But let’s preach the simple message. Let’s not believe that we must embellish it in order to make it palatable to man. An embellished gospel cannot save. Let’s not ignore parts of it. The violation of even one point constitutes breaking the law of God (James 2:10). And, let’s not fail to preach it. That is the wisdom of God.

    Mike Glenn

     
  • Ron Thomas 1:00 pm on April 23, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    The Lament of Many Preachers 

    “But as for you, son of man, your people (who are talking about you by the walls and at the doors of the houses) say to one another, ‘Come hear the word that comes from the LORD.’ They come to you in crowds, and they sit in front of you as my people. They hear your words, but do not obey them. For they talk lustfully, and their heart is set on their own advantage. Realize that to them you are like a sensual song, a beautiful voice and skilled musician. They hear your words, but they do not obey them. When all this comes true — and it certainly will — then they will know that a prophet was among them.” (Ezekiel 33:30-33, NET).

    Oh, that this wouldn’t be so – but it is!

     
  • Richard Mansel 10:34 am on April 4, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , preaching   

    Watching Young Preachers Grow 

    We have a young preacher, Rico Robinson, who is preaching our Gospel Meeting this week. He is 24 and beginning a new work. He has grown and matured the past few years and I am proud of him. We have had other young preachers that we support and they are special people.

    At our congregation, we train preachers, in a way. The last Sunday night of each month, one of our men preaches. On most Wednesday nights, one of our men does the invitation and on most fourth Sundays, they do the sermon at the Nursing Home. They teach an adult class at VBS and fill-in when the adult class teacher is gone.

    When I am out of town, we never have to go elsewhere looking for fill-in’s. We have several men who are perfectly capable of doing so. These men are really talented.

    Congregations need to be training men to preach and serve. Give them opportunities to grow. Preachers don’t need to be so insecure that we feel threatened by them. This is about the Lord’s church, not us.

    Talk to and support young preachers. Pass lessons along to them. Now that I have preached full-time for 17 years, I have wisdom that I can share with those who stand where I once stood.

    I’ve been fired and told to quit preaching. Yet, I persevered through these challenges and serious health problems. I can share that with young preachers and help them and their families.

    Will you do the same?

     
    • Jimsjn 12:07 pm on April 5, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Bro Richard

      Re: Wisdom

      Just wait until you have 35-40 years of preaching and see how much wisdom has increased. I am 66 and am amazed at the wisdom acquired from 55-65. I now pray for anotehr 15 years in the pulpit and teaching. Regarding wisdom and elders, I am of the firm conviction that no man should be appointed as an elder until he is 50. A friend of mine was just appointed as an elder. He is 72. Essentially the elders that are there were not!

      Keep the faith

      Jim

  • Richard Mansel 2:20 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching,   

    Sunday Night Sermons 

    A preacher will preach a sermon on a Sunday night and a member of the congregation will say, “That would have been a good Sunday morning sermon.” Meaning, that it would have been good if non-Christians could have heard the sermon and its points.

    We ask the question: What is the difference between a Sunday morning and a Sunday night sermon? In most cases, the weaker Christians and non-Christians will not be back on Sunday night. Therefore, we are speaking to more experienced Christians who need a different kind of teaching.

    Someone has wisely said that the perfect sermon is one that “makes the saved feel saved and the lost feel lost.” Through that lens there wouldn’t be any difference between the morning and evening lesson. Yet, the audience must still be considered.

    If a man is at a congregation for several years, he must cover new topics to keep the lessons fresh. There are many kinds of sermons and an endless variety of available topics. Is it even possible that they will ALL will fit neatly within the morning and night dichotomy? Obviously, not.

    The congregation has needs that must be addressed, as well as those that fit the times and culture. When we deliver a sermon, there are thousands of other topics that we needed to deliver at that hour. But we can only deliver one at a time.

    A preacher will cringe when someone prays that the sermon will be exactly what the congregation needs at this moment. The preacher knows that is impossible. Each person there has their own individual needs and he cannot possibly address all of them at once.

    With all of this in mind, how do we decide what to preach with all of these factors in mind?

    Accordingly, I ask you:

    How do you decide what to preach?

    What makes a Sunday night sermon?

    Are there sermons that fit both morning and night classifications? How do you handle those?

    I look forward to your input. Thanks!

     
    • J. Randal Matheny 2:23 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Most churches in Brazil, among them, the ones I work with, have only one meeting on Sundays. Sorry that this isn’t a question that I could really address.

    • Richard Mansel 2:25 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I knew that Randal. Thanks anyway. God Bless.

    • Chad Dollahite 2:31 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      This is always tough for me, Richard. I’m not sure how to answer it, either. I try not to think about it too much, but I do find myself sometimes thinking, “No, that’s more of a ‘Sunday night’ sermon.” Usually, that thought comes when I’m working on something a bit more in-depth or something that is more geared toward strong, faithful members. We have a small group here, but almost all of our folks who are able return for Sunday evening, so it has almost become a moot point for me. Either way, great thoughts here…thanks!

    • Brad 7:09 pm on March 13, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      My Sunday PM sermons are generally longer, more in-depth than the AM sermons. For example, twelve weeks covering the Minor Prophets, one PM for each book. In the AM, I am presently doing a series on prayer (based on questions that have been submitted by members). Some preachers I know of say “NT in the AM, OT in the PM.”

    • Chris Gallagher 8:45 am on March 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard,

      Great article. Regarding some of these matters, our congregation moved on Sunday night services to Sunday afternoon and changed the format to a Bible Study instead of a preaching service.

      Just some thoughts.

    • Weylan Deaver 3:06 pm on March 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      I’m probably guilty as the next fellow of thinking in terms of a Sunday morning sermon being applicable to non-Christians, because they’re more likely to be there Sunday morning than Sunday night. At the risk of putting me at odds with myself, I also believe our regular worship services should not be directed to non-Christians. Worship is for the saints, to God’s glory. Non-saints are welcome to sit in and listen, but they are unqualified to worship. Non-saints are outsiders. We ought to do what we can to make them insiders, but not at the expense of our worship services. What we end up doing sometimes, I think, is shortchanging Christians by making sinners the focus. I’ve got some related thoughts on every sermon having to end with an invitation, but will save those for now…

      • J. Randal Matheny 5:24 pm on March 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Don’t tell anybody, but many churches here, recognizing that worship is for Christians, and depending more on personal and small-group efforts for evangelism than the church meetings, don’t offer an invitation after the sermon.

  • J. Randal Matheny 7:01 pm on February 19, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , preaching   

    Sunday night depressurization 

    I pigged out on meat at lunch. I never do that. Why did I do that today? I’m a “flexitarian,” as House-to-House pub calls vegetarians who like their sausage now and again. (The spiritual point was negative.) Still lunch was unusual for me. Haven’t figured that out yet.

    • The Maiden has gone over the holidays with a group to a Christian retreat. We’re getting a feel for what it’s going to be like before long, when she leaves for work, school, life.

    • I love this passage, used it this morning for the communion meditation:

    18 “Forget the former things; do not dwell on the past. 19 See, I am doing a new thing! Now it springs up; do you not perceive it? I am making a way in the wilderness and streams in the wasteland. 20 The wild animals honor me, the jackals and the owls, because I provide water in the wilderness and streams in the wasteland, to give drink to my people, my chosen, 21 the people I formed for myself that they may proclaim my praise. Isaiah 43:18-21 NIV

    Want to take a shot at how I connected it to the Lord’s supper?

    • Don’t tell anybody, but I have on one of my Twitter accounts a Catholic who posted today’s liturgy (English version here). Out of curiosity, I clicked on it, saw this passage, and thought it a good one to use. So while I read this passage this morning in the church, it was also being read to thousands of the pope’s followers.

    • The speakers this morning and this evening were both good, as they usually are. We don’t have a single preacher in either congregation. The men rotate in the pulpit. What we may lack in continuity of thought (not a lack of continuity of doctrine; we speak the same thing), we gain in richness of each man’s perspective.

    • Some outside interference has been thwarted for now. Amazing how some authoritarians want to show up and run the show. Our people here have the spirit of cooperation. We pray it may always be so.

     
    • John Henson 7:35 pm on February 19, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Our spiritual drink is Christ, we honor and worship Christ, who is our spiritual drink. We are his chosen, his people who proclaim his praise. I LIKE IT!

      • J. Randal Matheny 3:55 am on February 21, 2012 Permalink | Reply

        Glad you liked it, John. I took the idea of living in the past, as not letting past sins weight one down, but rather, when we look back, seeing Christ rather than our sins.

  • Richard Mansel 10:22 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , preaching,   

    The Implanted Word 

    I am preaching through James and this Sunday morning, my text will be James 1:21, “Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness, and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.”

    What a great passage! What thoughts do you have on the implanted word and this passage in general? Thanks! I look forward to reading your great comments.

     
    • Patrick Medlock 11:24 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Richard, James’ words harmonize well with other areas of the NT regarding the word as seed analogy. The seed is living Heb 4:12-13, John 6:63; enduring I Pet 1:23 as well as soul-saving your text, Rom 10:13-15, & I Thessalonians 2:13. The successful engrafting of the word shows itself in exercise of our will to follow the spirit’s lead Gal 5:22-23, as opposed to allowing the flesh by default to quench the Spirit which permits an unsaved state of being to prevail Gal 5:19-21. Just a couple of third.

    • Eugene Adkins 7:58 pm on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Hello Richard,

      I always think of the parable of the sower in Luke 8. I also think of the emphasis that James placed in how we are to receive the word – with meekness. This is really powerful in light of the previous two verses that talks about our attiude toward the correction and admonition of God’s word. Most of the time we use the verses in relation to our relationship with others when the context is actually about our relationship with God’s word. The parable of the sower doesn’t say much about anger choking out the fruitfulness of God’s word but James sure does. Preach on!

  • Richard Mansel 10:14 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: preaching   

    Preachers are not weapons… 

    A woman calls me and basically says, “My husband is doing something I don’t like. Can you preach a sermon about it?” I’m thinking, “Um, no.” Have you ever had people try to get you to solve their issues with other people in the pulpit? It is disgusting, isn’t it?

     
    • Ron Thomas 10:21 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      No, I have not been so “fortunate.” I am glad.

    • Weylan Deaver 10:42 am on February 14, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      Several years ago, I did have a young wife request a sermon from 1 Peter 3:7 (her husband is also a Christian–both great people). I accommodated the request, but did not feel “used” as a weapon. I think she was sincerely trying, submissively, to help mold her husband’s character for the better. It sounds a little different than the case you mentioned.

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,083 other followers

%d bloggers like this: